A Z170 Extreme6+ With a Z170 Extreme 4 Bios |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
wardog
Moderator Group Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 28 Jun 2016 at 2:34pm |
No soldering req'd.
They're socketed and thus pull up and out, then carefully press the new ones back in. |
|
Jeff G
Newbie Joined: 27 Jun 2016 Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My solder skills are not up to the task of replacing those chips. The board is less than a week old, I'd prefer a new board over soldering. I was hoping they could have sent me an unlocked bios I could flash to them to get it over to ex6+ bios but they just told me to return it as defective instead.
|
|
wardog
Moderator Group Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Definitely has an Extreme6+.
Battery position relative to the cpu socket, and two cha fan headers right next to. Odd thing is the silkscreened AMD and Crossfire logos . RMA it or request two BIOS chips from ASRock now that you've documented it. |
|
Jeff G
Newbie Joined: 27 Jun 2016 Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Its the Ex6+ board for sure, and it definitely came from AsRock with Ex4 bios. This should be a cut and dry case of defective product, I'm hoping its an easy swap. |
|
parsec
Moderator Group Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 4996 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Given the OP's picture of the board, it is definitely a Z170 Extreme6+
After looking at the picture on the Z170 Extreme6+ product page on ASRock's website, they match perfectly in many major details I can see. If you then look at the Z170 Extreme4's product page picture, IMO the Extreme4 board is not just a relabeled version of the Extreme6+. First, the Z170 Extreme6+: Second, the Z170 Extreme4: Check some details on the "bottom" of each picture, really the right side of each board when mounted in a PC case. The Extreme4 immediately above, has a CHA_FAN2 header next to the BIOS Select switch. The Extreme6+ does not have the CHA_FAN2 header in that location. Back to the Extreme4, we see a single piece, multi-SATA ports and SATA Express connector. The Extreme6+ has that same connector, and four more SATA ports just to the right of that connector. The Extreme4 does not have four SATA ports in that location. That's only a few of the MANY differences I see between the pictures of these two boards. I could go on and on, the Extreme4 has a four pin fan header where the Extreme6 has the four extra SATA ports. How could you do things like that with the same basic board? Just look at the area around the battery in each board, very different. The Extreme6+ has two four pin fan headers next to the battery, and many small chips above and below the battery. The Extreme4 is relatively clean with very few parts around the battery, and no fan headers in that area. The location of the battery itself is different on each board. So IMO we can say the two boards are different, and not just a relabel job. Back to the main issue, the Extreme4 UEFI version in a Extreme6+ board. Given the evidence we have, the OP's two pictures, it seems the board was originally flashed with the Z170 Extreme4 UEFI version at the factory. Given the specs, the UEFI chips are the same size, but are wrong in the sense they have the wrong board's UEFI version. And no, I have never seen this before. I don't know how the manufacturing works, if pre-flashed UEFI chips are inserted in the board, or the board is actually flashed with a UEFI version with empty UEFI chips. Another question is how a board identifies itself, where is that information stored and can it be changed? Regardless, I would suggest returning the board to the retailer. It might be hard to convince them that the situation you have exists, and is not something we can fix. I don't know if replacing the UEFI chips with an Extreme6+ UEFI version in each one will fix the problem. I do think that a board with the wrong firmware would be likely to not function correctly in several if not many aspects. I would personally not try a salvage it. Another clue or indication of the factory problem: The stickers on the UEFI chips should say 2.40 on them, right? That is the UEFI version the board came with, right? The Extreme6+ does not have a 2.40 UEFI version. The Extreme4 does. Check the BIOS download list of each board. Sometimes UEFI versions are removed from a board's list, so this check may not be 100% perfect in all cases. The dates of similar UEFI version numbers for each board are not close in their dates. |
|
Jeff G
Newbie Joined: 27 Jun 2016 Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Spoke to AsRock directly via the phone, he told me it isnt possible to load a P2.40 bios onto an Extreme6+ board (I assure you, it seems to be working just fine). So, they're calling it defective and now I get to deal with Neweggs terrible rma process. It's just not worth risking issues down the road with Ex4 bios on an Ex6+ board. Thanks for the help everyone!
|
|
LutaWicasa
Newbie Joined: 27 Jun 2016 Status: Offline Points: 21 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
In the original post I mentioned he had tried the internet auto flash...it did and is now on the 3.20 for the Extreme 4
|
|
Xaltar
Moderator Group Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 25283 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It's definitely the Extreme 6+ not an Extreme 4 mislabeled so it must have been fitted with the wrong BIOS. In your pics there appears to be a sticker over the screen printed text for the model but I suspect it probably says Extreme 6 as they are both based on the same PCB. The fact that it has the sticker though leads me to believe it is an early production model (old stock).
I would return it to be on the safe side. Weird things happen sometimes and aside from the novelty of having an odd product they are really annoying. The last thing you want is to discover your board uses some strange hybrid BIOS that you can never update. Maybe try flash it with the Extreme 4 latest BIOS? Cancel the flash before it begins, just check and see if the image is found.
|
|
|
|
Jeff G
Newbie Joined: 27 Jun 2016 Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It's new, ordered 6 days ago and received 2 days ago. I'm hoping AsRock will get back to me and it will be a simple reflash of the bios. Aside from the fact that I don't want to tear my system back a part, I hate dealing with Newegg's RMA process and really don't wan to be without a board for the next several weeks.
|
|
clubfoot
Newbie Joined: 28 Mar 2016 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 246 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Correct-a-mundo! Which is why I said it may also have been shipped with the incorrect BIOS chips,... Of course if the board works you could live with it,...but I would send it back to the retailer if it is new or RMA it.
|
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |