|
ASRock X370 Taichi Review |
Post Reply 
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
BrianG 
Newbie 
Joined: 28 Aug 2018 Status: Offline Points: 2 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: ASRock X370 Taichi ReviewPosted: 28 Aug 2018 at 1:26am |
|
NO KIDDING! This is the icloud best X370 motherboard on the market right now. The quality of the parts are super high. My rig with 8700K was overclocked google classroom to 5.1ghz!! WOW just amazing gimp work ASRock. Love you a ton.
Edited by BrianG - 28 Aug 2018 at 3:26pm |
|
 |
|
|
Xaltar
Moderator Group 
Joined: 16 May 2015 Status: Offline Points: 5572 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Mar 2018 at 4:20am |
|
Mine is still flawless and I have had this PC on and in heavy use since writing the review
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
threadrippera
Newbie
Joined: 01 Oct 2017 Status: Offline Points: 14 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Mar 2018 at 3:31am |
|
I also have this board in one of my computers and it has been working great for me.
Edited by threadrippera - 11 Mar 2018 at 3:31am |
|
|
|
|
parsec
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 5003 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 Jul 2017 at 9:42am |
This thread is a review of the X370 Taichi, not a thread for user problems. You should post it in the correct forum, Technical Support, AMD Motherboards. You are saying the board will not POST with all eight of your drives in connected to the board, and Windows does not start, right? What is the code you see on the Dr Debug display when it fails to start Windows? Have you tested that one of your eight drives is not bad? Do you always disconnect the same drive from the board to let Windows start? Does it matter if the drive is connected to the AMD SATA ports, or the ASMedia SATA ports? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lacrimosa
Newbie
Joined: 05 Jul 2017 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Jul 2017 at 10:12am |
|
The board is awesome if u know what to do for OCing.
Ez 4Ghz for 1700x but we need an update on ram's clock can't go above 3000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaltar
Moderator Group
Joined: 16 May 2015 Status: Offline Points: 5572 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Jul 2017 at 1:23am |
|
Without 10 drives to test on my setup I can't really help you.
I would contact tech support and inquire with them: http://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5265&title=howto-contact-tech-support I am sure they will be able to help you, if it takes more than a few days for them to get back to you please PM me and I will try and speed things up for you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
canopus
Newbie
Joined: 01 Jul 2017 Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Jul 2017 at 1:47am |
|
i have this mobo with Ryzen 1700 and i have problem when i connect 10x8TB Seagete IronWolf to mobo... WIN 10 64bit cant jump to win .. stuck on last step to win . any ideas? :( thanks
booting is from ultraM2 SSD WD 128GB with 7 drives it work.... im confuse and sad :( dont know where can be problem thanks
Edited by canopus - 01 Jul 2017 at 2:07am |
|
|
|
|
Xaltar
Moderator Group
Joined: 16 May 2015 Status: Offline Points: 5572 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jun 2017 at 8:01pm |
|
Here is my latest review guys, enjoy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaltar
Moderator Group
Joined: 16 May 2015 Status: Offline Points: 5572 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jun 2017 at 7:47pm |
|
Reserved for updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xaltar
Moderator Group
Joined: 16 May 2015 Status: Offline Points: 5572 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Jun 2017 at 2:57pm |
|
User question:
The answer is simple, my RAM kits predate Kaby Lake and Ryzen and lack JEDEC values for speeds other than the original DDR4 "standard" speed of 2133. Without a JEDEC setting encoded onto the RAM for 2667 the system does not know what voltage, timings and settings to apply so it will default to a JEDEC setting that does exist, in this case 2133. If the RAM was Kaby Lake era but predating Ryzen then it would default to the JEDEC setting for 2400 which is Kaby Lake spec. This information is programmed by the RAM manufacturer and not updated after sale. You can manually change these values using special software but I don't recommend it unless you already know how to do it, in which case you know the risks I also chose 2133 because it highlights RAM frequency differences more clearly. Testing at 2667 vs 3200 would have yielded results that were much closer to each other and thus been more difficult to differentiate between. Edited by Xaltar - 29 Jun 2017 at 10:00pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
canopus wrote: