5Ghz + submisions with Asrock motheboards
Printed From: ASRock.com
Category: OverClocking(OC) Zone
Forum Name: Achivement&Record
Forum Description: Share your HWBOT or Futuremark score here!
URL: https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=173
Printed Date: 04 Dec 2024 at 1:32am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: 5Ghz + submisions with Asrock motheboards
Posted By: bog_xdan
Subject: 5Ghz + submisions with Asrock motheboards
Date Posted: 24 May 2015 at 7:06am
|
I create this thread for everyone from this forum who had reached 5ghz frecuency with Asrock motheboards to post here. Air, Water, DICE, LN2 the cooling doesn't mather. So i start with: Socket 1156: i5 750@ 5023Mhz on air, motheboard P55 PRO. http://hwbot.org/submission/962464_bog_xdan_cpu_frequency_core_i5_750_5023.7_mhz" rel="nofollow - http://hwbot.org/submission/962464_bog_xdan_cpu_frequency_core_i5_750_5023.7_mhz Socket AM3+ FX 8300@ 5304Mhz, on AIO cooling, Raijintek Triton, motheboard 990FX Extreme9. http://hwbot.org/submission/2842408_bog_xdan_cpu_frequency_fx_8300_5303.96_mhz" rel="nofollow - http://hwbot.org/submission/2842408_bog_xdan_cpu_frequency_fx_8300_5303.96_mhz  ------------- Live free or die hard |
Replies:
Posted By: ncsipai
Date Posted: 24 May 2015 at 10:01am
good ideea.nice oc you have there.keep on going. |
Posted By: dani-zburatorul
Date Posted: 24 May 2015 at 11:11pm
|
Wow, nice ! ------------- FREE LIKE A BIRD |
Posted By: Illegalseagull
Date Posted: 25 May 2015 at 12:26pm
|
Here's my system! Intel i5-4690K ASRock OC Formula - Micro Atx mobo 8gb ram Corsair H100i GTX 120x2 AIO Water Cooling I love this computer. Runs at 4.5ghz all day/every day as my main household computer, using 1.23 vcore.  ------------- ASROCK Z97M OC Formula Intel i5 - 4690K @ 4.5ghz Stable Overclock |
Posted By: bog_xdan
Date Posted: 26 May 2015 at 4:14am
|
Nice. too bad Haswell it's not so good at frecuency like Sandy Bridge. There not so many Haswell cpu's to reach more than 5000Mhz on air/water. ------------- Live free or die hard |
Posted By: Jon
Date Posted: 26 May 2015 at 10:59am
|
Very nice -- I have struggled to take my 5820K beyond 4.5GHz but I have not given up the fight quite yet. ------------- ASRock X99E-ITX/ac | Intel i7-5820K | ASUS GTX 970 mini | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB | Crucial Ballistix (2x8GB) | Corsair CX600M | CoolerMaster Seidon 120V | CoolerMaster Elite 110 | Windows 10 64-bit |
Posted By: Illegalseagull
Date Posted: 27 May 2015 at 7:14pm
It's hard to beat an i5-750. Your 6+ghz is crazy. I wanted that cpu pretty bad, but it never happened, lol. Nice rigs ------------- ASROCK Z97M OC Formula Intel i5 - 4690K @ 4.5ghz Stable Overclock |
bog_xdan wrote:Posted By: Markk311
Date Posted: 24 Jun 2015 at 4:51am
|
ASRock Z97 Extreme4 I7 4790k @ 5Ghz Crucial Ballistix Sport 8GB (2x4GB) XSPC Raystorm waterblock with 3x120mm rad I might have the best overclocking devils canyon  . It ran 4.8 @ 1.95 volts on a CM212evo. Could probably push it a little further...
|
Posted By: Scripthen
Date Posted: 25 Jul 2015 at 6:40am
| FX4100, 990FXExtreme3 air cooled, 4.7 on Linux and 4.3-4ish on Windows before it black outs with BSoD. I could push it more for Linux but never tested it at 100%. 4.7 is confirmed, just no snapshots. |
Posted By: HeartOfDarkness
Date Posted: 08 Oct 2015 at 1:19pm
|
4790K/Z97 Extreme4 XTU 1266pts: http://hwbot.org/submission/2707043_heartofdarkness_xtu_core_i7_4790k_1266_marks Cinebench 11.5 5GHz 11.05pts: http://hwbot.org/submission/2672729_heartofdarkness_cinebench___r11.5_core_i7_4790k_11.05_points Cinebench 15 5GHz 1022pts: http://hwbot.org/submission/2707039_heartofdarkness_cinebench___r15_core_i7_4790k_1022_cb HWbot prime 5.1GHz 6407.26pts: http://hwbot.org/submission/2667839_heartofdarkness_hwbot_prime_core_i7_4790k_6407.26_pps |
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 08 Dec 2015 at 7:46am
Booted to 5.0 really easy, have to see where it can go from here... |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 08 Dec 2015 at 2:24pm
Congratulations  1.5v is very high for skylake. I hope you are using exceptional cooling and even then, I would not risk running at that Vcore for long. Booting at 5.0 is still a great achievement though.
|
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 08 Dec 2015 at 2:37pm
|
Nice one DooRules! Skylake processors are better than some people think. They run much cooler than Haswell processors, and seem to have crazy high VCore limits. OTOH, Haswell-E is a different creature. I can run stock clocks at under 1V. The Skylake stock VIDs I've seen posted would put me in shock. 1.4V for stock clocks? Seems that is more for the 6700K than my little (HA!) 6600K (could not wait for the 6700K in the USA). I did not see that with my 6600K. Not that 1.4V was needed at all for a 6700K, but why Intel did that apparently... Speaking of which, DooRules, does your 6700K have a high stock clock VID? Or is that the board influencing the VID? ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow"> 
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 08 Dec 2015 at 6:51pm
|
My stock clock is well under 1.0 as well parsec. When i tried the 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8 settings from bios I was expecting massive over volt from Asrock as to ensure boot to windows. But it was not nearly as high as I expected. At 4.8 setting from bios I am at 1.39 and 1.42 when I ran cinebench. Not too bad at all for a preset bios setting I thought. Temps never got over 67 on any core at 4.8. I have the chip under water Xaltar, nothing more exotic than that.  I am aware of the supposed limits of Vc for this chip but honestly I rarely pay much attention to that, as long as cooling is effective and I stay 10' from TJ Max i will try for higher. At higher clocks it will mostly be to see just what the chip can post at, not so much for running bench tests. I read all the reports about how only half of Skylake chips can reach 4.7 supposedly, I am now somewhat dubious about that... On another note parsec, installed irst driver 14.8 yesterday. Used the accelerate function to use 64 gbs of an ssd for cache for another drive. Still have to play around with that to see if i can get some concrete results. But it is fun to be playing around again, missed it.
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 7:28am
a little cold air and away we go   |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 7:39am
|
I had somewhat the same setup as you there in the lower pic when I had ten OC'd Opteron 165's running Folding. Two windows AC units stacked. One cooled the room, the other looked like we shared the ducting installer. I used dryer vent hose plumbed off a "manifold' that was directly somewhat attached to the one AC unit. Same vent hose at the rear of all machines, with a blower/manifold get up at the window pulling the exhaust out. Otherwise it was an outright sauna in here. |
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 7:36pm
-16" outside, good time to go cold again, lol 
had it that cold last night when I gave up and moved the pc back upstairs I waited about an hour for the pc to warm up naturally and slowly, take no chances with condensation
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 10:01pm
Awesome OC DooRules, I love winter too, every good bench run I have ever had has been with good ole "natural" cooling We are at -15c atm but sadly my G3258 gave me no more than my last major clocking attempts  Still 4.7 max validated and 4.6 bench stable isn't too bad for a cheapo Pentium Unfortunately no good for the 5ghz club. I could post at 5.0 but BSOD before windows fully loaded no matter the cooling or voltage.Wish I had a Z170 board for my 6600k so I could capitalize on the sub zero temps here right now
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 25 Jan 2016 at 5:38am
|
new http://valid.x86.fr/9eiy2k
 |
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 25 Jan 2016 at 5:40am
higher score  |
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2016 at 10:25pm
Short run on IBT, room temps, very close to Tjmax  |
Posted By: damric
Date Posted: 21 Feb 2016 at 2:24am
|
http://hwbot.org/submission/2467573_damric_cpu_frequency_athlon_x4_760k_5033.91_mhz" rel="nofollow - http://hwbot.org/submission/2467573_damric_cpu_frequency_athlon_x4_760k_5033.91_mhz http://valid.canardpc.com/tgtqir" rel="nofollow - http://valid.canardpc.com/tgtqir
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 21 Feb 2016 at 2:39am
|
Very nice Damric, 5ghz at 1.3v on an FM2+ system is fantastic I updated your post to make the links clickable ------------- 
|
Posted By: SurfaceUnits
Date Posted: 31 Oct 2016 at 10:56am
ASRock Fatal1ty 970 Performance, AMD FX-8310 @4.6GHz + 5GHz Boost  <Name>WinSAT</Name><Version>V10.0 Build-14393.0</Version> <Title>Windows System Assessment Tool</Title> <CmdLine>winsat formal -v -xml c:\winsat46005000.xml</CmdLine> <ExecDateTOD Friendly="Sunday October 30, 2016 7:09:45pm">736267:68985696</ExecDateTOD> <SystemScore>7.85</SystemScore> <MemoryScore>8.3</MemoryScore> <CpuScore>8.3</CpuScore> <CPUSubAggScore>8.4</CPUSubAggScore> <VideoEncodeScore>8.1</VideoEncodeScore> <GraphicsScore>8.4</GraphicsScore> <Dx9SubScore>9.9</Dx9SubScore> <Dx10SubScore>9.9</Dx10SubScore> <GamingScore>9.9</GamingScore> <DiskScore>7.85</DiskScore> ------------- ASRock Fatal1ty 970 Performance, AMD FX-8310 @4.6GHz + 5GHz Boost, 2x4GB G.Skill 2400 Sniper, 2X MSI Gaming R9 270 Twin Frozr, EVGA 600, Windows 10 64-bit |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 31 Oct 2016 at 12:14pm
|
Hmmm, guess I'll bump the multi up and enter my new just built 990FX Extreme9/FX-9590/H115i here. Can't be a Mod here and let you guys and gals have all the fun. |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 04 Nov 2016 at 3:55pm
|
Just a quick bump the Multi to 26 and a pinch of CPU Voltage. That CPU Voltage reading is reporting a smidge low. I had it set for 1.325. Now to start some serious tweaking. I only built this one last week. And please, keep in mind that's with 32GB(4x8GB) CL10 G.Skill Sniper. No easy feat OC'ing with 32GB!  |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 04 Nov 2016 at 4:13pm
|
I am starting to hate this thread I have had 3 CPUs all post at 5ghz + but not one of them was stable enough to boot and get authentication. Then again I guess it is much harder to do on air cooling. 5.2ghz  Is it stable enough to run Cinebench at those clocks? -------------
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 04 Nov 2016 at 4:42pm
I dunno. Windows was stable and I ripped a few newly discovered rare CDs at that. Down here with a much larger population the used CD market is just amazing. I see here it seems HWBOT is being used and I've downloaded it just now. Cinebench will be one run too. Still Firestrike? My Wife takes off Saturday for two weeks or so back to Michigan to visit. We'll find out after she leaves. You bring those hot Eastern European girls(and you know who I'm talking about) and parsec can bring the alcohol. Whatd'ya say? I'll wrangle up the remainder locally. Maybe get Admin here too seeings he doesn't have a life either |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 04 Nov 2016 at 4:46pm
" rel="nofollow -
And did you notice the 9590's temps under the H115i? Impressed the hell outta me ..... |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 04 Nov 2016 at 6:00pm
That I did! Great temps for a 9k series for sure  I have never use water in any of my systems, cost has always been an issue. -------------
|
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 04 Nov 2016 at 9:44pm
Gonna be a Grinch here, given the way AMD processors report temperatures. I'd like a second opinion, or at least with the CPU under a load. I assume those are idle temperatures? HWiNFO64, or it didn't happen. The ambiguous "Temp#" readings have quite a range, 40C down to 3.5C, must be chilly in Arizona now? Then a CPU Package temp of 27.6C at 2% load, but is that the H115's liquid temperature at 32.6C? Actually, quite a feat getting Corsair Link working, given what I've read about it in the past. Must have finally fixed it. Let's see an AIDA64 or Prime95 run with that H115! My CoolerMaster liquid cooler, 140mm rad with the insane 140mm JetFlo fans, had my FX-9590 on its knees temperature-wise, at stock clocks, running AIDA64. Xaltar, the Turbo speed of the FX-9590 is 5GHz, 4.7GHz base clock. So we have a modest OC, relative to that processor. You must know pushing 5GHz on a recent Intel processor is difficult. Recall DooRules 5.1GHz run at 1.52V VCore, which is the max VID for many Intel processors. Oh I'll bring alcohol if Xaltar shows up. Where were you guys when I was in Taipei? Yeah, I know... ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: J Z
Date Posted: 04 Nov 2016 at 10:49pm
Click and select "View Image" in your browser for full size 1920x1200 pics.  http://abload.de/image.php%3cimg=5.0-4.7-4000-6600k-ocshupc.png" rel="nofollow - ------------- Kind Regards, JZ https://shop.JZelectronic.de - Der Shop mit ausgesuchter ASRock Profi Hardware https://www.facebook.com/asrock.de |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 04 Nov 2016 at 11:14pm
|
Nice J Z! My 6600k tops out at about 4.7, I would need to push a lot more voltage to get it to boot at 5.0. I can post but as soon as windows loads I get a BSOD. I have boot mode set to 800mhz which naturally jumps straight to 5.0ghz once windows loads and crashes. I am not comfortable pushing more voltage on air though. -------------
|
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 05 Nov 2016 at 12:16pm
|
" rel="nofollow - J Z, you are running Prime95 at 5GHz, with a 58° C - 65° C maximum temperature? What are you using as a CPU Cooler? Xaltar, don't forget CPU-Z only shows VIDs, not the actual core voltage. I also see very different VIDs in Core Temp and in CPU-Z in the screen shots. Notice the memory speed of 4000? With 16GB. You don't see that without some special help. ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 05 Nov 2016 at 12:44pm
Aren't you just being a Debbie Downer over this. Bet you're a riot at parties  Why don't you light a fire(pun intended) to that 970/9590 combo and post up something here? As to ""My CoolerMaster liquid cooler, 140mm rad with the insane 140mm JetFlo fans, had my FX-9590 on its knees temperature-wise, at stock clocks, running AIDA64."" keep in mind, and I don't know if Intel behaves this way, but when you starve AMD silicon of voltage as was likely happening on that 970 when stressing they tend to run hotter. You and I have read it here and discussed it in PM's many many times. Why do you think in the time you've known me I frown upon users putting too much processor on a 4+1 board? Heat! Oh the secrets I still have from years and years with AMD. I'll get the proper OC set and then I'll post a screen grab or video for your doubts to subside She's decided she's leaving Sunday morning. Today I went and bought a desk proper that can accommodate whatever I wish on it. So till then pull those silk panties outta your crack, and relax a spell. |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 17 Nov 2016 at 3:08pm
This work for ya? EDIT. Sheet! I forgot the temps. I'll re-run this tomorrow. It's late and she'll be home in the am. Work to do here before she arrives. CPU/NB I have set full time @ 1.2625v All 8 purring at 5.1 running 4x8GB Kit of G.Skill 2133 Rt click and View Image for full size  |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 17 Nov 2016 at 10:58pm
|
Sadly even with water cooling my system just won't cooperate 4.6ghz max and that is unstable under any decent load. It looks like either my Z170 Pro4s isn't up to the task, despite adding bulkier VRM cooling and having a 140mm fan blowing directly on them, or my ES CPU just doesn't have it in it to go higher. One day, one day I will have a post in here of my own  -------------
|
Posted By: kleshas-priest
Date Posted: 29 Nov 2016 at 5:44pm
|
Nice to meet you, everybody I do over clock in the country of Japan I do not understand English I write it by machine translation I used MB of ASRock for the first time Stable Over Clock is made of excellences and is very glad Online Games are usually idle from an errand by this setting If it is funny English, I'm sorry CPU i7-6700k @5.0GHz Cooler Cooler Master/MasterAir Maker 8 RAM Corsair/CMU32GX4M4C3466C16 M/B ASRock/Fatal1ty Z170 Professional Gaming i7 VGA Manli/M-NGTX1060/5REHDP DRIVE SAMSUNG/NVMe 950 Pro M.2 SAMSUNG/NVMe SM961 PSU CoolerMaster/V1200 OS Windows10 Pro 64bit Air-cooling 5Ghz OC 4C8T Intel Burn Test 10Laps Clear  |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 29 Nov 2016 at 6:36pm
|
" rel="nofollow - Awesome stuff kleshas-priest! Those temps are a little on the high side, I would imagine that is running something like Prime 95 or Intel Burn in Test? Ideally you will want to try and lower those temps especially if you were not 100% stressing the CPU to get them. -------------
|
Posted By: kleshas-priest
Date Posted: 29 Nov 2016 at 8:41pm
|
Thank you for comment. I have finished running in intel burn test.(4C8T Load100% 10Laps.) Because it is an air-cooling, temperature is not usually high to here though it is high. And...it is machine translation... For example... A machine translates temps(Temperature) into a temporary worker,japane I sometimes write something in blog and twitter, upload an image, please read it from there. |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 29 Nov 2016 at 8:44pm
" rel="nofollow -
Dang. Cooler Master says that cooler is rated to 250w but it isn't getting the job done there very good. What fans do you have pushing and pulling air in and out of your case? That's getting a tad bit hot. |
Posted By: kleshas_priest
Date Posted: 30 Nov 2016 at 4:30pm
|
Nice to meet you,wardog ah.... I may not explain it well Well...At first from a CPU : Heat spreader which was made with press machine : see it horizontally : But In fact, a rim swells  : center of heat spreader of the CPU becomes dented. : Therefore I sharpen it evenly in oil Stone. (It took approximately 24 hours until it became level.) : Please image it so that it is parallel to silicone die then. : I exclude heat spreader.
: I Application a silicon die with LIQUID PRO of Cool Laboratory company. It is cooler next : A contact surface of MasterAir Maker 8.
: But it is a curved surface plenty.Therefore I sharpen it in an oil stone. : The vapor chamber part which was welded to the backside the surface swell into a punctiform. : I confirm it using red lead(or minium)  : Only the point touch a CPU. : Therefore...not surface contact with a CPU. : In an Oil Stone,I revise it.  : Apply LIQUID PRO and make modifications : Then attached to a CPU  When I say Why you do it When I use the CPU grease of the liquid metal and.... : fan is a double side in cooler. COSAIR SP120 High Performance Edition High Static Pressure : case is Thermaltake Core X9  The image that is in the middle of still building it One to write English is difficult than I sharpen a CPU (lol
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 30 Nov 2016 at 4:50pm
|
In English we call sanding/smoothing the CPU heat spreader and CPU cooler contact surface Lapping You also delidded the CPU and replaced the thermal compound with higher grade material, great stuff! Thanks for sharing the pics A lot of people seem to think you need a mirror finish on a Lap job but the truth is, all you need is an even surface with maximum contact between the CPU and cooler. In some cases, given high quality thermal compound a rougher finish actually provides better thermal contact as the paste gets into the fine grooves. In all my testing with lapping I found it made very little difference, rough finish or mirror when it comes to cooling performance. The only thing I found interesting was when I mirror finished both my CPU and cooler (an old P4 B 2.4ghz) I was able to use them with no thermal compound with no ill effect. The 2 would actually stick together if you removed all the air from between them. It takes a lot of patience to do so anyone reading this take note, you can't rush this kind of thing or you will end up ruining it. -------------
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 30 Nov 2016 at 8:37pm
|
I absolutely love my Core X9 Not since my old Packard Bell 486DX25 have I had the pleasure of working on a horizontal motherboard. And what with the X9's side and top panels being removable I now have room for both elbows in there. And unfortunately both thumbs too |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 30 Nov 2016 at 9:02pm
Xaltar, the way read his post there just now he has mistakenly re-applied the factory heat spreader back over his die. If so, that is most likely causing his temps to reflect what they are. Simply lapping the heat spreader and be dome with it. Yet he also shows removing it and applying Coollaboratory to the top of the die also. Stp at one or the other. But not both. That's a recipe for diasas........... Heat! |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 30 Nov 2016 at 9:06pm
" rel="nofollow -
Xaltar, I'm thinking move these non-Benchmark posts to elsewhere for just that reason you touch upon there. Whatd'ya say? |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 11 Dec 2016 at 12:22pm
|
This is with all 8 cores of the FX-9590 running, as set in the BIOS, at 200x25 Motherboard: ASRock 990FX Extreme9, BIOS P1.80 Processor: AMD FX-9590 Processor Multi set to 25 LLC set at 75% Memory: 16Gb(2x8) of 32GB(4x8) G.Skill F3-2133C10Q-32GSR Kit Memory set to XMP Profile 2, Extreme Profile, 2133 Mhz 10-12-12-31 1T Memory residing in slots A2 and B2 Corsair H115i set at Balanced Windows Power set to Performance C States disabled in BIOS CPU/NB +.05v, from +1.25v to +1.30v Remaining parts are: Fractal Design Define S w/H115i rad on top exhausting PNY XLR8 1050Ti Seasonic SS-850KM3 Samsung 850 EVO 500Gb and 1TB These were the only changes in the BIOS and Windows. All else in BIOS set to Auto, except where needed to make Multi and Voltage changes. Next up is 5.1Ghz  Edited to get pic proper |
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 11 Dec 2016 at 10:44pm
I'm supposed to comment on the temperatures, since I'm a naysayer about AMD processor temperatures of some sort, according to wardog.  So I'll remain in Naysayer mode, with a capital N. I am good at that, learned it from my father. As he would say, "I'm not prejudiced, I hate everyone". A more accurate term would be cynic. So full cynic mode it is! So we have a full 5GHz submission here... hmm, isn't 5GHz the stock Turbo speed of the FX-9590? Yes it is. Oh wait, I see you hit 5,053.5MHz when the Buss Clock hit 202.1MHz, as it wandered around a bit. The thread title is 5GHz + submissions, so that has been achieved. Now temperature time. But the question is, what to comment on? AMD processor temperature readings are done differently than Intel. Intel has no concept of the "socket temperature", and which temperature readings HWiNFO64 assigns to its various labels for AMD processors is not obvious, IMO. For example, the CPU Package temperature is normally the highest temperature reading for an Intel processor. That can be the highest single core temperature of an Intel processor, but is higher than that temperature for the HEDT processors, up to ~10C, although that levels out as the core temperatures approach their maximum, 100C for most Intel processors, 105C for HEDT processors. The maximum specified temperature of an FX-9590 is... not easy to find. The CPU Package temperature, as I saw with my FX-9590, are impossibly low. Mine at idle would show single digit values, sub-ambient. That must really be a delta above some base value, which might be the ambient or possibly socket temperature. The maximum value there of 46C would seem to be very close to a delta above the socket ambient temperature, of ~20C. The other CPU temperature shows a maximum of 59.5C, which is mighty fine for a VCore of 1.552V. We don't see CPU core usage quite at 100%, but very close. Time for an OC, I look forward to seeing that! ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 12 Dec 2016 at 6:51am
Careful there. You're showing your AMD Noobness. AOD > CPU Status - Thermal Margin To the rest of that you posted above, running all 8 cores at 5.0 and above is a feat. A feat of the motherboard as well seeing I far exceeded the 220W TDP by doing 5.0 on 8. Stock 4.7 to 4.75 its running 8 cores but above 4.75 it begins dropping the least productive cores to focus on 4 then 2(?) cores. I'm coming to the conclusion you hold something against AMD ....... |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 27 Dec 2016 at 9:59pm
|
http://hexus.net/tech/news/cpu/100726-intel-core-i7-7700k-overclocked-beyond-7ghz/
2.0v core voltage Even on LN2 that makes me cringe  -------------
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 27 Dec 2016 at 11:09pm
Yea but Splave of Team Kingston gets his hardware for free by now I'd guess. http://www.asrock.com/news/index.asp?id=2914 He's been at it for awhile: https://www.google.com/search?num=40&q=splave+-sprave+site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fvalid.canardpc.com |
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 27 Dec 2016 at 11:54pm
No, I just don't like the ambiguity of AMD's CPU temperature reporting. Since I'm an AMD noob, explain this: AOD > CPU Status - Thermal Margin. Plus, I still don't see a value for the FX-9590's maximum temperature. What is it? This is a serious, honest question. Nothing sarcastic or implied about it. I'll let the rest go... for now. ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 27 Dec 2016 at 11:55pm
The other noteworthy part is it was done on an ASRock Z170 OC Formula board. ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 28 Dec 2016 at 12:19am
-------------
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 28 Dec 2016 at 7:48am
AOD = AMD OverDrive program Thermal Margin shows the differential from current to Max temp |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 28 Dec 2016 at 7:58am
Yea yea you two. I'm working on it.  It sure isn't as simple as OC'ing an AMD system.cough...Intel..cough  |
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 28 Dec 2016 at 12:40pm
" rel="nofollow -
In no way does this answer the question. I will try again... What is the maximum temperature, in degrees Centigrade, of the FX-9590 CPU, before thermal throttling begins? Is that what you are calling "Max temp"? That spec is readily available for any Intel processor. I know the answer (there isn't one), but I hoped you would just admit it. Oddly, you can find that spec for other FX series processors, although it is not as clearly defined as Intel does it. This is not a matter of superiority, or fan boy BS (how I HATE that), but really a question. Why does AMD not provide that information to the public? ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 28 Dec 2016 at 1:06pm
" rel="nofollow -
This is my last opportunity at pleasing you. This spec was just updated. http://products.amd.com/en-us/search/CPU/AMD-FX-Series/AMD-FX-8-Core-Black-Edition/FX-9590/98 It is at 57c on the FX-9000's to keep TDP at +/- 220W that the collaboration between AMD and the MB manuf's officially compatible boards keep within the MB design limits. FX-8000's are 61c. Like it or leave it. |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 04 Jan 2017 at 10:23pm
|
BOOM http://valid.x86.fr/ractqu" rel="nofollow - http://valid.x86.fr/ractqu -------------
|
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 21 Jan 2017 at 2:02pm
Finally saw this, excellence!!  Given all the contempt for Kaby Lake by CPU enthusiasts about IPC improvement over Skylake (none), at least (!!) they OC to 5GHz+ with stability. Managing the temperatures at that speed is another story. Personally, I think an OC should be compared to the base frequency of the processor. The i5-7600K's is 3.8GHz, so that is a 1.3GHz OC for 5.1GHz, which is 34% of the base frequency. I have my i7-7700K at 5.0GHz now, from a base frequency of 4.2GHz, an 800MHz OC, 19% of the base frequency. A much more impressive result for the i5-7600K, unless Intel is being conservative with the i5 K processors? ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 21 Jan 2017 at 2:31pm
|
I have noticed that the average OC delta over stock appears to be almost the same between Skylake and Kaby Lake. So as you said, 800 mhz on your 7700k = 5ghz where most 6700k CPUs topped out around 4.7/4.8, same OC, higher base clock. IMO that is a significant improvement. If we look at the history of CPUs, there are many instances where new generations were simply higher clocked variants on previous generations. Pentium II - Pentium III (slot A) for example, AMD's entire Bulldozer and derivative lineup etc. Faster is faster and with Kaby Lake you have the bragging rights of hitting 5ghz +. I have reverted my system to stock because, well, lets face it, 4.2ghz is plenty fast enough I was able to boot at 5.2ghz but as soon as I tried to actually open CPUz I got a BSOD. No amount of added voltage, LLC settings or other tweaks would get it stable enough for a validation. Interestingly @5.1ghz I achieved a 10k+ score in CPUz's internal benchmark. That beats out most 6c/12t i7s in the comparison list. -------------
|
Posted By: CPL0
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2017 at 1:20am
|
Have some old ones... i7-4700MQ mobile quad CPU with Asrock IMB-180. Base 2.4GHz, OC 5GHz http://valid.x86.fr/xq8v44" rel="nofollow - http://valid.x86.fr/xq8v44 i7-4600M mobile dual CPU with Asrock IMB-180. Base 2.9GHz, OC 5GHz http://valid.x86.fr/q5cazf" rel="nofollow - http://valid.x86.fr/q5cazf Also ran some DDR3 SO-DIMM at 1400MHz with that board (2800MT/s) which broke the DDR3 SO-DIMM world record at the time AFAIK but nobody seemed interested. :( Nice clock but a shame they were single rank modules.  |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 13 Feb 2017 at 1:33am
|
Damn that is one hell of an overclock on both those CPUs, mostly the 2.4ghz model 100+% overclock -------------
|
Posted By: mgrandy@hotmail.co.u
Date Posted: 11 Mar 2017 at 12:10pm
|
i had 6.3 stable on my last amd a10 6800k get this fm2a55-dgs lol mb kinda y i stuck asrock really hate this thred !   sorry but i dont have any temp picks at the time i no it was 76 deg wiped hdd many times since. to lessen the load and keep the clock stable i had to reduce everything visual. blue is easy for the computer to produce so i used that as a solid back ground. i tried on windows 10 could only get 5.3 ghz window xp 64 bit i could not get a decent copy of that worked so couldnt test ------------- fx 9370 asrock, fatal1ty 970 performance 3.1, NZXT phantom f-atx, AeroCool Integrator 850W, Corsair Hydro Series H100 |
Posted By: SerpentXSF
Date Posted: 28 Jun 2017 at 3:30am
|
I hit 5.2 Ghz on Intel 7700k and Z270 Taichi AIO Corsair H100i V2 http://valid.x86.fr/3g0kin  ------------- SerpentX Z270 Taich, Intel 7700k G.Skill TridentZ 3200 960 Evo and 850 Evo Aorus 1080 Ti 
|