ASRock Forums : Fatality AB350 ITX/ac voltage monitoring . https://forum.asrock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Wed, 19 Aug 2026 23:27:25 +0000 Sat, 01 Dec 2018 01:43:02 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 https://forum.asrock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=8795 <![CDATA[ASRock Forums]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_images/web_wiz_forums_black.png https://forum.asrock.com/ <![CDATA[Fatality AB350 ITX/ac voltage monitoring . : You need to check the reviews...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8795&PID=58379&title=fatality-ab350-itx-ac-voltage-monitoring#58379 Author: mattyp78
Subject: 8795
Posted: 01 Dec 2018 at 1:43am

You need to check the reviews and customer experience of the users for a better idea and always buy genuine products]]> Sat, 01 Dec 2018 01:43:02 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8795&PID=58379&title=fatality-ab350-itx-ac-voltage-monitoring#58379 <![CDATA[Fatality AB350 ITX/ac voltage monitoring . : Thanks for using your time measuring...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8795&PID=56065&title=fatality-ab350-itx-ac-voltage-monitoring#56065 Author: WinWiz
Subject: 8795
Posted: 12 Sep 2018 at 4:20am

Thanks for using your time measuring and posting this information Smile

I believe real voltages would be higher than measurements done with a "bad" ground, so you shouldn't detract but add 20mV.
Or maybe my logic is somehow wrong?




Edited by WinWiz - 12 Sep 2018 at 4:23am]]> Wed, 12 Sep 2018 04:20:27 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8795&PID=56065&title=fatality-ab350-itx-ac-voltage-monitoring#56065 <![CDATA[Fatality AB350 ITX/ac voltage monitoring . : Hello guys , since there is no...]]> https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8795&PID=51974&title=fatality-ab350-itx-ac-voltage-monitoring#51974 Author: ALB92
Subject: 8795
Posted: 27 May 2018 at 9:27am

Hello guys , since there is no LLC options on this board i decided to do some direct voltage measuremens with a multimeter (from behind the CPU socket ) in order to identify if LLC is realy needed and if software monitoring tools ( HW info in my case ) are accurate or not.My results are the following :

Stressed the CPU with Prime95 small ffts . Since i used a random ground point on the board there could be as much as 20mV difference so you have to keep that in mind .

1) Stock voltage 1.237V ( R5 1600 )
-HWinfo SVI2 : 1,214V
-HWinfo VCore: 1, 232V
-Multimeter : 1, 255V ( -20mV ) = 1,235V

2) Manual voltage 1.35V
-HWinfo SVI2 : 1,287V
-HWinfo VCore: 1,312V
-Multimeter : 1,364V (-20mV ) = 1,344V

3) Stock Soc Voltage for RAM at 3000Mhz
HWinfo     : 1,087V
Multimeter : 1,094V (-20mV ) = 1,074V


So what we can learn from those numbers is that
there is about 10mV Vdroop for the core voltage at 1,35V although considering the difference compared to a proper ground point is in the 10-20mV range (i used worst case scenarion in my numbers ) this could be within the margin of error.So all considered i believe theres no real need for LLC options .

About the software monitoring as far as this model goes ( on other models it could be different ) i would trust more VCore rather than SVI2 although even VCore seems to be off by about 30mV to 40mV.

All this being said it would be nice if someone else could do some test and possibly confirm or contradict my observations.

Cheers.






Edited by ALB92 - 21 Aug 2018 at 9:31am]]> Sun, 27 May 2018 09:27:22 +0000 https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8795&PID=51974&title=fatality-ab350-itx-ac-voltage-monitoring#51974