ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical Support > Intel Motherboards
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - extreme 4 / z97x killer and usb 3.1/c
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

extreme 4 / z97x killer and usb 3.1/c

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
hellazari View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 11 Jul 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hellazari Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: extreme 4 / z97x killer and usb 3.1/c
    Posted: 12 Jul 2015 at 7:01pm
First, Thank you very much for all your help!

Dont know why I wrote 0.8, I geuss wanted to write 8Gbit.

Thanks again!
Back to Top
parsec View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4996
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote parsec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Jul 2015 at 1:30pm
Originally posted by hellazari hellazari wrote:

yes, thats what I thought, thanks for clearing that out.

but what about the extreme 6 board?

he has a pcie 2.0 x16 slot which runs at x2 and from my understanding this slot is not affecting the 2 pcie 3.0 x16 slots speed.

can i fit the USB 3.1 card into the pcie 2.0 x16 slot and the GPU will still run at X16 speed? 
if yes, pcie 2.0 at x2 speed is 0.8Gbit speed so this slot will bottleneck the card  I guess.


Again you are correct.

The PCIe 2.0 x16 slot (x2 lanes) is provided by the Z97 chipset, not the CPU. So using that slot will not use any of the PCIe 3.0 lanes, and all will be available to the video card(s).

Another thing to know is the exact specs of the USB 3.1 card, which can be seen here:

http://www.asrock.com/mb/spec/card.asp?Model=USB%203.1/A%2bC

Note that this card is physically x4, but is x2 electrically, so uses only two lanes.

I don't know why you said PCIe 2.0 x2 speed is 0.8Gbits, since one PCIe 2.0 lane is supposed to be 4Gbit/s max effective transfer rate, taking into account overhead.

The card will be slightly bottlenecked when used in a PCIe 2.0 lane slot, since that would not provide the 10Gbit/s (or more) speed that two PCIe 3.0 lanes would provide.
Back to Top
hellazari View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 11 Jul 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hellazari Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Jul 2015 at 2:06am
thats mostly right, but not always, on some games it has big impacts even on gtx 980, which im planning to get, as you can see here:

anyway im more worried about SLI. 

do you have info about what i asked regarding the extreme 6?


Edited by hellazari - 12 Jul 2015 at 2:07am
Back to Top
Xaltar View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 16 May 2015
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 24653
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Xaltar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Jul 2015 at 1:49am
At present, there are no GPUs that can fully saturate PCIE 3.0 x8, at least that is what benchmarks are showing. I think the closest to doing this is the Titan Z. PCIE 3.0 x8 is more or less = to PCIE 2.0 x16 in bandwidth. 
Back to Top
hellazari View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 11 Jul 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hellazari Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Jul 2015 at 12:46am
yes, thats what I thought, thanks for clearing that out.

but what about the extreme 6 board?

he has a pcie 2.0 x16 slot which runs at x2 and from my understanding this slot is not affecting the 2 pcie 3.0 x16 slots speed.

can i fit the USB 3.1 card into the pcie 2.0 x16 slot and the GPU will still run at X16 speed? 
if yes, pcie 2.0 at x2 speed is 0.8Gbit speed so this slot will bottleneck the card  I guess.
Back to Top
parsec View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4996
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote parsec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Jul 2015 at 12:22am
Yes you are right about both situations.

All the socket 1150 processors you could use with those boards have 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes. That is a limitation we can blame on Intel. Angry

So strictly speaking it's not really the use of more than one PCIe 3.0 x16 slot that limits a single video card to x8 (although the result is the same), but the amount of PCIe 3.0 lanes that are available.

Regardless, your descriptions are just as accurate about the final results.

Most gamers say that running a single video card at PCIe 3.0 x8 does not reduce performance much if at all. The SLI situation is not the same.
Back to Top
hellazari View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 11 Jul 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hellazari Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Jul 2015 at 8:03pm
just small question to see if i get it right,

if i get the extreme 4 / z97x killer which bundled with a pcie x4 card with usb 3.1 and usb c port, that will mean that my gpu will run forever at x8 because this card is plugged into a pciex16 slot?

and what about sli? the gpu's will run at X8 and X4 instead of X8 and X8 because all the 3 pciex16 slots are used?

will be glad for some clarification ,

thanks!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.233 seconds.