ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical Support > Intel Motherboards
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - SM951 as OS boot device information
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

SM951 as OS boot device information

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 20>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
ReRoR View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2016
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ReRoR Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Aug 2016 at 11:28pm
Hey parsec,

Although some sites include RAPID mode in their results, and it may be considered cheating the benchmarks, if they specified the hardware platform, and that RAM caching is enabled, it may have some actual purpose for users, and could also be a real way to fetch some awesome performance gains for gaming and applications, with much lower outlay on technology.

Would you mind kindly sharing a few of those links for me to have a look at closer? Thanks!

I am particularly looking to exploit this using an outdated X99 chipset for a build, and it's quad channel memory, as you can see why;
  • Z170 - Bus speed: 8 GT/s DMI3 | Dual Channel DDR4 memory (Max theoretical bandwidth of 34.1 GB/s limited by CPU)
  • X99 Bus speed: 5 GT/s DMI2 | Quad channel DDR4 memory (Max theoretical bandwidth of 68 GB/s limited by CPU)
There are also 3rd party applications that perform similarly to Samsung's RAPID, that may be introducing the ability to define what specific information is cached, as opposed to a straight bit level cache everything, which would further add merit and purpose to the use of RAM caching.
Back to Top
andressergio View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 29 Apr 2016
Location: Uruguay
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote andressergio Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 2016 at 3:08am
here's my Samsung 950 PRO M.2 NVMe


Back to Top
andressergio View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 29 Apr 2016
Location: Uruguay
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote andressergio Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 2016 at 3:06am
Originally posted by TimH TimH wrote:

Here are two Crystal Mark Runs in Win7 64x, first is a SSD Boot Samsung 840 250ish meg holding the OS.

The second is two Samsung 951 256mb M2 cards RAID 0. Empty



Not sure why the SSD is kicking the RAID 0's numbers so badly. Shouldn't it be the other way around?

jesus that is superfast !!!
Back to Top
parsec View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4996
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote parsec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Jan 2016 at 12:53pm
Originally posted by TimH TimH wrote:

Here are two Crystal Mark Runs in Win7 64x, first is a SSD Boot Samsung 840 250ish meg holding the OS.

The second is two Samsung 951 256mb M2 cards RAID 0. Empty



Not sure why the SSD is kicking the RAID 0's numbers so badly. Shouldn't it be the other way around?


No, and it's very simple why that is.

Benchmark tests first write data to the device being tested, and measure that speed while it is being written. Then they read back the data it just wrote to measure the read speed. That cycle repeats depending upon the type of test being done. Such as, large file (128K+) sequential, or small file (4K) "random", meaning small files in different locations on the drive, or "Q32" tests, meaning 32 IO requests in a line, sent to the drive one after the other, instead of just one IO request.

Your 840 EVO is in RAPID mode, which uses your PC's memory as a RAM cache for the SSD. If you checked the amount of memory being used by your PC about one minute after it boots, you would find at least 2GB being used by the RAPID cache. That memory now receives ALL data that is "written to" the Samsung SSD first, which is then later written to the SSD itself.

The data written to the RAPID cache stays there until enough new data is written to the Samsung RAPID cache to fill up the RAPID RAM cache, and the older data is written over by the new data. That is, unless the older data has not yet completely been actually written to the Samsung SSD, at its actual write speed capability.

When the benchmark runs on a Samsung SSD in RAPID mode, all its test data is written to and read from the RAPID RAM cache. So in reality you've just ran a benchmark on your PC's memory, not the 840 EVO at all. If you used some RAM disk software to create a RAM drive, and ran a benchmark test on it, you would get the same kind of results.

In reality, your 840 EVO cannot write a large file at over 5,000MB/s. It can write at ~500MB/s, which is what happens when the RAPID RAM cache actually copies the data to the 840 EVO.

All benchmark tests run on a Samsung SSD that is using RAPID are not testing the SSD itself, but just the RAM cache created by RAPID.

So your PC's DDR3 or DDR4 memory is faster than two PCIe SSDs in RAID 0, which is not a surprise. Turn off RAPID mode on your 840 EVO, and run the benchmark again to see the actual speed of that SSD.

You can't use RAPID with SSDs in RAID arrays. But if you could, you would again be just seeing the speed of your PC's memory and not the RAID 0 array itself.

I know of at least one website that compiles benchmark test scores, that includes RAPID RAM cache results as if they were the true speed of an SSD! Wacko Thumbs Down  Truly embarrassing!
Back to Top
Endlesspath View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 2015
Location: Kentucky US
Status: Offline
Points: 5
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Endlesspath Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Dec 2015 at 10:17am
Originally posted by Smoothhead61 Smoothhead61 wrote:

Hi to all,
I am a newbie on this forum and this is my first post. I hope I am in the right thread!
I am gathering components for my new build which will include the new z170 extreme 7+ motherboard. I plan on running 2 x Titan X in sli (WC), i7 6700K CPU, + 2 x Samsung SM951 ACHI pci-e 3 x4 SSD drives. First question is, can I run both Titan x's in sli + 1 or 2 x SM951's pci-e on this motherboard? Secondly, can I run the SM951's in raid 0 as my boot drive?
I appreciate any advice given.


TheSSDREVIEW has a detailed review (BIOS settings/Test results) of the Z170 Extreme7+ with 3x Samsung SM950 pros raided as a boot drive; you should review it here (bios settings on pg 2):
http://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/understanding-m2-3xraid0-nvme-boot-performance/
Back to Top
TimH View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Status: Offline
Points: 64
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TimH Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Dec 2015 at 7:29am
Anyone got different results? Or a similar setup to check against?

Back to Top
TimH View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Status: Offline
Points: 64
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TimH Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Dec 2015 at 1:48am
Here are two Crystal Mark Runs in Win7 64x, first is a SSD Boot Samsung 840 250ish meg holding the OS.

The second is two Samsung 951 256mb M2 cards RAID 0. Empty



Not sure why the SSD is kicking the RAID 0's numbers so badly. Shouldn't it be the other way around?


Edited by TimH - 01 Dec 2015 at 1:53am
Back to Top
fdisker View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 01 Sep 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fdisker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Nov 2015 at 3:39am
Curiosity got the best of me.  Microcenter had them in stock today so I grabbed the 250 gig version.  I started another thread and posted some quick benchmarks if you're curious.
Back to Top
fdisker View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 01 Sep 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fdisker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 2015 at 8:39pm
I decided to play a little more.  Just for fun I decided to wipe the drive and reinstall Windows 10 in UEFI mode.  I also upgraded the RAM using a Corsair Vengeance Pro 2400Mhz 16GB kit.  I figured if I was going to be using my DRAM as a cache then I may as well make the cache as fast as possible ;)

What surprised me the most was the reduction in boot time.  Turning off CSM in the BIOS and enabling fast boot made a huge difference.  From fully powered off to the Win10 login screen takes 5 seconds.  FIVE SECONDS!!  Just wow.  I should also mention the quick boot time required a generic wired usb keyboard and mouse.  Using a microsoft wireless mouse and keyboard lengthened the boot time to about 10 seconds.  And if you're curious I'm using integrated Intel graphics so I don't have much hardware to initialize.  

I continue to be impressed with the 850 EVO.  I'm starting to doubt whether I need (or even want) the 950 Pro.


Edited by fdisker - 02 Nov 2015 at 3:58am
Back to Top
parsec View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4996
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote parsec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Oct 2015 at 12:58am
Newegg has 11/1/15 as the availability date for the Samsung 950. Usually Microcenter is slower to stock new products than Newegg, hopefully this time that won't happen. My local Microcenter is my second home... Wink

RAPID is no big deal IMO. It is a Windows process with a delayed startup, so not running when the PC boots. Benchmarks with RAPID are simply that of your memory, since it is a DRAM cache as you know.

The other reality about RAPID is while benchmarks show super fast write speeds, that is the DRAM cache. Any saved data must still be written to the SSD, which is done at the speed of the SSD of course. Nothing can change that.

The 850 EVO is the fastest SATA SSD in 4K/small file read speed performance, which makes it great for loading an OS. PCIe SSDs have better 4K performance, but there seems to be a limit to loading Windows, no less than three seconds from POST beep to desktop. Even my PCIe SSDs can't seem to reduce that time.

For many things, you won't see any difference with a PCIe SSD. But some things are faster. For example, doing backups or cloning to and from a PCIe SSD is truly faster.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 20>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.