Printed From: ASRock.com
Category: Technical Support
Forum Name: AMD Motherboards
Forum Description: Question about ASRock AMD motherboards
URL: https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5989 Printed Date: 25 Dec 2024 at 11:48pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: IBT AVX - requestPosted By: Asingo
Subject: IBT AVX - request
Date Posted: 04 Sep 2017 at 2:57pm
I need help from Ryzen users. Can you do IBT AVX test? Download it from here so that we all have same
version.
LINK:
https://files.fm/u/pcaf7hat
Here is http://imgur.com/a/ifieO" rel="nofollow - my results on Standard test. On some forum users told me that I have low memory score (Gflops). On AMD FX these score is around 130 and I have around 110. Can someone test this please?
Replies: Posted By: datonyb
Date Posted: 04 Sep 2017 at 3:45pm
your link directs me to a page saying i dont have permissions
Ok, I can do the test from that. I was thinking to put that link but zip file is called differently. I will retest that I will post here. Standard test.
Posted By: datonyb
Date Posted: 04 Sep 2017 at 4:40pm
well i dont know whats up here but i get 80 gflops and test took 160 seconds
i do have a load of stuff running and a game open though
On that picture geardown mode is set to disabled but in BIOS is set to AUTO
are settings ok for 2400mhz?
I've been up all night building and configuring a NAS box for a client. To run XPEnology no less. Finally finished. Sorry for the delays in responding. He now has a box running the latest Synology DSM and is configured exactly as a 12-bay DS3615xs. Replete with three 4-port Intel Server NIC's to run Synology's Surveillance Station in viewing and alerting him of intrusions.
Asingo, list out your hardware if you'd be so kind.
When I wake, I'll read your reply.
Night all.
Posted By: Asingo
Date Posted: 05 Sep 2017 at 12:29am
wardog wrote:
Asingo wrote:
wardog wrote:
" rel="nofollow -
Asingo wrote:
I don`t get it, you get 88 and I get 51 on that test form majorgeeks. Why is that a big difference. IBT AVX test nor reliable?
Yea. Test to test there you have ~1gb of mem diff. Background processes there must be running.
I close all backgrund programs and in test I got 53
On that picture geardown mode is set to disabled but in BIOS is set to AUTO
are settings ok for 2400mhz?
I've been up all night building and configuring a NAS box for a client. To run XPEnology no less. Finally finished. Sorry for the delays in responding. He now has a box running the latest Synology DSM and is configured exactly as a 12-bay DS3615xs. Replete with three 4-port Intel Server NIC's to run Synology's Surveillance Station in viewing and alerting him of intrusions.
Asingo, list out your hardware if you'd be so kind.
When I wake, I'll read your reply.
Night all.
No problem, it is not urgent. Sweet dreams
My spec are:
x370 k4 - bios 3.1
r5 1600 stock (3.4ghz - sometimes 1-2 cores jump to 3.7ghz)
2x8gb CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 - running at 2400mhz - xmp profile
very great tutorial for my board and my memory. I will follow that than I will report here
Posted By: Asingo
Date Posted: 09 Sep 2017 at 1:01am
" rel="nofollow - Wardog, I follow this tutorial for my mbo and ram and I got 2933. Seems stable for now.
Here are the pictures:
https://imgur.com/a/8XaJF
IBT AVX test stays the same (Gflops), why is that? I am worried that you got the much better high score with slower memory? Is that normal? AIDA64 score (MB/s) normal for this frequency?
Opinions?
Posted By: nangu
Date Posted: 09 Sep 2017 at 2:37am
Asingo wrote:
" rel="nofollow - Wardog, I follow this tutorial for my mbo and ram and I got 2933. Seems stable for now.
Here are the pictures:
https://imgur.com/a/8XaJF
IBT AVX test stays the same (Gflops), why is that? I am worried that you got the much better high score with slower memory? Is that normal? AIDA64 score (MB/s) normal for this frequency?
Opinions?
Your AIDA64 memory benchmark seems to be inline with my own results @2933.
I get a bit better latency, but it's because my 14-16-16-16 timings and 1T Geardown enabled.
I'll try to run IBT this weekend and post my results.
EDIT: Try fFAW = 24 (4 times tRRDS). It worked on my end and lowered latency from 82 to 79ns.
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 09 Sep 2017 at 2:37am
As I said previously, gflops are more affected by the amount of RAM, than speed.
A FLOPS is actually a measure of "Floating Point operations per Second"
It, gflops, is not a measure of anything more.
Nicely, I think you're spending too much time worrying over very little. There are far more benchmarks that you should be focusing your attention to.
That said, give me those screenies of AIDA if now at 2933 it will let you change CAS/CL to 14. It should maybe at 15 but 14 will change things up big time.
Posted By: Asingo
Date Posted: 09 Sep 2017 at 6:22pm
" rel="nofollow -
wardog wrote:
As I said previously, gflops are more affected by the amount of RAM, than speed.
A FLOPS is actually a measure of "Floating Point operations per Second"
It, gflops, is not a measure of anything more.
Nicely, I think you're spending too much time worrying over very little. There are far more benchmarks that you should be focusing your attention to.
That said, give me those screenies of AIDA if now at 2933 it will let you change CAS/CL to 14. It should maybe at 15 but 14 will change things up big time.
I don`t understand what are you trying to say?? To give you screenshoot of AIDA64? I put these in my yesterday post...
To change tcl to 14-15?
Also should I change what user nangu tolde me, try tfaw 24?
In that tutorial which I used for this memory tweaking there is a this line:
As for the tRFC, tRFC2 & tRFC4 you may try yo go higher if the current options don't work tRFC1: 525 tRFC2: 389 tRFC4: 239
or maybe even 607-451-278 just for the heck of it and see if that improves stability for this RAM chip.
I used first numbers, would it be faster to used the numbers in second row (607-451-278)?
Posted By: nangu
Date Posted: 10 Sep 2017 at 3:17am
tRFC values are dependant on memory speed. Each memory chip has a manufacturer recomended value.
On the AMD comunity post, that one which talk about DRAM, they said tFAW can be calculated as 4 times tRRDS. As your tRRDS is 6, I suggested to try tFAW=24, which worked straight for me and delivered lower latency values and a bit higher bandwith.
Cheers.
Posted By: nangu
Date Posted: 10 Sep 2017 at 4:05am
Just tried IBT for you. I got 77 Gflops @2933 14-16-16-30 geardown enabled.
Posted By: Asingo
Date Posted: 10 Sep 2017 at 5:03am
" rel="nofollow -
nangu wrote:
Just tried IBT for you. I got 77 Gflops @2933 14-16-16-30 geardown enabled.
Thanks
Ok, I will try tommorow maybe.
You used IBT form majorgeeks site? Can you post aida64 memory benchmark score here?
Posted By: nangu
Date Posted: 10 Sep 2017 at 8:09am
Asingo wrote:
" rel="nofollow -
nangu wrote:
Just tried IBT for you. I got 77 Gflops @2933 14-16-16-30 geardown enabled.
Thanks
Ok, I will try tommorow maybe.
You used IBT form majorgeeks site? Can you post aida64 memory benchmark score here?
Stay with one tack or another. Keep on with following the other thread you're on now.
Mixing the two, what I ask and what you're already following, won't prove beneficial and instead only complicate what you see and experience there.
I have average knowledge of english but I still don`t understand what are you trying to say....
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 10 Sep 2017 at 5:01pm
Asingo wrote:
I have average knowledge of english but I still don`t understand what are you trying to say....
Work this with one person/Thread.
Do not try this while listening to or following multiple people talking in your ear.
It will only confuse you and cause you to pull your hair out.
Posted By: Asingo
Date Posted: 10 Sep 2017 at 7:06pm
wardog wrote:
Asingo wrote:
I have average knowledge of english but I still don`t understand what are you trying to say....
Work this with one person/Thread.
Do not try this while listening to or following multiple people talking in your ear.
It will only confuse you and cause you to pull your hair out.
Ok, you mean about what user nangu advises (tFAW) and before that my thread on Overclock forum (first I asked there something about OCCT and than discussion turned on memory questions).
I didn`t made any of those changes yet.
What do you advise me, some more memory tweak on my 2933mhz settings? You still haven`t told me is my score alright for Aida64?
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 10 Sep 2017 at 9:55pm
Asingo wrote:
wardog wrote:
Asingo wrote:
I have average knowledge of english but I still don`t understand what are you trying to say....
Work this with one person/Thread.
Do not try this while listening to or following multiple people talking in your ear.
It will only confuse you and cause you to pull your hair out.
Ok, you mean about what user nangu advises (tFAW) and before that my thread on Overclock forum (first I asked there something about OCCT and than discussion turned on memory questions).
I didn`t made any of those changes yet.
What do you advise me, some more memory tweak on my 2933mhz settings? You still haven`t told me is my score alright for Aida64?
Yea. That's what I was trying to get across
IMO, I like the 14-16-16-30 CAS1. Your latencies are lower and your Mem scores went up. But IMO the Tras is way to low which may be the low cache scores.
Set them using XMP then make the changes.
Care to show me an AIDA of 14-18-18-34 CL/CR1 ? That should be a better improvement.
Posted By: Asingo
Date Posted: 10 Sep 2017 at 11:02pm
wardog wrote:
Asingo wrote:
wardog wrote:
Asingo wrote:
I have average knowledge of english but I still don`t understand what are you trying to say....
Work this with one person/Thread.
Do not try this while listening to or following multiple people talking in your ear.
It will only confuse you and cause you to pull your hair out.
Ok, you mean about what user nangu advises (tFAW) and before that my thread on Overclock forum (first I asked there something about OCCT and than discussion turned on memory questions).
I didn`t made any of those changes yet.
What do you advise me, some more memory tweak on my 2933mhz settings? You still haven`t told me is my score alright for Aida64?
Yea. That's what I was trying to get across
IMO, I like the 14-16-16-30 CAS1. Your latencies are lower and your Mem scores went up. But IMO the Tras is way to low which may be the low cache scores.
Set them using XMP then make the changes.
Care to show me an AIDA of 14-18-18-34 CL/CR1 ? That should be a better improvement.
So you want me to enter this manully timmings:
14-18-18-34
Tras change, nothing for now?
Sorry for lot of questions, not my territory :(
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 11 Sep 2017 at 8:47am
Yea. Set them up using XMP Profile, and then make the change(s).
Posted By: Asingo
Date Posted: 11 Sep 2017 at 4:27pm
wardog wrote:
Yea. Set them up using XMP Profile, and then make the change(s).
I used current 2933mhz xmp profile which was already active during my first memory tweaking.
Here it is: 14-18-18-34
https://imgur.com/a/vr8TA
Didn`t test stabillity. Small increase in Aida64.
Did I enter those CL1?
What next if this is stable?
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 11 Sep 2017 at 11:39pm
You're changing the Multiplier between tests doesn't help.
Posted By: Asingo
Date Posted: 12 Sep 2017 at 12:17am
wardog wrote:
You're changing the Multiplier between tests doesn't help.
I didn`t change multiplier. That is the boost to 3.7 (one or two core). My cpu is on stock settings. 3.4 and in stress test it jump to 3.7ghz. From the beginning I didn`t touch anything in bios except memory settings and fan temperature.
Posted By: Asingo
Date Posted: 12 Sep 2017 at 2:37pm
bump
Posted By: Asingo
Date Posted: 13 Sep 2017 at 2:11pm
" rel="nofollow - Wardog?
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 13 Sep 2017 at 2:18pm
Asingo wrote:
" rel="nofollow - Wardog?
Sorry man. I hosed my system building a How-To RAID Tutorial.
Posted By: Asingo
Date Posted: 13 Sep 2017 at 2:48pm
wardog wrote:
Asingo wrote:
" rel="nofollow - Wardog?
Sorry man. I hosed my system building a How-To RAID Tutorial.
OK, no problem, I thought you forgot
Seems like 14-18-18-34 is not stable. Last night when I turned on PC it started to shutdown and restarting and it reversed to 2133mhz. Than I loaded my settings before 14-18-18-34 so I am still on 2933mhz. What now? Not urgent, when you have time
Posted By: Asingo
Date Posted: 19 Sep 2017 at 3:23am
My memory that was at 2933mhz was stable for 1-2 weeks
(didn`t test stabillty in memtest, just played some games). Before 2 days when
I turned on PC it entered restart loop mode and it reverted settings to
2133mhz.
I am slowly starting to give up on this board
Posted By: nangu
Date Posted: 19 Sep 2017 at 4:40am