ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical Support > AMD Motherboards
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - new beta bios for X399 is up on ASRock site
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

new beta bios for X399 is up on ASRock site

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1617181920 25>
Author
Message
lowdog View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 16 Apr 2017
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 194
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote lowdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Aug 2018 at 4:53am
Why the hell don't Asrock inform users why the bios was taken down because I would say there are quite a few people using it currently so what is the problem? Should we still be using it? will it cause our hardware to explode???

Or is it just this Linux problem??
X399 Fat Pro Gaming bios 3.10 - TR4 1900X - 64GB G-SKILL TridentZ F4-3200C14Q-64GTZ @ 3133MHz - Vega 64 AIO with EK block - WC Custom loop - 1500W Silverstone PSU - yay
Back to Top
SoniC View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 23 May 2017
Status: Offline
Points: 183
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SoniC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Aug 2018 at 12:19pm
Originally posted by lowdog lowdog wrote:

Originally posted by apatch apatch wrote:

[URL=][/URL]
3.1 was taken down again, coincidence ?

I am struggling with terrible throttling but it started already with 2.0 bios, really hot summer and some new chrome features making tabs opening really slow. So I hit 68C pretty fast, previously was able to use lowest fan speed on Enermax 360, now it can't even handle cooling with fans on max, throttling even to 500Mhz and sometimes shuting down the system, anyone can share his fan setting for enermax ?

Mine was :
CPU Fan 1 Temp Source :? Monitor CPU (but switched to Tctl when temps where high)
Temp 1:        58
Fan Duty %    8
Temp 2:       65
Fan Duty % 32
Temp 3:      73
Fan Duty % 50
Temp 4:       79
Fan Duty % 70
Critical       ? 80



It's your Enermax 360, there are reports all over the web regarding this unit, apparently over time the block gets gunked up due to the coolant they use in the loop and it's cooling capabilities become compromised.....RMA that thing or get rid of it and do a custom loop with just distilled water.

You can also disassemblee the unit and exchange the coolant for a better (and uncorrosive) one.
See the YT videos on Gamers Nexus.
-=SoniC=-
TR x1950, ASRock X399 FPG (v. 3.33A), G.Skill 3200 CL14 64GB, Enermax LiqTech 280,
AMD Vega 64 LC, 10x HDDs (mostly Hitachi), 2x M.2 (970EVO,960Pro), Xonar DX, AX1200i PSU
Back to Top
antorsae View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 16 Dec 2017
Status: Offline
Points: 36
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote antorsae Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Aug 2018 at 12:56pm
3.20 is up!
Back to Top
TANWare View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 24 Sep 2017
Status: Offline
Points: 120
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TANWare Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Aug 2018 at 8:09pm
3.20 seems stable here, again I have had no issues since 3.00. Again 3466 memory is stable too.
 
Edit; please tell Asrock to stop it, I a running out of space on my Bios USB stick. :)


Edited by TANWare - 02 Aug 2018 at 8:11pm
x399 Taichi, 1950x, 32GB 3466 DDR4
2x500GB 960EVO,Asus 1080TI
Passmark
Back to Top
awaybreaktoday View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 02 Aug 2018
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote awaybreaktoday Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Aug 2018 at 9:17pm
With bios 3.10 and 3.20 I am unable to use SATA and NVME raid together.....
Back to Top
ajc9988 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 25 Jun 2018
Status: Offline
Points: 32
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ajc9988 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Aug 2018 at 4:09am
3.20 is no good. At 3466, I am seeing the same score in CB15 as if running stock 2133. I saw this in the last one as well, where 3466 would have my score in CB15 around 3515, still down from my regular, but fine. But, even though I didn't get 3600 or 3733 stable, AIDA64 reads the bandwidth going up, but 3600 or 3733, even expecting error so erroneous scores, it goes right back to stock scores of around 3300 (Core at 4050).

I did 3466, which seemed stable, no errors in any cursory testing with HCI or with TM5, and the CB15 score was the same as stock, even though AIDA64 read bandwidth of 100 or 101GBps. So something is NOT right with this one. So I'm not sure what they did, but things changed. I also saw that when I go to manual for the SOC, it is at level 1 now. I move it to level 2, but that was a change I noticed. I also have to go up one more tick on the core voltage even using level 2 to get my 4050 OC stable.

But, cursory looks at the BIOS.

Edit: So, after talking to another user, I'll need to test a couple things to confirm what is going on, because he did not see the same behavior.


Edited by ajc9988 - 03 Aug 2018 at 5:01am
// 1950X @ 4.05GHz @ 1.2875V // Asrock X399 Taichi // G.Skill 4133 Trident Z @ 3600 CL14 17 17 17 34 48 4x8GB //
// EVGA 980 Ti Classy // Custom Liquid Cooling Loop //
Back to Top
lowdog View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 16 Apr 2017
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 194
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote lowdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Aug 2018 at 7:22am
Wow the upgrade from 3.10 to 3.20 is the first and only time my saved profiles were still there after the flash.
X399 Fat Pro Gaming bios 3.10 - TR4 1900X - 64GB G-SKILL TridentZ F4-3200C14Q-64GTZ @ 3133MHz - Vega 64 AIO with EK block - WC Custom loop - 1500W Silverstone PSU - yay
Back to Top
ajc9988 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 25 Jun 2018
Status: Offline
Points: 32
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ajc9988 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Aug 2018 at 7:24am
Originally posted by lowdog lowdog wrote:

Wow the upgrade from 3.10 to 3.20 is the first and only time my saved profiles were still there after the flash.

It started at 3.0 and I really like that the profiles stay saved after the flash.
// 1950X @ 4.05GHz @ 1.2875V // Asrock X399 Taichi // G.Skill 4133 Trident Z @ 3600 CL14 17 17 17 34 48 4x8GB //
// EVGA 980 Ti Classy // Custom Liquid Cooling Loop //
Back to Top
wardog View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group


Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6447
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wardog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Aug 2018 at 12:06pm
Originally posted by ajc9988 ajc9988 wrote:

3.20 is no good. At 3466, I am seeing the same score in CB15 as if running stock 2133. I saw this in the last one as well, where 3466 would have my score in CB15 around 3515, still down from my regular, but fine. But, even though I didn't get 3600 or 3733 stable, AIDA64 reads the bandwidth going up, but 3600 or 3733, even expecting error so erroneous scores, it goes right back to stock scores of around 3300 (Core at 4050).

I did 3466, which seemed stable, no errors in any cursory testing with HCI or with TM5, and the CB15 score was the same as stock, even though AIDA64 read bandwidth of 100 or 101GBps. So something is NOT right with this one. So I'm not sure what they did, but things changed. I also saw that when I go to manual for the SOC, it is at level 1 now. I move it to level 2, but that was a change I noticed. I also have to go up one more tick on the core voltage even using level 2 to get my 4050 OC stable.

But, cursory looks at the BIOS.

Edit: So, after talking to another user, I'll need to test a couple things to confirm what is going on, because he did not see the same behavior.


But what timings?

.
Back to Top
TANWare View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 24 Sep 2017
Status: Offline
Points: 120
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TANWare Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Aug 2018 at 1:30pm
I tried 3600 on the XMP. It was rock solid at 1.375v with error's below. At 3466 I had TFaw from the 39 default tightened too 31. @3600 I could not tighten it even at 1.385v. I get as good results @3466 with tightened TFaw so I went back.
x399 Taichi, 1950x, 32GB 3466 DDR4
2x500GB 960EVO,Asus 1080TI
Passmark
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1617181920 25>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.