![]() |
unusual crashing |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Author | |
wardog ![]() Moderator Group ![]() Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Those count towards you saying a graphics card was changed. That 390(x) req's a stout PSU rated at 750-800W. And we're not talking an inexpensive PSU either. Not for that GC and X99 board/proc. No no. No Sir. Edited by wardog - 07 Nov 2016 at 1:09pm |
|
![]() |
|
wardog ![]() Moderator Group ![]() Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What make, model, and size is your PSU and how old is it?
Applies to/depends on your above answer: PCIE_PWR1. Above the topmost PCIe slot directly in the corner created by the PCIe slot and the 4 mem banks is a female 4-pin molex that will provide power to the bus to stabilize it. BUT, remember, as PSU's age they inherently loose performance and fall out of spec. Out of spec ie: drooping rails, less overhead, generate more heat causing internal rise of resistance leading to overall poor performance, etc etc. Windows 7 ISO's https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows7 Windows USB/DVD Download Tool - To put an ISO to USB to install https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/windows-usb-dvd-download-tool |
|
![]() |
|
sadkkf ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 06 Nov 2016 Status: Offline Points: 25 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've always thought a DRE was from the OS, too. The thing is, I've had this problem with the original HDD installed. That was an older drive from my old system so when I got the error I thought the drive needed replacing. That's when I bought the new SSD. Now it's happening with the SSD. It could be the OS because I used the same disc to install both. I doubt the drive is at fault. This is also Win 7 Pro, not 10, so the anniversary update didn't affect me. To recap what I've done... Built the original config with an old HDD. Replaced the HDD with an SSD. Replaced the SATA cable. Updated the BIOS. The only things I haven't changed are the RAM and MOBO. I just ordered new RAM from the official compatibility list and will install that when it arrives in a few days. When it does arrive, I'm going to try to find a different install disc, hopefully one that includes some service packs so I don't have to update everything all over again. Hm...just noticed I did replace a video card during all of this, but don't recall if any of these other issues happened before then or not. Any thoughts on that? |
|
![]() |
|
wardog ![]() Moderator Group ![]() Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Disk read errors, to me anyways, tells me there's something fishy with the current OS install, the drive or that drives power and or data cables.
A write error means something altogether different IMHO. That's I'd be looking at the processor or chipset. Have you scanned the drive with the manufacturers test utility? IIRC I've read that the Anniversary upgrade of 10 borked some previous OS utils. And thanks parsec for coming in and mentioning the two voltages of the X99 that need tweaked when using 100 chipset XMPs on an X99. BTW, the Cat has exited stage left. Time for the mouse to play. Look at that thread for updates coming soon. SuperPi at 5.1 but I had to stabilize the IMC a pinch to get there with 32GB. I now have my old Sammy Green sticks at hand. Hoping 5.2 and above after lessening the IMC load. |
|
![]() |
|
sadkkf ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 06 Nov 2016 Status: Offline Points: 25 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Right now I can't even boot from the Windows DVD. No matter what option I try (Safe Mode, Last Known Good Configuration...) all of them want to reinstall Windows.
If I choose the option to repair, it tells me the version of the Software Recovery Software is not compatible with the version of Windows installed. It is the same disc I used to install it originally. Does this mean the recovery doesn't recognize the installation after all the patches and service packs? |
|
![]() |
|
sadkkf ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 06 Nov 2016 Status: Offline Points: 25 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Correct. My memory is running at 2133. I will try to get back to Windows to run sfc, but right now, all I get is the disk read error. I don't know the model of the PSU and will need to open the case to see what it is. Would you think replacing the RAM with these: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231798&cm_re=F4-2666C15Q-32GRR-_-20-231-798-_-Product Would help my situation? |
|
![]() |
|
parsec ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 4996 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
According to G.SKILL, your memory model, the F4-3000C14Q-32GTZ, is shown as compatible only with Intel Skylake 100 series chipset boards, only Z170 chipset boards are listed. Click on the QVL tab on this page, and then the little grey triangle next to each mother board manufacture: http://www.gskill.com/en/product/f4-3000c14q-32gtz It's frustrating that with only two platforms (Intel X99 and Intel 100 series chipsets) currently supporting DDR4 memory that compatibility should be a problem. But some of the CPU voltage parameters related to the memory controller (part of the CPU) are different between these two systems. Those are the VCCSA and VCCIO voltages. Usually, Z170 compatible memory needs more VCCSA and VCCIO voltage than X99 compatible memory. You should have VCCSA and VCCIO voltage offset settings in the UEFI/BIOS. You could try using a positive 0.1V additional offset voltage to stabilize your memory. Why it passed memtest fine is curious. If your memory is not over clocked, it should be running at a speed of 2133. Is that what your memory speed is currently? Next, the main problem seems to be the corruption of your OS installation, given the disk read errors you continue to have. Another fix for a corrupted Windows installation is to run the sfc command. Start a Command Prompt (Admin) window, and type in sfc /scannow That will take a while to run, just let it go and it will tell you what the results are. It is possible it may find errors that it is unable to fix. You mentioned your 850W PSU, but did not specify the model. |
|
![]() |
|
sadkkf ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 06 Nov 2016 Status: Offline Points: 25 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One other question...Looking at the memory support list:
http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/X99%20Extreme4/index.asp?cat=Memory Is it a safe bet to try one of the 3000's from that list or should I try something slower to be sure? I think changing the RAM at this point is all I can do. Everything else has been changed. If the new RAM doesn't work, it must be the board, right? |
|
![]() |
|
sadkkf ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 06 Nov 2016 Status: Offline Points: 25 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My specs again: X99 Extreme4 BIOS v3.40 Samsung 850 EVO SSD (boot drive) Windows 7 Pro G.SKILL TridentZ 288-pin SDRAM DDR4 3000 Model F4-3000C14Q-32GTZ (4x8GB) MSI Radeon R9 390 Gaming 8GB PCI Express 3 Intel i7-5820K NOTHING is OC'd. I've *never* OC'd anything with this build. The disk read error is somewhat intermittent. Yesterday, for example, Windows gave some errors, blue screened, reboot and gave the error. I ran MemTest86 and found nothing. Reboot it manually, then Windows automatically ran ChkDsk and that found a lot of errors and booted fine right after. I was rendering a 3D scene for work, went to bed, and over night the PC crashed and rebooted again. Right now I'm seeing the disk read error again. The error is intermittent, but getting more frequent. I bought the parts for this late August last year and probably didn't see the first problem for a few months. Now, the PC is unusable. I've checked the power consumption and it's never gone over 300 watts with an 850W power supply. CPU and case temps are well below limits, too. All I can think of is RAM unless there's something not right about this board. |
|
![]() |
|
wardog ![]() Moderator Group ![]() Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Those F4-3000C14Q-32GTZ sticks, they do not have any X99 XMP Profiles, only Z170 ones. That means you need to set them up manually on the X99. Doesn't mean they will or won't work, even at a lower initial boot. Only that setting XMP doesn't work on the X99. Too, you'll most likely have to adjust other voltages seeings they don't have proper X99 XMP settings. Odd. I just cut and pasted the link I posted and it's working fine here. Oh. It runs for a month or so huh? Hmmmmm .... I was going off this was a new build giving you fits. Is the board/processor OC'd while this happens? Specs please. Of your system and generalize the OC if any. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |