Print Page | Close Window

How to mount the AB350 Pro4 board

Printed From: ASRock.com
Category: Technical Support
Forum Name: AMD Motherboards
Forum Description: Question about ASRock AMD motherboards
URL: https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=7083
Printed Date: 07 May 2024 at 10:21am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: How to mount the AB350 Pro4 board
Posted By: trobins
Subject: How to mount the AB350 Pro4 board
Date Posted: 28 Dec 2017 at 2:45am
" rel="nofollow - The AB350 Pro4 MB does not have the usual 9 screw holes as all other ATX boards I've installed. I only see 7 possible locations to place the screws. I'm afraid I'm going to make a mistake mounting it to my case and shorting it out. Does somebody have a diagram of the proper mount points for this board? The manual didn't help, and ASRock support was unwas unwilling to clue me in.



Replies:
Posted By: zlobster
Date Posted: 28 Dec 2017 at 3:09am
Check this: http://www.formfactors.org/developer/specs/atx/atx2_1.pdf and http://www.formfactors.org/developer%5Cspecs%5Catx2_2.PDF

It seems this board doesn't comply with the ATX standards. Smile Go tell on ASRock to the ATX guys. Big smile

Anyway, you should use only the available mounting holes. At least they appear to be 'standard'.

Just make sure there are no stand-offs pre-installed on your chassis, as they may do some damage if ASRock didn't drill a hole for some of them.

P.S. the Taichi has all 10 holes, as required by spec.


-------------
1700X ZP-B1 (stock); X370 Taichi (UEFI 3.10); 16GB F4-3200C14-8GFX XMP; 256GB 960 EVO; RX 580 NITRO+ 8GB


Posted By: trobins
Date Posted: 28 Dec 2017 at 8:52am
Thanks for the reply. The board also doesn't meet the size standard. Anyway, referring to Figure 2 of the ATX 2.1 standard, the ASRock B350 comes with screw holes for A, B, C, F, G, H, and J. No K, L, or M (it's only 9" wide, so it wouldn't reach those). 

I'm sure the board works without those. The one thing I'm worried about, however, is that the case (Riotor CR1080) has a non-conductive peg at position H. 



Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 28 Dec 2017 at 10:47am
" rel="nofollow -
Originally posted by trobins trobins wrote:

The AB350 Pro4 MB does not have the usual 9 screw holes as all other ATX boards I've installed. I only see 7 possible locations to place the screws. I'm afraid I'm going to make a mistake mounting it to my case and shorting it out. Does somebody have a diagram of the proper mount points for this board? The manual didn't help, and ASRock support was unwas unwilling to clue me in.


Your board has the standard ATX standoff mounting points, but is not a wide in the horizontal direction, and does not use the two standoffs on the far right side at the top and bottom, as you know. The hole at the very bottom, right corner is not for a standoff, but can be used with a plastic support peg that are available.

This style of board has been used for years, I have had several like that myself, so nothing new or unique. As long as your PC case only has standoffs in the standard ATX locations, you will not be shorting out the board.

The peg in the H position should be a common peg for any commonly sized mother board, including yours. It should match the ATX standard, but should be removable if not. If it is not removable, and does not match your board's standoff layout, that is a mistake by the case manufacture.


-------------
http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: zlobster
Date Posted: 28 Dec 2017 at 7:46pm
Originally posted by trobins trobins wrote:

Thanks for the reply. The board also doesn't meet the size standard. Anyway, referring to Figure 2 of the ATX 2.1 standard, the ASRock B350 comes with screw holes for A, B, C, F, G, H, and J. No K, L, or M (it's only 9" wide, so it wouldn't reach those). 

I'm sure the board works without those. The one thing I'm worried about, however, is that the case (Riotor CR1080) has a non-conductive peg at position H. 



ATX 2.1 and above mandates all 10 holes for full ATX boards. If it's not as per specs it's NOT an ATX. End of story.

As for the H-stand-off, if you can cut it down low, do it. I wouldn't like it pressing against the mobo, if I was you.


-------------
1700X ZP-B1 (stock); X370 Taichi (UEFI 3.10); 16GB F4-3200C14-8GFX XMP; 256GB 960 EVO; RX 580 NITRO+ 8GB


Posted By: trobins
Date Posted: 29 Dec 2017 at 12:08am
" rel="nofollow - Thanks for the thorough answer. One misunderstanding that I've had up until now is that all conducting stand-off had to be used (grounded to the chassis). But that's wrong...right? Anyway, I be using all of them, including B (why not?).


Posted By: trobins
Date Posted: 29 Dec 2017 at 12:10am
" rel="nofollow - That's what I was thinking. What could possibly be the benefit of deviating from the standard? Anyway, as long as the board does what it's supposed to, I'm fine. 


Posted By: zlobster
Date Posted: 29 Dec 2017 at 5:12am
Contrary to what you may believe it's better to use the conductive stand-offs. Note that the mobo holes have these tiny blobs of solder around them. Electronics LOVE good grounding! In fact, many issues arise from BAD grounding. Just make sure your H peg is removed.

On the why's - it couldn't be any simpler - money! They are cheaping out on PCB, copper and other stuff that inflates the BoM. It may seem marginal but imagine a $2 save times 100 000 mobos. That's $200 000 pure cash in the worst case scenario!

I think what I wrote in the previous paragraph is what's fundamentally wrong with most of today's fat tech corps - they are ran by accountants and MBAs, not by engineers. Kudos to AMD in this regards. Most of AMD top brass are engineers through-and-through.


-------------
1700X ZP-B1 (stock); X370 Taichi (UEFI 3.10); 16GB F4-3200C14-8GFX XMP; 256GB 960 EVO; RX 580 NITRO+ 8GB



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net