https://forum.asrock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:28:59 +0000 Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:48:11 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 https://forum.asrock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=13766 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_images/web_wiz_forums_black.png https://forum.asrock.com/ https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=13766&PID=73954&title=hyper-quad-m-2-card-performance#73954 Author: stonewater
Subject: 13766
Posted: 03 Apr 2020 at 12:48am

Of course I meant 'suspiciously like PCI3'.]]> Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:48:11 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=13766&PID=73954&title=hyper-quad-m-2-card-performance#73954 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=13766&PID=73953&title=hyper-quad-m-2-card-performance#73953 Author: stonewater
Subject: 13766
Posted: 03 Apr 2020 at 12:47am

So I just tried installing 4 x Seagate Firecuda 520's in RAID 0 on the Hyper Quad and I'm getting writes topping out at 3.89GBps and reads at 5.22GB/s which looks suspiciously to me like PCI4.

This is on a TRX40 Taichi which comes with the hyper quad - in the ASrock recommended PCIE4.

Did anyone else experience this / solve this?

Thanks

David
]]> Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:47:29 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=13766&PID=73953&title=hyper-quad-m-2-card-performance#73953 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=13766&PID=73272&title=hyper-quad-m-2-card-performance#73272 Author: bvalente
Subject: 13766
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 at 11:48pm

Thanks - is that 3x performance of?

Brian]]> Mon, 02 Mar 2020 23:48:57 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=13766&PID=73272&title=hyper-quad-m-2-card-performance#73272 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=13766&PID=73264&title=hyper-quad-m-2-card-performance#73264 Author: gizmic
Subject: 13766
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 at 6:21pm

actually quad raid 0 are closer to 3X performance
]]> Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:21:06 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=13766&PID=73264&title=hyper-quad-m-2-card-performance#73264 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=13766&PID=73262&title=hyper-quad-m-2-card-performance#73262 Author: cx5
Subject: 13766
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 at 3:06pm

Hello Brian,

seq read 4747ï¼?sounds too low, should be this link multiply 4 = 7000Mb/s
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zY4mMsbYdA4JUC3ayDKGUm-970-80.png


seq write 6115, sounds about right to me,

because 660p is slow, only around 1700mb/s,
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/FRZi4HbetMXCawprZFMsab-970-80.png
so 4 card is 7000.

If you get a HP EX950, write is 2900Mb/s then 4 card raid-0 is around 11000Mb/s

those guys with very high transfer are using very fast NVMe like HP EX950]]> Mon, 02 Mar 2020 15:06:38 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=13766&PID=73262&title=hyper-quad-m-2-card-performance#73262 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=13766&PID=73255&title=hyper-quad-m-2-card-performance#73255 Author: bvalente
Subject: 13766
Posted: 02 Mar 2020 at 11:03am

It seems my hyper quad m2 raid array is pretty slow?

seq read 4747 seq write 6115 (as measured by crystaldiskmark)

https://www.dropbox.com/s/sgqamkrc86zii97/crystaldisk.png?dl=0


this is 4x 1tb Intel 660p M2 cards in a raid 0 configuration


I have seen specs of similar setups that are 115304 seq read

doesn't have to match, but seems like it could be much faster?

I'm pretty sure I have the firmware configured correctly, the card is in slot 3.


the swap disks i have set up on the raid array are a constraint to performance on some of my most important apps

Any feedback, suggestions, questions would be great thank you!


Brian
]]> Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:03:16 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=13766&PID=73255&title=hyper-quad-m-2-card-performance#73255