ASRock Forums : X370 F. Pro Gaming vs X399 FPG -- worse RAM compat https://forum.asrock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Sun, 08 Mar 2026 08:26:31 +0000 Sun, 24 Dec 2017 17:45:11 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 https://forum.asrock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=6050 <![CDATA[ASRock Forums]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_images/web_wiz_forums_black.png https://forum.asrock.com/ <![CDATA[X370 F. Pro Gaming vs X399 FPG -- worse RAM compat : New UEFI v2.0A out, changelog...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=41706&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#41706 Author: SoniC
Subject: 6050
Posted: 24 Dec 2017 at 5:45pm

New UEFI v2.0A out, changelog unknown (for now I only noticed bug-fixes no other major changes).
UPDATE: Doesn't contain the 6-beep XMP boot fix Wacko

Download (both Taichi & FPG):
https://gofile.io/?c=4ZkE45

Merry Xmas :)



Edited by SoniC - 26 Dec 2017 at 4:38am]]> Sun, 24 Dec 2017 17:45:11 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=41706&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#41706 <![CDATA[X370 F. Pro Gaming vs X399 FPG -- worse RAM compat : SoniC wrote: JUANNY wrote: ...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=41584&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#41584 Author: JUANNY
Subject: 6050
Posted: 22 Dec 2017 at 3:56am

Originally posted by SoniC SoniC wrote:

Originally posted by JUANNY JUANNY wrote:

Originally posted by SoniC SoniC wrote:

New beta UEFI 1.92 for X399 Taichi/FPG is out (stable probably will be 2.10). 
However when reading the changelog it doesn't look promising again...

Changelog 1.92>
-Fix 6 beeps if XMP 


where is the beta bios posted?

Here ya go -- contains both FPG and Taichi 1.92 beta (newer than 2.0)
https://gofile.io/?c=wSp43i


Thanks for the post - that 6 beeps on every reboot gets annoying after awhile
]]> Fri, 22 Dec 2017 03:56:00 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=41584&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#41584 <![CDATA[X370 F. Pro Gaming vs X399 FPG -- worse RAM compat : JUANNY wrote: SoniC wrote:New...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=41564&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#41564 Author: SoniC
Subject: 6050
Posted: 22 Dec 2017 at 12:06am

Originally posted by JUANNY JUANNY wrote:

Originally posted by SoniC SoniC wrote:

New beta UEFI 1.92 for X399 Taichi/FPG is out (stable probably will be 2.10). 
However when reading the changelog it doesn't look promising again...

Changelog 1.92>
-Fix 6 beeps if XMP 


where is the beta bios posted?

Here ya go -- contains both FPG and Taichi 1.92 beta (newer than 2.0)
https://gofile.io/?c=wSp43i

]]> Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:06:28 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=41564&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#41564 <![CDATA[X370 F. Pro Gaming vs X399 FPG -- worse RAM compat : SoniC wrote:New beta UEFI 1.92...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=41562&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#41562 Author: JUANNY
Subject: 6050
Posted: 21 Dec 2017 at 11:59pm

Originally posted by SoniC SoniC wrote:

New beta UEFI 1.92 for X399 Taichi/FPG is out (stable probably will be 2.10). 
However when reading the changelog it doesn't look promising again...

Changelog 1.92>
-Fix 6 beeps if XMP 


where is the beta bios posted?
]]> Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:59:38 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=41562&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#41562 <![CDATA[X370 F. Pro Gaming vs X399 FPG -- worse RAM compat : New beta UEFI 1.92 for X399 Taichi/FPG...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=41538&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#41538 Author: SoniC
Subject: 6050
Posted: 21 Dec 2017 at 2:50pm

New beta UEFI 1.92 for X399 Taichi/FPG is out (stable probably will be 2.10). 
However when reading the changelog it doesn't look promising again...

Changelog 1.92>
-Fix 6 beeps if XMP 
]]> Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:50:37 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=41538&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#41538 <![CDATA[X370 F. Pro Gaming vs X399 FPG -- worse RAM compat : Noup --- 2.00 brought nothing...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=40214&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#40214 Author: SoniC
Subject: 6050
Posted: 30 Nov 2017 at 11:45pm

Noup --- 2.00 brought nothing new to the table in regard of memory compatibility/stability/improvements.


]]> Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:45:45 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=40214&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#40214 <![CDATA[X370 F. Pro Gaming vs X399 FPG -- worse RAM compat : mayby next month (1.9) - optimist...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=39100&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#39100 Author: mixmasstrw
Subject: 6050
Posted: 09 Nov 2017 at 4:33pm

mayby next month (1.9) - optimist :)
]]> Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:33:34 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=39100&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#39100 <![CDATA[X370 F. Pro Gaming vs X399 FPG -- worse RAM compat : 1.80 BIOS :Same old, same old....Virtually...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=39009&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#39009 Author: SoniC
Subject: 6050
Posted: 08 Nov 2017 at 4:05am

1.80 BIOS : 
Same old, same old....
Virtually nothing changed for me... nothing... nada.

On my 64GB G.Skill Ripjaws V kit the 3200 speed is still unreachable. 4 sticks, Sammy B-die.
The only stable speed is 2933.



Edited by SoniC - 08 Nov 2017 at 4:08am]]> Wed, 08 Nov 2017 04:05:35 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=39009&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#39009 <![CDATA[X370 F. Pro Gaming vs X399 FPG -- worse RAM compat : Bios 1.80 (1.0.0.4) No progress...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=38997&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#38997 Author: mixmasstrw
Subject: 6050
Posted: 07 Nov 2017 at 10:30pm

Bios 1.80 (1.0.0.4) No progress in my case :(
I have F4-3200C16Q-32GTZB (Hynix not samsung - HWinfo) currently running on 2128 (not 3200).

This is a relatively new computer and I did not have enough time to tackle the subject, but until now, what I have tried does not allow me to speed up my memory.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1950X | Taichi | 32GB 3200MHz G.skil Trident Z
]]> Tue, 07 Nov 2017 22:30:07 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=38997&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#38997 <![CDATA[X370 F. Pro Gaming vs X399 FPG -- worse RAM compat : New BIOS out --- 1.80:Update AGESA...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=38984&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#38984 Author: SoniC
Subject: 6050
Posted: 07 Nov 2017 at 2:21pm

New BIOS out --- 1.80:
Update AGESA to 1.0.0.4

Testing will follow today in the evening.
]]> Tue, 07 Nov 2017 14:21:26 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6050&PID=38984&title=x370-f-pro-gaming-vs-x399-fpg-worse-ram-compat#38984