<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>ASRock Forums : x470 BIOS 8.01 [Beta]</title>
  <link>https://forum.asrock.com/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; ASRock Forums : AMD Motherboards : x470 BIOS 8.01 [Beta]]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 07:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 09:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.04</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://forum.asrock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=25863</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[x470 BIOS 8.01 [Beta] : @cx5Thanks for your info, and...]]></title>
   <link>https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104811&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104811</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forum.asrock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=10815">T1125P</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 25863<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12 May 2023 at 9:25am<br /><br />@cx5<br />Thanks for your info, and that screenshot. I see you went ahead and flashed the beta bios. So they ran out of space for the XMP profiles? LOL And you need to enter them yourself? Could be also the reason it's still in beta but, it works when you enter them manually which I see. That is good news then, being 1.2.0.8 is just for some security vulnerabilities that's probably not really needed for most home desktops I will hold off and wait until it leaves beta, if it does. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 09:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104811&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104811</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[x470 BIOS 8.01 [Beta] : http://www.my-acoustic.com/ima...]]></title>
   <link>https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104781&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104781</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forum.asrock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=6814">cx5</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 25863<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 09 May 2023 at 10:06am<br /><br /><a href="http://www.my-acoustic.com/images/3466%201.49v%2071ns%20135sec%20memtest%20ok%20games%20test%20OK%202023-05-08%20233141.png" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.my-acoustic.com/images/3466%201.49v%2071ns%20135sec%20memtest%20ok%20games%20test%20OK%202023-05-08%20233141.png</a><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by cx5 - 09 May 2023 at 10:09am</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 10:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104781&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104781</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[x470 BIOS 8.01 [Beta] : Hello @T1125PI&amp;#039;m using it...]]></title>
   <link>https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104772&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104772</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forum.asrock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=6814">cx5</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 25863<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 May 2023 at 11:38am<br /><br />Hello @T1125P<br /><br />I'm using it 1.2.0.8 hence share good news bad news.<br /><br />Bad news first, loading XMP from non QVL ram list will fail to POST, so we've got to key them in manually.<br />example cmk32gx4m2b3000c15=3000MT/s=1500Mhz, <br />the voltages does not load, does not update to required voltages,<br />i.e. <br />vddr_soc does not load to 1.1v, <br />cldo_vddp does not load to 1.0v, <br />VDDG_CCD & IOD does not load to 1.1v respective, <br />&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; they all just remains at AUTO, versus some older bioses will show actual voltages to be applied next, and true enough reboot failed to even POST, because all the voltages written above remains for clean bios boot 2133MT/s, which I recall is around<br />vddr_soc 0.9v<br />cldo_vddp 0.7v<br />vddg_CCD & IOD 0.9v<br />all not enough to run XMP.<br /><br />Then XMP's secondary timing was not loaded, i.e. tRAS, tRC, tRFC, tRFC2, tRFC4, tRRDS, tRRDL, tFAW, then POST also fails.....<br /><br />in ASRock's defence, they ran out of space for auto update voltages and timing ranges to fit in agesa 1.2.0.8 hahahahaaha<br /><br />bad news end.<br /><br /><br /><br />Good news start: -<br /><br />loadline Level 3 for CPU and SOC needed.<br /><br />successfuly POST and run windows for the FIRST time in 6 years the hynix AFR 25nm process cmk32gx4m2b3000c15 @ 3466MT/s = 1733Mhz in 3800x in taichi_x370 using agessa 1.2.0.8. Minimum POST voltage is 1.48v simple 1usmus EASY memtest 6000MB pass multiple rounds, but game crash after 10 minutes....... pretty good start..... so next test 1.5v (to be reported in future).<br /><br /><br />More good news, the cmk32gx4m2b3000c15 can even POST and run windows (light load = simple browsing, file browsing using windows explorer, screen capture, etc simple stuff) @ 3533MT/s = 1766Mhz HOORAY !!! minimum post voltage is 1.56v, will try 1.6v later (to be reported).<br /><br />timings started from a baseline copying Patriot's 32GB x 2 = 64GB, thanks to @POUL from overclock.net for sharing.<br />tCL 18<br />tRCD 22<br />tRP 22<br />tRAS 42<br />tRC 68<br />tRFC 991 (timing range not allowed, auto correct reduce to 990, I suspect whenever one of the timings cannot be read/fit will cause the entire secondaries timing not to load at all)<br />tRFC2 631<br />tRFC4 469<br />tRRDL 10<br />tRRDS 9<br />tFAW 40<br /><br />then TARGETing timings from 1usmus dram calculator SAFE with A0/B0 with dual rank with 2 sticks, then slowly reduce timings a little at a time and one by one.<br /><br />tomorrow will upload performance screen cap.<span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by cx5 - 08 May 2023 at 11:42am</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 11:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104772&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104772</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[x470 BIOS 8.01 [Beta] : Yeah, it&amp;#039;s one of the things...]]></title>
   <link>https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104759&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104759</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forum.asrock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=140">Xaltar</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 25863<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 May 2023 at 10:29pm<br /><br />Yeah, it's one of the things I have always liked about ASRock. I can't speak for<br />everyone but in my experience they have always tried hard to take care of their<br />customers. I don't care about review practices and marketing, let the youtubers<br />complain all they want, I care about quality of service and the attention paid to<br />me as a customer. Every manufacturer pushes for sales any way they can get away <br />with, that has nothing to do with quality or support. <br /><br />ASRock also consistently tries to cover the spectrum of users out there from the<br />ultra low budget to the bleeding edge early adopters. A lot of manufacturers are<br />afraid to cover the ultra budget section these days because of bad reviews and<br />such. A $80 motherboard is not going to be able to compete with even a $100 board.<br />After a certain point literally every cent makes a difference to features etc.<br />That $80 board is for someone who simply needs a board to get their system working.<br />It isn't a question of being good at anything. Anyone who has ever found themselves <br />searching by "price - lowest" because of budgetary constraints can appreciate<br />affordable products that allow them to put more money toward components that<br />have a larger impact on performance (within reason). ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2023 22:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104759&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104759</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[x470 BIOS 8.01 [Beta] : Hello, I also hope to leave Beta...]]></title>
   <link>https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104756&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104756</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forum.asrock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=26188">SerchTech</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 25863<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 May 2023 at 3:47pm<br /><br />Hello, I also hope to leave Beta but ...<br /><br /> <table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><img src="forum_images/quote_box.png" title="Originally posted by Xaltar" alt="Originally posted by Xaltar" style="vertical-align: text-bottom;" /> <strong>Xaltar wrote:</strong><br /><br />In other cases I have seen ASRock include "beta"<br />versions of BIOSes for boards that other manufacturers would no longer be supporting.</td></tr></table> <br /><br />This is true, ASRock just published BIOS (also Beta) with the latest AGESA version for all its X399 series (2017 release) downloadable from support websites for each model.<br /><br />Considering the frenetic market for CPUs/Motherboards IMO this translates into respect for the customer.<br /><br />Another issue is the policy of AMD or Intel stopping microcode improvements for their 2-year-old chips, really unsustainable and disrespectful. At least we get security mitigations, otherwise it would be a crime.<br /><br /><br /><br />Thanks T1125P for your OP and Xaltar answering here, an interesting topic to discuss in current times  <img src="https://forum.asrock.com/smileys/smiley20.gif" border="0" align="middle" /> ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2023 15:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104756&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104756</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[x470 BIOS 8.01 [Beta] : Thanks Xaltar, I guess I can wait...]]></title>
   <link>https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104754&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104754</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forum.asrock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=10815">T1125P</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 25863<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 May 2023 at 8:06am<br /><br />Thanks Xaltar, I guess I can wait a few months to see if it leaves beta, or as you said maybe there will be a newer one with the latest AGESA that's not beta. It's great they are still supporthing the x470 board, because the 5800X3D is one hell of a CPU and it will continue to be one for quite a while longer :D]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2023 08:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104754&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104754</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[x470 BIOS 8.01 [Beta] : It really depends. Some Beta versions...]]></title>
   <link>https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104750&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104750</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forum.asrock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=140">Xaltar</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 25863<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 May 2023 at 6:28am<br /><br />It really depends. Some Beta versions simply add a niche feature or fix and never<br />leave Beta as whatever they add is either very niche or is set to be included in <br />the next major release anyway. In other cases I have seen ASRock include "beta"<br />versions of BIOSes for boards that other manufacturers would no longer be supporting.<br />I suspect they are still fully supporting the x470 range though so in all likelihood<br />we should see a new BIOS version as soon as they have a more major version update.<br />I have no information on when that will be however.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2023 06:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104750&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104750</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[x470 BIOS 8.01 [Beta] : Hey all, I was just wondering...]]></title>
   <link>https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104745&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104745</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://forum.asrock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=10815">T1125P</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 25863<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 05 May 2023 at 6:14am<br /><br />Hey all, I was just wondering if anyone knows how long does it take for a BIOS to leave beta? A rough estimate :D I have 5.10 + 5800X3D and it's been awesome. I do want AGESA 1.2.0.8 but I don't feel comfortable with any beta BIOS. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 06:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=25863&amp;PID=104745&amp;title=x470-bios-8-01-beta#104745</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>