Firestrike scores
Printed From: ASRock.com
Category: OverClocking(OC) Zone
Forum Name: Achivement&Record
Forum Description: Share your HWBOT or Futuremark score here!
URL: https://forum.asrock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=811
Printed Date: 03 Feb 2025 at 6:52pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Firestrike scores
Posted By: Xaltar
Subject: Firestrike scores
Date Posted: 11 Sep 2015 at 1:50pm
|
I figured I would make a thread here for 3d mark Firestrike scores seeing as it is a popular benchmark and will give forum goers something to stack up against. Please formulate as follows: System Specs: CPU: Pentium G3258 @ 4.6ghz Motherboard: ASRock Z97 Extreme3 RAM: ADATA XPG 1600, 4gb x2 GPU: Gigabyte GTX 960 G1 Gaming 2gb (optional) HDD: PNY optima 256gb PSU: OCZ Camp1on Series 1000w Cooling: Thermaltake Frio OCK Case: Deepcool Tesseract Firestrike score: 6803 Validation: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5403158" rel="nofollow - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5403158 This is mine, currently number 1 for a GTX 960 and G3258 combo on futuremark  Post up yours and see how you stand among your ASRock peers
 |
Replies:
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 09 Dec 2015 at 4:25am
|
Little play time with gpu this afternoon... http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6746058
 |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 09 Dec 2015 at 5:39am
|
Damn that is a nice score! My poor GTX 960 and G3258 combo can't even break 7k. Gotta love Maxwell
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 11 Dec 2015 at 6:24pm
|
A little better. Got the core up +100 and the memory up +425, just had to up the voltage on memory and it scales very nicely to V increases... http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6766242  |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 11 Dec 2015 at 6:56pm
| Very nice, it's good to see you get what you pay for. My 960 performs almost exactly half as well as a 980 and your 980 Ti cranks out an additional 4000 points or so over the 980 which is well ahead of what I have seen overclocked 980s score. The Maxwell 2 line is about the most impressive step forward in GPUs I have seen since the Radeon HD 5000 series came out. I can't wait to see what comes next with Pascal and what it will bring to the table on the 16nm process with HBM. |
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 12 Dec 2015 at 8:07pm
|
Moved chip from 4.8 to 4.9, all else same, fraction slower on gpu mem... http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6783199  |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 12 Dec 2015 at 9:55pm
|
What kind of voltage are you running to get 4.9 benchable on your 6700k? By the looks of it you have a good chip on your hands
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 12 Dec 2015 at 10:00pm
|
I can run pretty much anything at 4.9 with Vc of 1.465, fixed, llc 2. Temps during runs never hit above 71 on any core, actually two cores hit 70 and 71, with the other two topping out at 68. For short periods of time, I don't see too much of a chance of this presenting any problems. Short time being about an hour at a time.  Will try seeing if there is a difference using bclk to achieve higher clocks as opposed to just upping the multi. Never know till ya try, right.
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 12 Dec 2015 at 10:18pm
|
Haha, I was planning on trying the same as soon as I get my hands on a 6600k, BCLK vs multi and see what benches best Looking forward to seeing your results.
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 20 Dec 2015 at 9:25pm
|
New high... http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6868072
 |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 20 Dec 2015 at 10:05pm
|
Number 3 with your CPU/GPU combo, nice going
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 20 Dec 2015 at 10:57pm
| Yup, saw that. He has his chip at 5.3 so most likely using LN2, no catching him, lol. Most pleased with the chip, gpu and Asrock mobo though. |
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 7:34am
new high with the cold air...  http://www.3dmark.com/fs/7316203
 |
Posted By: PetrolHead
Date Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 8:31am
|
How much does the CPU OC affect your scores with that GPU? I've noticed that my own GPU is so much of a bottleneck, than even a ~20% OC will only result in an increase in the physics benchmark, which seems to be pretty irrelevant in the calculation of the total score. For the other parts of the benchmark - yes, even the combined test - my CPU OCs have had no effect. Only OC'ing the GPU helps. I would expect your CPU to be able to keep up with a single 980 Ti with ease, but since they're probably more balanced than my CPU/GPU combo, I'm curious. ------------- Ryzen 5 1500X, ASRock AB350M Pro4, 2x8 GB G.Skill Trident Z 3466CL16, Sapphire Pulse RX Vega56 8G HBM2, Corsair RM550x, Samsung 960 EVO SSD (NVMe) 250GB, Samsung 850 EVO SSD 500 GB, Windows 10 64-bit |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 8:32am
|
Number 2 with that CPU/GPU combo now congrats Only a few points separating you from #1 now and the top guy is at 5.3ghz. You top all his scores save physics.
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 9:59am
|
Thanks Xaltar. I find CPU OC to be very important in getting a good score. I could tell during the run when I got the cpu at 5.04 that is was going to be my best run to date. It especially important when i have only the 4 core chip, the 6 core chips just walk all over me in physics and combined score. No worries there though, I knew that going in. Still need to tweak the gpu bios some, some throttling still going on.
 |
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 1:50pm
So we already have the number two Firestike score in the world in the Xaltar/ASRock Firestrike thread, and on page two of the thread!     On an ASRock board too, take that naysayers!     Nice work DooRules! Don't fret over the six core processor scores, that's an unequal comparison. BTW people, DooRules has experience with all kinds of PC hardware and mother boards. If he says he likes his Z170 Extreme7+ board, that means something. I really like this board too. I recently read a thread in another forum where the author said Skylake was the worst platform ever, that was the thread title. That of course is nonsense, as well as bringing new interfaces and capabilities (NVMe PCIe SSD support via the chipset, and also in RAID with the IRST driver), it remains as stable as earlier Intel generations. C'mon Xaltar, a G3258? When I saw my GFLOP results with my good G3258 OC'd to 4.5GHz, compared to my Haswell Xeon (Xeon GFLOPs are ~5x the G3258), reality set in real quick.  Skylake runs cool baby, cool.  Plus they laugh at voltages Haswell users cringe over.  IF these Skylake processors had solder under the IHS, it would be the reincarnation of Sandy Bridge, but even better.  My Haswell-E chip OCs easily, and the upcoming Broadwell-E 10 Core processor might be amazing. But Skylake-E will be famous, mark my words!  ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow"> 
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 9:19pm
|
Thanks for the kind words parsec. Much appreciated bud. The Skylake chip on this Asrock board is truly an awesome combo. It is capable of hanging with the six core chip systems which speaks volumes to its efficiency. Most pleased with the performance. Took me a little time to figure out how Asrock has implemented their LLC settings in bios but now it is relatively easy to get the chip over 5.0 at required Vc to be stable. Last night at 5.1 on the chip I had idle temps down to 4',4',4' and 2' C. Cinebench topped out at 65' on one core, that is amazing. For a 4 core chip the 6700k is most capable chip. Love it.
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 9:48pm
|
My scores on my 6600k are nothing to write home about atm. I don't have a Z170 board atm so no overclocking yet. I will get there eventually then I'll have a crack at the number 1 spot for a GTX 960 + 6600k. I suspect it will be no mean feat given the popularity of this particular combo with more budget oriented gamers. On the up side my GPU is a brilliant clocker so all I need is a solid OC on my i5 and I am in with a shot Sadly my #1 G3258 score has been knocked off it's perch but someone managed a better OC and got a good run so congratz to them. My G3258 was tripping the limits on that run so I won't be beating it this time out. Still holding on at #2 though I love my Z97 Extreme3, before that my scores were abysmal. Not only did my G3258 refuse to go over 4.2 on my last board but my GPU would cause TDRs and not even OC half as well as it does on the Extreme3. My best run on the Extreme3 was @4.6ghz which means my G3258 wasn't as much of a dud as I had first thought. To be fair to the original board I had it in, it was only a B85 chipset so not the best for OCing.
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 25 Jan 2016 at 5:44am
|
New score again... http://www.3dmark.com/fs/7326106
 |
Posted By: PetrolHead
Date Posted: 25 Jan 2016 at 5:55am
|
Another silly question: are these all single runs with different setups or do you do several runs on each setup and then select the best? ------------- Ryzen 5 1500X, ASRock AB350M Pro4, 2x8 GB G.Skill Trident Z 3466CL16, Sapphire Pulse RX Vega56 8G HBM2, Corsair RM550x, Samsung 960 EVO SSD (NVMe) 250GB, Samsung 850 EVO SSD 500 GB, Windows 10 64-bit |
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 25 Jan 2016 at 6:03am
|
Not quite sure what you are asking. Hardware is all the same. Just trying different clocks on both gpu and cpu, with a healthy dose of cold air blasting the rad. Had two cores at 0' C and two at 2' C for the cpu, gpu temp was at 6' C for start of run.
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 25 Jan 2016 at 6:17am
|
Gratz on #1 DooRules
|
Posted By: PetrolHead
Date Posted: 25 Jan 2016 at 6:20am
|
Well, like with any other benchmark, there will be some variation between different runs even if you don't change anything. On my system it's roughly 1%, which would on your system mean ~200 points, but I don't know if the variation is directly scalable like that. If you really want to see what the OC is achieving, you should run the test at least a couple of times and see if the average result changes. It's also worth it because you can score extra points "for free". ------------- Ryzen 5 1500X, ASRock AB350M Pro4, 2x8 GB G.Skill Trident Z 3466CL16, Sapphire Pulse RX Vega56 8G HBM2, Corsair RM550x, Samsung 960 EVO SSD (NVMe) 250GB, Samsung 850 EVO SSD 500 GB, Windows 10 64-bit |
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 05 Mar 2016 at 7:56am
Onboard Intel 530 run, thought it would do better... |
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 05 Mar 2016 at 10:10pm
|
1.55 Vc and 1.85 V for memory on gpu http://www.3dmark.com/fs/7788154
 |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 05 Mar 2016 at 11:54pm
|
Awesome score DooRules I am still waiting on getting a board capable of overclocking so I can overclock the crap out of my 6600k and do a few runs ------------- 
|
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 15 Mar 2016 at 11:47pm
Yes, the Firestrike score is amazing, but there is something else amazing lurking in DooRules screenshot. That is this: Yes, an OC of his i7-6700K to 5.1GHz!! That is on his ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ board! This board is really not ASRock's ultimate Skylake board for over clocking. That is the Z170 OC Formula. DooRules, you might want to validate that OC on CPU-Z, just to be... well... validated!! The Core Voltage we can see is actually the VID, which may not be the true VCore. HWiNFO64 will display the true VCore on this board. That is shown under the ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ (Nuvoton NCT6791D) heading. DooRules, what voltage setting in the UEFI were you using for your 5.1GHz OC? That might have been a so called suicide run, but it certainly lasted long enough to run the Firestrike benchmark without crashing, right? IMO, this OC deserves a thread of its own in this sub-forum. ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2016 at 12:40am
Seconded. I totally missed the 5.1ghz CPU-Z screen. Good thing I finally have my new glasses  -------------
|
parsec wrote:Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2016 at 10:03am
|
I validated a better one parsec... the 5.1 is no suicide run, can run it for as long as bench session lasts, no problem, just need cold air I set Vc to 1.5 (max) in bios and then use LLC1 to let the Vc jump during bench runs. It goes to 1.52 Vc and stays there for bench run. By far the best and most stable bios for me at these speeds is 2.31. All others do weird things and don't allow this chip speed. Notice the core temps at 5.15
http://valid.x86.fr/9eiy2k  |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2016 at 1:14pm
|
Are you able to run cinebench at 5.1? -------------
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2016 at 6:42pm
Sure thing, even at 5.15  |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2016 at 6:54pm
|
Mind = Blown For those not familiar with the baselines that score beats out a 6 core 12 thread Xeon and comes within 200 points of a 12 core 24 thread Xeon. I would guess that score is in line with an 8 core 16 thread Xeon with only half the cores/threads. Damn fine score there DooRules. To put things in perspective my i5 6600k @stock scores 606.
-------------
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2016 at 9:48am
|
I think I obviously lucked out with a good chip. That being said I am reasonably confident if I had a bios to allow for more Vc I could get a little more out of her. All comes down to good cooling.
|
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2016 at 1:37pm
|
"All comes down to good cooling". I'll say... I know you use liquid cooling, but did not know your PC is in the same room as your snowmobile. Yes, a VCore of 1.52V is the standard max for your processor. You'd need an override jumper if that is even possible on Skylake. Then again, I doubt you want to ruin that chip. Have you tried to go beyond 5150MHz, and it won't boot, etc? Xaltar, if you knew where DooRules started from in his PC building not long ago, you would be surprised... at first. As I told him, he is back with a vengeance!! ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2016 at 2:12pm
With a vengeance is right  I have always loved overclocking and seeing people achieving these kinds of result really inspire me to push my own systems more. Amusingly I usually only do suicide runs on my systems then run them at or near stock for daily use  I think the most extreme overclock I ever had as a constant setting was my old P4 2.4 Northy that I had running at 3.65ghz the entire time I owned it. Damn now I wanna hear a story about DooRules earliest forays into PC building..... -------------
|
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 21 Mar 2016 at 12:52am
|
Well... while I should let him tell his own story, I can give you the short version. It may not be quite what you are expecting. I "met" DooRules at the OCN SSD sub-forum, a few years ago. He was a hardcore PC builder at that time. I believe it was last year, 2015, that he lost all his PCs in a home fire. The good news is he survived, and is back into the PC building game with his first new build I believe, his ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ board and i7-6700K. You know the rest... ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 21 Mar 2016 at 1:22am
|
Glad to see he bounced back, I am looking forward to seeing more -------------
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 21 Mar 2016 at 10:08am
|
Yup, met parsec when ssd's were still relatively new. I was buying anything new to get higher bench numbers at the time. Only had to read a couple of parsec's posts to realize he had much knowledge on ssd's and pc's in general. A great guy to bounce stuff off. Like me I think parsec is willing to try anything pc wise, no matter how unconventional. Ya never know till ya try in my motto. Last fall lost just about everything in a house fire. About the only thing I didn't lose was a chip and some ram I had loaned out to a buddy. I still have that 3960x chip, and it is a good one. Will do 5.4 all day on cold air. Here is a pic of my last pc I lost in the fire. I could cry just looking at what I lost.   here is the most excellent chip... still the highest clocked 3960x on OCN I believe |
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 21 Mar 2016 at 10:12am
| I did try to post my 6700k at 5.25 parsec. Froze up on last second of windows login screen. 5.2 may be doable if I get a cold enough night, but they are running out fast with spring here. |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 21 Mar 2016 at 3:32pm
|
Damn DooRules, I am so sorry to hear that. What a crying shame, that PC looked insane I think I have even seen it on OCN before, I am not as active there as I once was but still drop in from time to time. -------------
|
Posted By: parsec
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2016 at 11:20pm
|
DooRules, thanks for your comments! Your picture of that PC is unreal! I can imagine giving it to your insurance company as proof of what you lost, and their reaction when they saw it. "So your PC was attached to a bicycle frame, and the built in fire extinguishers did not work?" OH NO, spring is coming, and the end of extreme over clocking!! May I ask if you're one of those guys that orders say, five or ten of the same CPU, and cherry picks the best one for over clocking? I'm thinking you don't. (I know SSDs went in and out of your PCs like a revolving door, but not with the cherry picking thing... HEY, just had an idea... )Which means it is possible to achieve great over clocks with random processors, the silicone lottery is just an excuse for failures! Xaltar, using the fastest SSDs as the OS drive is one of his over clocking secrets! Boot that OS up before it BSODs! ------------- http://valid.x86.fr/48rujh" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2016 at 11:58pm
love it-------------
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 26 Mar 2016 at 5:27am
|
I have never ordered multiple chips to cherry pick the best. Same goes for gpu's. Just go with the silicon lottery and do my best. And yes I am running out of cold days, lol. I can already see lower clocks because it is not so cold out. On another note, lost my gpu this morning. Would not post. Already have a cross shipped rma from EVGA on the way. Man there service is second to none. Dam board looks naked without gpu. Thankfully the onboard is working fine and I am up and running. Take about a week for that gpu to get to me. Then more testing with a new gpu, woohoo. This will the last time i am outcored so to speak when it comes to gpu benching. Bring on the 10 core 6950x beast. Gonna get me one them brutes.
|
Posted By: DooRules
Date Posted: 22 Sep 2016 at 4:37am
all same just went from 980 ti KP to Titan XP |
Posted By: BullyApC
Date Posted: 06 Nov 2016 at 12:06pm
|
4790k @4.5 16g Gskill DDR3 @2000 3 250 GB EVO 850's Z97 Killer GTX 1080 FTW @ stock clock CoolerMaster Hyper 212 EVO  |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 21 Jun 2017 at 12:45am
|
My poor old GTX 960, still able to top the charts after all this time: http://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search/cpugpu/fs/P/2227/1010/8099?minScore=7200&cpuName=AMD Ryzen 5 1600X&gpuName=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 It doesn't mean much anymore sadly. Not that many people with Ryzen systems will still be using one -------------
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 21 Jun 2017 at 2:56pm
4GHZ Club ! |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 21 Jun 2017 at 4:05pm
|
I managed a Firestrike run at 4.1 but got a BSOD on the CPU test hehe. -------------
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 22 Jun 2017 at 7:37pm
|
Latest of mine, up from 15,003 15,158 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12936422" rel="nofollow - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12936422 From now on I will be including my System tweaks for how I arrived at the scores I do. I hope these tweaks help someone. If they do, I'd appreciate knowing they did by posting so. https://valid.x86.fr/w1cqpq ASRock X370 Killer SLI/ac(rev 1.03) BIOS 2.50(AGESA 1.0.0.6) Ryzen 1500X @ 3.9GHZ, 1.38125 vCore(Fixed, LLC 3), 1.10 SoC(Fixed, LLC 3), Memory Training:Off procODT:53.3 CMK16GX4M2B3600C18(Samsung B-die ICs) @ 3200, 16-17-17-17-35 1T(Auto), 1.375 MEM VDDIO, 0.690 MEM VTT STRIX-GTX1070-O8G-GAMING Cursair H115i, Antec SpotCool over the VRMs Windows 10 Pro Creators Ed. 1703 Build 15063.413 |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 22 Jun 2017 at 7:46pm
|
Awesome score there Wardog Any overclock on your GPU there? -------------
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 22 Jun 2017 at 7:52pm
Thx Xaltar. OC my GPU. Ha! I spend so much time in the BIOS, I'm ashamed to state I don't know how. Not a clue |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 22 Jun 2017 at 7:56pm
|
3rd highest score for your setup with a stock GPU hehehe epic! MSI Afterburner then take a look at google for the amount most people push the Core and Memory with your GPU. Generally I bump the core 10mhz at a time till I lose stability (artifacting or crashing) then drop back 20mhz. Then set core back to default and repeat for Memory but 50mhz at a time. Once done combine the two and see if you are stable. If not drop down on the memory 10-20mhz then core 10-20mhz till all is buttery :) -------------
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 22 Jun 2017 at 8:42pm
These #'s help a lot! This is up from the 308 I posted you know where. Note too, the below at 3200 is better than the 3333 I posted there. Hours and hours spent in the BIOS and benching to get these #'s.  edited; add "Note too, the below at 3200 is better than the 3333 I posted there." |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 22 Jun 2017 at 11:10pm
Done did....... I guess. My compliments to Nate152, Moderator on the ROG Forum. 15,831 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/20615141" rel="nofollow - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12937883 |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 22 Jun 2017 at 11:20pm
Bwahahahaha Numero Uno! By a whopping 474pts over 2nd place. http://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search/cpugpu/fs/P/2229/1090/500000?minScore=0&cpuName=AMD%20Ryzen%205%201500X&gpuName=NVIDIA%20GeForce%20GTX%201070 |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 22 Jun 2017 at 11:24pm
|
Awesome! -------------
|
Posted By: BoneCrusherXes
Date Posted: 24 Jun 2017 at 9:45pm
|
gratz wardog, great score!
encouraged me to do some runs, started at ~16k ... after some ram tweaking and powerplan changes i was able to reach 17.463 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12955623" rel="nofollow - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12955623 ------------- ASRock X370 Taichi, AMD Ryzen 7 1700X @ 3,9 , Noctua NH-D15 2x16GB G.Skill F4-3200C14D-32GTZ @3200 14-13-13-26-42 1T GearDown Enabled MSI Geforce GTX 1070 GAMING X 8G |
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 24 Jun 2017 at 10:23pm
Damn dude. Great Physics score. Comparing ours, WTF have you done to have gotten that much higher than mine in the Physics Test? Or maybe just the diff in processors? Trounced me! http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/12955623/fs/12943219# |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 24 Jun 2017 at 10:57pm
|
Firestrike likes cores Wish my GPU was a 1070 too then I would be somewhere between you both and we could see how much difference 2 cores makes from 4 - 6 - 8. That would be interesting. -------------
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 24 Jun 2017 at 11:36pm
I've done some research since posting that. You are correct. His Physics diff is due to 4 more cores. https://www.overclock3d.net/news/cpu_mainboard/amd_ryzen_3dmark_physic_score_leaks/1
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 25 Jun 2017 at 5:49am
|
I used all of these when they were current I remember getting the 3dmark 99 demo on a cover disk from a PC magazine and being utterly dissapointed with my scores -------------
|
Posted By: BoneCrusherXes
Date Posted: 25 Jun 2017 at 7:46am
Yep, indeed. But i have to say the system turned out to be not fully stable with the settings used for the 3DMark run So my stable score will probably be lower, got ~17.100 earlier today. I will have to test more. on the on hand the X370 Gaming X is better with RAM than the K4, but i currently have trouble getting the CPU fully stable @ speeds > 3,7ghz ------------- ASRock X370 Taichi, AMD Ryzen 7 1700X @ 3,9 , Noctua NH-D15 2x16GB G.Skill F4-3200C14D-32GTZ @3200 14-13-13-26-42 1T GearDown Enabled MSI Geforce GTX 1070 GAMING X 8G |
Posted By: SerpentXSF
Date Posted: 28 Jun 2017 at 1:43am
|
Here is my score. System Specs: CPU: Intel 7700k 5 Ghz Motherboard: ASRock Z270 Taichi RAM: G.skill TridentZ RGB 3200 x 4, 8 Gb GPU: Aorus 1080 Ti SSD: 960 Evo x2 Raid 0 PSU: Corsair HX750 Cooling: Corsair H100i V2 Case: Thermaltake Urban S31 Firestrike score: 22697 Validation: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5403158" rel="nofollow - http://hwbot.org/submission/3574091_serpentxsf_3dmark___fire_strike_geforce_gtx_1080_ti_22697_marks http://hwbot.org/image/1857144.jpg  ------------- SerpentX Z270 Taich, Intel 7700k G.Skill TridentZ 3200 960 Evo and 850 Evo Aorus 1080 Ti 
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 03 Jul 2017 at 7:27pm
|
Some more tweaking tonigh but I don't think she's go much more to give. 16,441 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/13030306" rel="nofollow - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/13030306 ASRock Killer SLI/ac rev1.03 BIOS 2.50 Ryzen 1500X @ 4.0GHz Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3600C18 3200MHz 16-17-17-17-35-58 1T ASUS STRIX GTX 1070 STRIX-GTX1070-O8G-GAMING GPU Boost 1930 GPU Voltage 100% Memory Clock 9470 Fan Speed User Defined Power Target 120% |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 03 Jul 2017 at 7:38pm
|
Damn Wardog, you are beating a lot of scores from people using the GTX 1070 and a 6 core 12 thread CPU This guy is number 46 using a 1600x and 1070: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12501388 You have gotten almost 4 threads worth of extra performance out of your system with overclocking -------------
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 21 Oct 2017 at 11:11pm
|
" rel="nofollow - https://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search/cpugpu/fs/P/2227/1010/7199?minScore=6300&cpuName=AMD Ryzen 5 1600X&gpuName=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 Still sitting at number one with my hardware combo (GTX 960 + 1600x) -------------
|
Posted By: wardog
Date Posted: 22 Oct 2017 at 12:27am
Awesome Xaltar |
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 22 Oct 2017 at 12:55am
|
I try to hate on my GTX 960 but I just can't. This thing may not be fast but it has consistently topped benchmarks against other 960s since day one. It plays everything at great FPS with decent quality settings, what more could I need Soon time for an upgrade though. -------------
|
Posted By: Annihilator
Date Posted: 26 Feb 2019 at 11:39pm
|
2700X unleashed: https://www.3dmark.com/fs/18377288 ------------- AMD Ryzen 2700X @ 4.5GHz AC ASRock Fatal1ty AB350 Gaming-ITX Gigabyte Aorus Xtreme 1080 Ti @ 2063/6318MHz 2x8GB G.Skill TridentZ 4266 C19 @ 3600 C14 @ 57.5ns |
Posted By: gizmic
Date Posted: 11 Dec 2019 at 5:33pm
|
lol @ top 1 with these specs didnt even bother closing apps should be able to hit 20k in a real bench run 19647 https://www.3dmark.com/fs/21146965 AMD 3950X 8GBX2 G.Skill Trident Z 3533mhz CL 14 (tweaking) Inno3D 1070Ti X2 Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate Custom Water Cooling Kit powered by Bitspower Western Digital GOLD 2TB Raid 0 Samsung 970 EVO M.2 Samsung 860 EVO 500GB RAID 0 Corsair AX860i ------------- 
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 11 Dec 2019 at 5:49pm
|
Nice setup Gizmic, hows the 3950x treating you? -------------
|
Posted By: gizmic
Date Posted: 11 Dec 2019 at 6:43pm
|
per normal use doesn't feel any difference coming from 2700X but for streaming yeah its alot stronger plus the ram mhz cap on the previous gen that i had (3433). i'll be splitting the cpu to 3 OS someday -------------
|
Posted By: Animeleptic
Date Posted: 09 Jan 2020 at 2:13pm
|
Score: 26648 https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/42813330 AMD Ryzen 3950x Asrock X570 Aqua G.Skill Trident Z Royal CL14 3600 / 3800 OC (4 x 8GB) RTX 2070 Super Ventus OC Dual EK 280 Rad Dual D5 pumps (EK-XTOP) Dual Corsair SF750 PSU All EK plumbing Custom built case for horizontal orientation of GPU (upright) and Mobo |
Posted By: gizmic
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2020 at 2:04am
|
maxed out 20251 https://www.3dmark.com/fs/21196957 waiting on the rtx 30 :D -------------
|
Posted By: Xaltar
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2020 at 4:03am
|
Nice scores Gizmic and Animeleptic -------------
|