<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>ASRock Forums : FM2A88X-ITX+ ROM are fatter than 8MiB whaaa</title>
  <link>https://forum.asrock.com/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; ASRock Forums : AMD Motherboards : FM2A88X-ITX+ ROM are fatter than 8MiB whaaa]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.04</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://forum.asrock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=14572</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[FM2A88X-ITX+ ROM are fatter than 8MiB whaaa : I looked at it and it seems maybe...]]></title>
   <link>https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=14572&amp;PID=76303&amp;title=fm2a88xitx-rom-are-fatter-than-8mib-whaaa#76303</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forum.asrock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=16296">AMD-fandom</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 14572<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 10 Jun 2020 at 5:22am<br /><br />I looked at it and it seems maybe the last 4k comprise checksums and perhaps signing by ASRock. Self-consistency (plus perhaps an unclonable physical factor, hooray!) Still...it hasn't worked? Anyone?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=14572&amp;PID=76303&amp;title=fm2a88xitx-rom-are-fatter-than-8mib-whaaa#76303</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[FM2A88X-ITX+ ROM are fatter than 8MiB whaaa : I managed to get a FM2A88X-ITX+...]]></title>
   <link>https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=14572&amp;PID=76110&amp;title=fm2a88xitx-rom-are-fatter-than-8mib-whaaa#76110</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forum.asrock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=16296">AMD-fandom</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 14572<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04 Jun 2020 at 3:49am<br /><br />I managed to get a FM2A88X-ITX+ to stop booting by presenting a 3.4 ROM on a flash drive. Attempts thereafter to burn the ROM have met similar fates in that the mobo will power up with no beeps and do nothing.<br /><br />I have a programmer (CH341 jumpered to 1.8V devices plus a utility) but I find that the binary image is 8,392,704 bytes rather than 8192ish, so it seems that it's not the binary or the first few kb are trash. What offset should I be starting flash with?  Is there a magic number at a certain location I can take as a cue? <br /><br />  For example the 3.4 ROM starts with ?¹Â?J#wÃ»H but at $0x00021000 there's another block of data, perhaps the load of UEFI image should be offset to that?<br /><br /><br />Maybe there's a binary viewer or ghidra environ I should load it into...<br /><br />]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 03:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=14572&amp;PID=76110&amp;title=fm2a88xitx-rom-are-fatter-than-8mib-whaaa#76110</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>