![]() |
(AM1H-ITX) Slow boot with SSD |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
Xaltar ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 23963 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 20 Jun 2015 at 5:23pm |
If I think of anything useful I will post it up for you
![]() Enjoy your NES station
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
jamaster14 ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 20 Jun 2015 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yeah startup menu didnt help. but maybe there is antoher way, ill have to keep playing around with it.
i think ill just run the magician thing and then just live with the 40 seconds or so. if anyone else has any ideas on how to speed it up, im all ears. i could go windows 8, but the front end and emulation im running likes windows 7 better and that part takes precedence over boot time. |
|
![]() |
|
Xaltar ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 23963 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That looks fantastic, great job
![]() As for the startup problem I am at a loss, you have already done what I would have suggested. I don't suppose you have tried the idiot option of adding the emu to the startup menu? As for boot speed, if you can get your hands on Windows 8.1 and give that a try it should cut down boot times. Instant boot seems to have an aversion to running startup apps.... Edited by Xaltar - 20 Jun 2015 at 4:44pm |
|
![]() |
|
jamaster14 ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 20 Jun 2015 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah the build came out great... after modifying the case everything fit perfect and with a coat of new paint it looks like it rolled right out of the factory:
here are the photos of the project start to finish if you are interested: https://s89.photobucket.com/user/jamaster14/library/NESPC%20Project?sort=3&page=1 And here are a couple of the finished product ![]() ![]() I'll try that magician software, thanks for the link. As far as startup, i tried a couple methods: 1) added a key under ...\currentversion\run in the registry to get the context menu item in msconfig. then checked it off. it runs at startup with isntant boot disabled, but not instant boot 2) I shelled windows, and had the system boot to hyperspin.exe (my emulation front end) instead of explorer.exe. which works great booting normally, but when trying to run on instant boot, it never takes... instant boot will shut down, reboot, but then never shutdown the second time. i guess it needs explorer to be able to run tis course? Ideally, since its an NES PC id like it to boot into the front end as quick as possible. if i can get the boot time in the 20 second range that would be great. i can changed the windows splash screens and logon screens to nintendo stuff but 45 seconds still kind of kills the effect. If i can get instant boot to work, where it will power on and immedietly start up hyperspin, that would be the best case. thanks for the responses,if you have any other ideas on the best route to do this id love to hear it
Edited by jamaster14 - 20 Jun 2015 at 4:32pm |
|
![]() |
|
Xaltar ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 23963 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Perfect choice for a NESPC
![]() Here is the download page for your drive, download and install the latest "Magician Software" and keep the page bookmarked incase you experience performance degradation, in which case update to the latest firmware. I wouldn't update unless you have performance problems. Although looking at the firmware it does appear to improve performance with Magician so I guess its up to you if you want to try out the latest firmware. How are you setting your startup apps with instant boot? (edit) OK so I just timed my boot from power on to desktop I clock in at 18 seconds in windows 8.1 which is known to boot faster than win7.
Edited by Xaltar - 20 Jun 2015 at 4:17pm |
|
![]() |
|
jamaster14 ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 20 Jun 2015 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks, it came with a CD, maybe that utility is on there.
is the driver im using ok? ive seen other screens shots of evos using a different one then mine has listed? Im tempted to use the asrock instant boot utility. it works well, but it has some issues with running software on startup, this build is for an NESPC, so ideally it would boot right into the emulator, which it doesnt seem to do even though without instant boot i can get it to run on startup. |
|
![]() |
|
Xaltar ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 23963 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Those scores look fine for a raw drive bench. If memory serves Samsung Evo drives support RAPID mode that drastically improves performance in certain workloads. I am not certain if your drive supports it but its definitely worth checking out.
I ran a quick comparison bench on my optima 240 for you: ![]() Your drive is higher end than mine so performs a little better where it counts ![]() From your results you are right where you should be with an Evo, not at the top of the charts for that model but not under-performing at all either. In other words the drive is performing as it should so any additional boot time is coming from the rest of the system. Rapid (if applicable to your drive) will not help boot times by much, if any, but will help in certain workloads to provide a snappier response time on your SSD. If your drive supports it and you install it, run the benchmark again and take a look at the difference ![]() [edit] I confused Readyboost (windows) with Rapid (samsung) sorry about that lol. All fixed.
Edited by Xaltar - 20 Jun 2015 at 3:53pm |
|
![]() |
|
jamaster14 ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 20 Jun 2015 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
jamaster14 ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 20 Jun 2015 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you for the reply!
The post doesnt take very long. maybe 4 or 5 seconds between the 2 screens. most of it is the windows splash screen and the windows welcome/logon screen. I will run the bench marks using that utility and post up the results. I do realize the trade off of low power/quiet build vs. performance, but this unusually long. i was hoping for something more in the 15-25 second range. its not the end of the world if the boot time is what it is, but id think it should be a bit faster. anyhow, thanks for the input, ill post the screens up in a bit.
|
|
![]() |
|
Xaltar ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 23963 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Welcome to the forums
![]() How much of that 35-45 seconds is taken up by the Post process? I am assuming not much given you are concerned that boot times are too slow for a system booting from SSD. To test the performance of you SSDs you could use AS SSD Benchmark and post up a screenshot of the results. The Athlon 5350 is an awesome little low power CPU, I was sorely tempted to build an ITX system around one myself when they came out. What you do have to bare in mind though is that they are a low power solution and not designed for performance. My system with a Pentium G3258, 8gb (2x4gb) DDR3 1600 (@1400mhz) with a PNY optima 240gb SSD boots in about 20 - 30 seconds using fast boot so your numbers don't seem all that bad from where I sit. Bare in mind that post times can vary widely from one motherboard platform to the next depending on such things as chipset, number of features that need to be initialized at post etc. While 45 seconds is a little on the high side for an SSD based system it means very little if say 15 seconds of that is taken up by post.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |