ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical Support > Intel Motherboards
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Z170 tech specs
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

Z170 tech specs

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
vannex View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote vannex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Z170 tech specs
    Posted: 23 Oct 2015 at 8:34am
Parsec - fair enough.  I suppose it was a little harsh of me to claim false advertising.

The issue is really that the x16/x8/etc. terminology is being used to describe both physical slot size as well as the number of lanes a slot supports electrically.  In its advertising, a marketer will of course choose its wording to maximize the perceived value of their product.  In this case, stating the physical slot size creates a higher perceived value ("2 x16 slots" vs. "1 x16 slot and 1 x8 slot").

A similar situation exists with hard drive storage capacities.  For example, a capacity of 2 trillion bytes can be represented as "2 TB" or "1.8" TB, because TB is ambiguous.  Again, marketers will use the measure which maximizes consumers' perceived value.  Thankfully, we now have the standardized binary prefixes which were introduced to eliminate this ambiguity (1.8 TiB is approximately 2 trillion bytes, and 2 TB is 2 trillion bytes).

It really comes down to the consumer being informed about what they are buying.  I guess that's why we have forums like this one! Smile
Back to Top
Xaltar View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 16 May 2015
Location: Europe
Status: Online
Points: 25028
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Xaltar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Oct 2015 at 2:10am
I think Parsec hit the nail on the head. These restrictions come from the architecture which no board manufacturer can really change without adding significant cost to the product. Repeated testing has been performed with each successive generation of graphics cards and PCIe iterations and in all cases it has been shown that 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes are not fully saturated by any current gen consumer grade GPUs. This trend goes back to PCIe 1.0 and the GPUs available when the standard was current. AMD even allows crossfire with PCIe x4 being provided to the second GPU and so far as I have seen, even when it does bottleneck the GPU the bottleneck is small on high end GPUs and non existent on midrange GPUs.

If anyone wants more PCIe lanes available they have to be willing to fork out for enthusiast platforms.
Back to Top
parsec View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4996
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote parsec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Oct 2015 at 1:44am
Originally posted by vannex vannex wrote:

Short answer: No, you can't connect your GPU to any of the "x16" slots.
 
Long answer: Be careful regarding multiple PCIe x16 slots!  In fact only 1 is a true x16 slot.  The rest are made to look like x16 but they are actually x8 or lower.  When you look closely at the board you can see that the pins are actually missing from the slots.  In my opinion it's false advertising - take a closer look at the specs.  I copied this from the Extreme7+ specs page:
 
- 4 x PCI Express 3.0 x16 Slots (PCIE2/PCIE4/PCIE6: single at x16 (PCIE2); dual at x8 (PCIE2) / x8 (PCIE4); triple at x8 (PCIE2) / x4 (PCIE4) / x4 (PCIE6). PCIE3: x4 mode)*


You are correct about the difference between the physical slot size (x16) and the electrical connections of each physical x16 slot. But limitations of the Z170 platform are factors in the number of PCIe 3.0 lanes assigned to each slot.

Skylake processors provide just 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes, so providing all 16 lanes to every x16 slot has limited significance.

A two video card SLI or CrossFire configuration results in eight PCIe 3.0 lanes for each card. Three card Crossfire further reduces the maximum lanes available for each card.

If each x16 slot had 16 PCIe 3.0 lane connections, the ability to assign lanes to each x16 slot is required. That adds complexity and cost to a mother board. That flexibility would be nice, but is the additional cost worth it for every owner, given only 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes are available?

Physical x16 slots must be used regardless of the number of PCIe 3.0 lanes available. Otherwise how can x16 physical cards be used in a physical x8 or x4 slot?

To quote the specs again, "4 x PCI Express 3.0 x16 Slots (PCIE2/PCIE4/PCIE6: single at x16 (PCIE2); dual at x8 (PCIE2) / x8 (PCIE4); triple at x8 (PCIE2) / x4 (PCIE4) / x4 (PCIE6). PCIE3: x4 mode).

Note that the word Slots is used, which is a physical description. We may interpret x16 slot as also describing the electrical connections used, but is that truly correct? IMO, no.

So is this false advertising? Or a less than accurate interpretation by the reader?

Can we connect a video card to any of the x16 slots? Yes we can. But the number of PCIe 3.0 lanes available electrically in each x16 slot varies both by the design of the board and the number of video cards being used.

Will a video card's performance be reduced when fewer than 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes are available to the card? The general consensus is eight PCIe 3.0 lanes for most if not all current video cards does not limit performance by a significant amount, if at all. Only four PCIe 3.0 lanes will reduce performance.

The number of PCIe lanes available on "Mainstream" and "Performance" Intel platforms, which includes Z170 boards, is nothing new and has been 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes since Ivy Bridge. PC builders should be familiar with these specifications and the limitations of PCIe lane to PCIe slot assignments.
Back to Top
Xaltar View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 16 May 2015
Location: Europe
Status: Online
Points: 25028
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Xaltar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Oct 2015 at 9:40pm
Agreed on the colors, the extreme 7+ would be my board of choice too if I were to make the jump to skylake now.
Back to Top
ASRock Expert View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 220
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ASRock Expert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Oct 2015 at 6:12am
If You ask me, I like the Ex7 more than the OC-F.
Why? Colors are great, and the layout is similar.

There will be no difference if You don't overclock on DICE/LN2,
and use 1-2 GPU's.
990FX Extreme 9 MOD P1.70
AMD FX 8120 4GHz 1.25V
Thermalright HR-02
Patriot Viper 2x4GB 2133MHz
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
MSI R7970 TFIII 3GB
CORSAIR VX550W
LanCool K62 Dragonlord
ASUS Xonar D2X
Back to Top
filips View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 19 Oct 2015
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote filips Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Oct 2015 at 5:56am
Yes, PCIe 3.1 was only on a graphics:) I took extreme7+, it may be an overkill but I like it a lot. Thanks guys!
Back to Top
vannex View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote vannex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Oct 2015 at 10:55pm
Short answer: No, you can't connect your GPU to any of the "x16" slots.
 
Long answer: Be careful regarding multiple PCIe x16 slots!  In fact only 1 is a true x16 slot.  The rest are made to look like x16 but they are actually x8 or lower.  When you look closely at the board you can see that the pins are actually missing from the slots.  In my opinion it's false advertising - take a closer look at the specs.  I copied this from the Extreme7+ specs page:
 
- 4 x PCI Express 3.0 x16 Slots (PCIE2/PCIE4/PCIE6: single at x16 (PCIE2); dual at x8 (PCIE2) / x8 (PCIE4); triple at x8 (PCIE2) / x4 (PCIE4) / x4 (PCIE6). PCIE3: x4 mode)*
Back to Top
filips View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 19 Oct 2015
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote filips Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Oct 2015 at 11:26pm
Thanks for information. I think I will chose extreme7+, it's very good mobo and in some reviews it reaches 5.0GHz with 6700k. The primary reason is the ability to add/remove RAM sticks without removing GPU (with LC block and tubes it may be impractical) even if GPU has big backplate.
Thanks again!


Edit: I'm really curious about the place GPU in PCIe slots. If there are many PCIe 16x can I connect GPU to random slot and should it work? I read many posts about it and there were diverse opinions.


Edited by filips - 20 Oct 2015 at 12:46am
Back to Top
Xaltar View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 16 May 2015
Location: Europe
Status: Online
Points: 25028
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Xaltar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Oct 2015 at 9:49pm
I see what you mean by the shroud. I would imagine it should still fit. Even if it does not you can easily remove the shroud and if necessary trim it down a little, though I am not sure how that may effect the warranty. By the look of it and blowing up the image to near enough scale it should accommodate my GTX 960 G1 Gaming's backplate. 

Edited by Xaltar - 19 Oct 2015 at 9:49pm
Back to Top
filips View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 19 Oct 2015
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote filips Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Oct 2015 at 7:33pm
Thanks for rapid response, but I still have objections about space for backplate.
Here is image from official ASRock site, on which I showed places where (in my opinion) backplate may not be able to fit or may block RAM slots.
Green - line of pci-e slot
Red - mentioned places



Orginal photo from ASR: http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/Z170%20OC%20Formula/

I know it's only photo and I didn't have this mobo in my hands, but there is lack of space. If you saw it and there is more space than it looks like please tell me. I read that placing gpu in second slot sometimes may cause some problems because bios doesn't read it properly.

Extreme7+ also is great OC mobo but there is no clear CMOS button, which is very useful.

BTW. Is there a noticable difference between PCIe 3.1 and PCIe 3.0 for normal user like I am?

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.250 seconds.