Low core speed
Printed From: ASRock.com
Category: Technical Support
Forum Name: AMD Motherboards
Forum Description: Question about ASRock AMD motherboards
URL: https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6292
Printed Date: 22 May 2024 at 12:49pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Low core speed
Posted By: Chinodus
Subject: Low core speed
Date Posted: 09 Oct 2017 at 12:13pm
|
" rel="nofollow - Hello. a few days ago I bought the ASRock AB350M Pro4 motherboard and the Ryzen 1600 processor. Immediately updated the BIOS to the latest version (3.10). But when I ran the computer, I ran into a problem. The processor frequency does not rise above 1546 MHz. The multiplier is 15.5, respectively. I tried reset BIOS settings, tried to roll back to an earlier BIOS version, turned on / off CPU and RAM overclocking. None of this helped. I tried to use the advice from the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIPIbl81x-Q Tried some other options, which right now I do not remember. What else can I do? I already despaired and I sit on the problem for two days. Or, perhaps, ASRock knows about such a problem and in the near future there will be an update? P.S. sorry for the mistakes, English is not my native language
|
Replies:
Posted By: datonyb
Date Posted: 10 Oct 2017 at 12:39am
|
" rel="nofollow - it seems to be a bug in newer ryzen cpus asrock apperently now have a buggy cpu to run testing with but it should run stock bios at proper stock cpu speeds do you mean 'when' you try to overclock it sticks at 1550 mhz ? ------------- [url=https://valid.x86.fr/jpg250]  [/url]3800X, powercolor reddevil vega64, gskill tridentz3866, taichix370, evga750watt gold |
Posted By: Chinodus
Date Posted: 10 Oct 2017 at 2:45am
" rel="nofollow -
in BIOS the processor frequency is displayed correctly, for example, 3200. But when the computer is already on, the frequency is unchanged - 1546 MHz. This frequency is in both idle time and when I do stress tests. Regardless of whether I am overclocking the processor. This is very bad. As a result even the processor on my old laptop is ultimately more powerful...
|
datonyb wrote: