![]() |
Z170 Extreme4, m.2, etc. troubles |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Author | |
AlexF ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 28 Feb 2016 Location: Earth Status: Offline Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Also here are the speeds I'm getting to quantify what "slow" is: http://i65.tinypic.com/33biosg.jpg This is out of Samsung Magician 4.9.5 running on Win10 Pro 64-bit (10.0.10586) As you can see the writes both are very good. The sequential read is about 10-15% slower than I would expect....however, the random read is TERRIBLE. Edited by AlexF - 28 Feb 2016 at 9:31pm |
|
![]() |
|
AlexF ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 28 Feb 2016 Location: Earth Status: Offline Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for your input. You guys have some pretty good information in this thread and, for example, it was a good find that Christer noticed this is temporarily alleviated by sleep/wake-up. Not sure I would have thought of that if I didn't see his post about that.
Yes, maybe a problem with the 950 Pro, but there are also a lot of similarities to my setup and Christers. Both running Win10 64-bit, and both motherboards on the Z170 chipset, etc. It is a bit weird removing 2 of his 4 RAM sticks fixed his problem. I am only using 2 sticks, 2x8 GB as you can see, and it's 3200 DDR4 which is specifically meant for the Z170. I'm wondering if I'm going to just have to wait this one out for something like a new BIOS update, an updated NMVe driver, a chipset driver update, etc. I have turned off all power management settings and even called Samsung late last week and talked to their support. I checked everything that they wanted me to and they still weren't able to figure out what it was. Similar to my experience as one of the first people to get a SSD when they came out, this may just be the temporary price I have to pay for being a relatively early adopter of M.2 NMVe technology :(
|
|
![]() |
|
parsec ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 4996 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for this information. Sorry you have this problem, but that it happens on another manufacture's mother board makes this issue a potential problem with the 950 Pro itself. I'm NOT saying I know this is true, but if we see more cases of this on other boards, that puts the drive itself into doubt. |
|
![]() |
|
parsec ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 4996 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
UGH, ASMedia SATA chipset... ![]() Some mother board manufactures suggest not using optical drives on the ASMedia SATA ports. Now you can see why. I had the 840 Pro I used in my crazy RAID 0 array connected to the ASMedia SATA chipset a while ago. I could not run AS SSD on it, it would fail with some error I've never seen before. Plus running the Win 10 manual TRIM feature on it would never finish, and I had to kill the the Properties process with Task Manager. The TRIMcheck program would hang when I tried to test TRIM on the ASMedia chipset. I've tried both an ASMedia driver and the generic Windows AHCI driver, no difference. I suppose you can use HDDs on the ASMedia chipset, but if I can't get a TRIMcheck or manual TRIM to complete on it, how can I trust using an SSD on it? I should say that about two years ago, the new (at the time) Intel IRST RAID driver had some kind of interaction with the ASMedia chipset that caused problems with the IRST Windows program. It would not run at all. I suppose the problems I see with the ASMedia chipset MIGHT be related to the IRST RAID driver, but I don't really know. How could this still be a problem years later? |
|
![]() |
|
AlexF ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 28 Feb 2016 Location: Earth Status: Offline Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am having the same problem Christer has. My read speeds are too slow (especially random read). The speed jumps remarkably for a seconds when I put the computer to sleep and then wake it back up and immediately run the Samsung Magician benchmark test -- but then it drops to being slow again. I installed all the latest chipset drivers and the Samsung NMVe driver. My memory is running at 3200, I have a SATA SSD and SATA HDD plugged in as well.
My setup is: GIGABYTE GA-Z170N-WIFI (rev. 1.0) LGA 1151 Intel Z170 HDMI SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 Mini ITX Intel Motherboard + Intel Core i5-6500 6M Skylake Quad-Core 3.2 GHz LGA 1151 65W BX80662I56500 Desktop Processor Intel HD Graphics 530 + G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 3200 (PC4 25600) Intel Z170 Platform Desktop Memory Model F4-3200C16D-16GVK + SAMSUNG 950 PRO M.2 256GB PCI-Express 3.0 x4 Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) MZ-V5P256BW
Edited by AlexF - 28 Feb 2016 at 11:38am |
|
![]() |
|
netjrb ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 09 Feb 2016 Status: Offline Points: 15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Guys,
Finally found stability on my motherboard. The issue was having two Blu-ray drives hooked to the ASMedia SATA ports. Once I disconnected them I was stable. Swapped them over to Intel SATA ports and still stable. Mushu, Did you have any Blu-ray or DVD drives hooked to your ASMedia ports? |
|
![]() |
|
parsec ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 4996 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sorry, I meant to reply to your question a day or two ago... ![]() I'm still using 2.50, with my Z170 Extreme7+ board. I've never had the random hangs in Windows you mentioned, and have run the Magician software many times, no problem. I've used almost every UEFI version our board has, including some of the no longer available Betas. I have an early production board that came with 1.40. Hard for me to say which version is the "best", since I never thought I had problems in Windows related to the UEFI version. But, I would suggest version 2.10 due to its update of the Intel RAID Option ROM and EFI driver. The EFI driver is used by PCIe SSDs, and the RAID Option ROM update has bug fixes for PCIe SSD RAID support. The IRST driver (version 14) that provides RAID support for PCIe SSDs is in its infancy, and while IMO it is not as good as it could/should be, I can't criticize it too much. It's a one of its kind software for PCs, and manages to work with multiple protocols (SATA and NVMe) at the same time. Quite an accomplishment by Intel, and provided free to us, if we purchase the appropriate platform. ![]() We cannot forget ASRock in this as well, since they provide most of the few boards that let us use this capability. ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
netjrb ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 09 Feb 2016 Status: Offline Points: 15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Parsec,
What BIOS version are you using? Thanks.
|
|
![]() |
|
parsec ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 4996 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for posting what you discovered. That is quite strange that your memory caused the problem, I don't have an explanation for it... yet. The memory controller is in the CPU, and the M.2 slot uses the DMI3 lanes from the Z170 chipset. Whatever interaction (or bug) is involved is more complex than meets the eye. I tried creating a RAID 0 array of SATA SSDs on my Z170 Extreme7+ board to see if that caused the problem. It doesn't seem to make any difference on my board, and I am using two M.2 SSDs, a 950 Pro and an SM951. ![]() This is a very special RAID 0 volume, composed of a Samsung 840 Pro and a Crucial M4, two completely different SSDs that share nothing besides being SSDs. The result surprised me, I ran the benchmark twice with the same general results: ![]() The 4K write speed is surprising, and does not seem to be a fluke. The M4 limits the sequential write speed, but otherwise this is a good result, with excellent 4K write speed. Don't let anyone tell you that mixing two different SSDs in RAID 0 is not a good idea. Frankly I've never done this before now, I'm still not sure how I feel about it... ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Christer703 ![]() Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Feb 2016 Location: Norway Status: Offline Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Okay so i have found the source of the problem for me.
After a lot of testing i found out that by removing 2 of the 4 ram sticks (HyperX Fury 2666MHz 4x4GB), my ultra m2 port runs at PCIe 3.0 mode with full speeds all the time working exactly as its suppose to do. So either it is something with the bios that causes this problem or it is something wrong with the motherboard. I have tested the Ram so this is not the issue alone, however there might be a problem with this exact type of ram in combination with this motherboard. I am in contact with Asrock Support about this and will post the answer as soon as i get it. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |