SM951 as OS boot device information |
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 20> |
Author | |
ReRoR
Newbie Joined: 17 Aug 2016 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hey parsec,
Although some sites include RAPID mode in their results, and it may be considered cheating the benchmarks, if they specified the hardware platform, and that RAM caching is enabled, it may have some actual purpose for users, and could also be a real way to fetch some awesome performance gains for gaming and applications, with much lower outlay on technology. Would you mind kindly sharing a few of those links for me to have a look at closer? Thanks! I am particularly looking to exploit this using an outdated X99 chipset for a build, and it's quad channel memory, as you can see why;
There are also 3rd party applications that perform similarly to Samsung's RAPID, that may be introducing the ability to define what specific information is cached, as opposed to a straight bit level cache everything, which would further add merit and purpose to the use of RAM caching. |
|
andressergio
Newbie Joined: 29 Apr 2016 Location: Uruguay Status: Offline Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
here's my Samsung 950 PRO M.2 NVMe
|
|
andressergio
Newbie Joined: 29 Apr 2016 Location: Uruguay Status: Offline Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
jesus that is superfast !!!
|
|
parsec
Moderator Group Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 4996 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
No, and it's very simple why that is. Benchmark tests first write data to the device being tested, and measure that speed while it is being written. Then they read back the data it just wrote to measure the read speed. That cycle repeats depending upon the type of test being done. Such as, large file (128K+) sequential, or small file (4K) "random", meaning small files in different locations on the drive, or "Q32" tests, meaning 32 IO requests in a line, sent to the drive one after the other, instead of just one IO request. Your 840 EVO is in RAPID mode, which uses your PC's memory as a RAM cache for the SSD. If you checked the amount of memory being used by your PC about one minute after it boots, you would find at least 2GB being used by the RAPID cache. That memory now receives ALL data that is "written to" the Samsung SSD first, which is then later written to the SSD itself. The data written to the RAPID cache stays there until enough new data is written to the Samsung RAPID cache to fill up the RAPID RAM cache, and the older data is written over by the new data. That is, unless the older data has not yet completely been actually written to the Samsung SSD, at its actual write speed capability. When the benchmark runs on a Samsung SSD in RAPID mode, all its test data is written to and read from the RAPID RAM cache. So in reality you've just ran a benchmark on your PC's memory, not the 840 EVO at all. If you used some RAM disk software to create a RAM drive, and ran a benchmark test on it, you would get the same kind of results. In reality, your 840 EVO cannot write a large file at over 5,000MB/s. It can write at ~500MB/s, which is what happens when the RAPID RAM cache actually copies the data to the 840 EVO. All benchmark tests run on a Samsung SSD that is using RAPID are not testing the SSD itself, but just the RAM cache created by RAPID. So your PC's DDR3 or DDR4 memory is faster than two PCIe SSDs in RAID 0, which is not a surprise. Turn off RAPID mode on your 840 EVO, and run the benchmark again to see the actual speed of that SSD. You can't use RAPID with SSDs in RAID arrays. But if you could, you would again be just seeing the speed of your PC's memory and not the RAID 0 array itself. I know of at least one website that compiles benchmark test scores, that includes RAPID RAM cache results as if they were the true speed of an SSD! Truly embarrassing! |
|
Endlesspath
Newbie Joined: 17 May 2015 Location: Kentucky US Status: Offline Points: 5 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
TheSSDREVIEW has a detailed review (BIOS settings/Test results) of the Z170 Extreme7+ with 3x Samsung SM950 pros raided as a boot drive; you should review it here (bios settings on pg 2): http://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/understanding-m2-3xraid0-nvme-boot-performance/ |
|
TimH
Newbie Joined: 12 Sep 2015 Location: Florida Status: Offline Points: 64 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Anyone got different results? Or a similar setup to check against?
|
|
TimH
Newbie Joined: 12 Sep 2015 Location: Florida Status: Offline Points: 64 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Here are two Crystal Mark Runs in Win7 64x, first is a SSD Boot Samsung 840 250ish meg holding the OS.
The second is two Samsung 951 256mb M2 cards RAID 0. Empty Not sure why the SSD is kicking the RAID 0's numbers so badly. Shouldn't it be the other way around?
Edited by TimH - 01 Dec 2015 at 1:53am |
|
fdisker
Newbie Joined: 01 Sep 2015 Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Curiosity got the best of me. Microcenter had them in stock today so I grabbed the 250 gig version. I started another thread and posted some quick benchmarks if you're curious.
|
|
fdisker
Newbie Joined: 01 Sep 2015 Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I decided to play a little more. Just for fun I decided to wipe the drive and reinstall Windows 10 in UEFI mode. I also upgraded the RAM using a Corsair Vengeance Pro 2400Mhz 16GB kit. I figured if I was going to be using my DRAM as a cache then I may as well make the cache as fast as possible ;)
What surprised me the most was the reduction in boot time. Turning off CSM in the BIOS and enabling fast boot made a huge difference. From fully powered off to the Win10 login screen takes 5 seconds. FIVE SECONDS!! Just wow. I should also mention the quick boot time required a generic wired usb keyboard and mouse. Using a microsoft wireless mouse and keyboard lengthened the boot time to about 10 seconds. And if you're curious I'm using integrated Intel graphics so I don't have much hardware to initialize. I continue to be impressed with the 850 EVO. I'm starting to doubt whether I need (or even want) the 950 Pro.
Edited by fdisker - 02 Nov 2015 at 3:58am |
|
parsec
Moderator Group Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 4996 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Newegg has 11/1/15 as the availability date for the Samsung 950. Usually Microcenter is slower to stock new products than Newegg, hopefully this time that won't happen. My local Microcenter is my second home...
RAPID is no big deal IMO. It is a Windows process with a delayed startup, so not running when the PC boots. Benchmarks with RAPID are simply that of your memory, since it is a DRAM cache as you know. The other reality about RAPID is while benchmarks show super fast write speeds, that is the DRAM cache. Any saved data must still be written to the SSD, which is done at the speed of the SSD of course. Nothing can change that. The 850 EVO is the fastest SATA SSD in 4K/small file read speed performance, which makes it great for loading an OS. PCIe SSDs have better 4K performance, but there seems to be a limit to loading Windows, no less than three seconds from POST beep to desktop. Even my PCIe SSDs can't seem to reduce that time. For many things, you won't see any difference with a PCIe SSD. But some things are faster. For example, doing backups or cloning to and from a PCIe SSD is truly faster. |
|
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 20> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |