x570 Taichi + 9800x |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Ray62
Groupie Joined: 01 Jul 2018 Location: Germany, Berlin Status: Offline Points: 706 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 22 Oct 2019 at 6:18am |
I think so too, it works like "intended".
With 3533Mhz CL14-14-14-14 you even maybe found a sweet spot for your combo. And you have a board with T topology for the RAM layout, a good base for 4 sticks (regardless to what the QVL says). My G.SKILL F4-3200C14D-32GTZ reached 3466MHz also with a CL14 timing and 1.4V. That was not possible on my old X370 combo. |
|
Asrock Fatal1ty X370 Professional Gaming Offline
Under test: MSI X570_MEG_ACE | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | Scythe Mugen5 | 2x16GB F4-3200C14D-32GTZ@3466 | ASUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE |
|
Amorphis
Newbie Joined: 21 Oct 2019 Location: Tg Mures Status: Offline Points: 20 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the reply and the provided links.
The PC works perfectly now, as I said , with 3533Mhz CL-14-14-14 calculated with Ryzen Dram Calculator. I know the QVL lists 2 DIMMs, but as I said in the post, I tryed using only 2 DIMMs and still had the same issue. So after reading your post, I can safely assume that everything works as "intended". |
|
Ray62
Groupie Joined: 01 Jul 2018 Location: Germany, Berlin Status: Offline Points: 706 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You are looking to the QVL and obviously you are only seeing what you want...
F4-3600C16D-16GTZR is listed for two sticks. But you are using four! Question 1: Is it normal that you have to bump the voltages, while using XMP so that the system can be stable ? Welcome in the real world! But you can be happy, you just had to increase the voltage! And one time again: You are using four sticks. Question 2: May it be possible that the mobo or ram be broken ? (ram tests reports 0 erros). No, i don't think so. Your system is running or not? Question 3: After I did some tests/benchmarks, ended up using 3533Mhz CL14-14-14-14. This is far more stable and performant. Is this normal too ? With lower latencies it is mostly faster compared to a bit higher frequency but with required increased latencies. Proposal: Goto this x570 Taichi thread, a better place for OC: https://www.overclock.net/forum/11-amd-motherboards/1730162-official-asrock-x570-overclocking-support-thread.html And check out the Ryzen DRAM calculator with it's howtos and articles. |
|
Asrock Fatal1ty X370 Professional Gaming Offline
Under test: MSI X570_MEG_ACE | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | Scythe Mugen5 | 2x16GB F4-3200C14D-32GTZ@3466 | ASUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE |
|
Amorphis
Newbie Joined: 21 Oct 2019 Location: Tg Mures Status: Offline Points: 20 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Oops, misspelled 9800x - meant 3900x :(
|
|
Amorphis
Newbie Joined: 21 Oct 2019 Location: Tg Mures Status: Offline Points: 20 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Helloes,
Got some issues/questions regarding x570 Taichi ram compatibility. First of all, this is my build : MOBO : Asrock x570 Taichi Proc : AMD 3900x RAM : 2x G.SKILL F4-3600C16D-16GTZR (2x 16GB kits - 4x 8GB DIMMs) GPU : Sapphire Radeon RX 5700 XT NITRO+ SSD : Corsair Force MP600 500GB PCI Express 4.0x4 M.2 2280 HDDs : 2x Seagate Barracuda 7200 RPM So the kits I bought (F4-3600C16D-16GTZR), are mentioned in Taichi QVL list, therefore I was expecting everything to work out fine with just activating the XMP profiles. If I activate the XMP profile (3600Mhz, CL16-16-16-16) the system boots but is instable under load ! During Cinebench R20, the system just restarts. I found that wierd, so I tried the same test with only 2 DIMMs for each channel. Same thing happened. After that, I used all 4 DIMMs again, but had to bump the DRAM voltage to 1.45v to make the system stable. With 1.45v DDR, 1.1v SOC, the system is stable and everything works fine. I was under the belief that the rated XMP profile should be stable with the specified 1.35v DDR voltage... Question 1 : Is it normal that you have to bump the voltages, while using XMP so that the system can be stable ? Question 2 : May it be possible that the mobo or ram be broken ? (ram tests reports 0 erros). Question 3 : After I did some tests/benchmarks, ended up using 3533Mhz CL14-14-14-14. This is far more stable and performant. Is this normal too ? Thanks |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |