ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical Support > Intel Motherboards
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Boot X99 Extreme11 - Samsung 950 PCIe/NVMe in RAID
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

Boot X99 Extreme11 - Samsung 950 PCIe/NVMe in RAID

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
msvuze View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 20 Nov 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 12
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote msvuze Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Boot X99 Extreme11 - Samsung 950 PCIe/NVMe in RAID
    Posted: 24 Nov 2015 at 2:27am
Hi,

I would like to know is the X99 Extreme11 motherboard able to the Boot Samsung 950 PRO 512GB PCIe/NVMe 3.0 M.2 in RAID ? 

and if so are the settings for it almost the same as for the Z170 Extreme7+ ? 

I seen a video on how to setup it up for the Z170 Extreme7+ but can't find one for the x99 Extreme11

Thanks


Edited by msvuze - 24 Nov 2015 at 4:39am
Back to Top
stivi View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 28 Nov 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stivi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Nov 2015 at 12:08am
Hi, 

I have the same question. Can someone help us?

Thank you
Back to Top
gpozzet View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jan 2016
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gpozzet Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Jan 2016 at 4:00am
Hello everyone,
First of all sorry for my english...
The answer for your question, IMHO, can be found on the X99 Extreme11 RAID guide, which clearly states the following:
"Intel Rapid Storage Technology for PCIe Storage Use cases
Prerequisite
:
* The PCIe Storage device must be attached to remapable PCIe slot or
PCIe M.2 connector.
* The PCIe Storage device must be AHCI-controller based. ..."
The Samsung 950 PRO products are based on Samsung's NVME proprietary controller, not an AHCI one. They are not seen, at least in my experience, under the Intel RST panel for RAID configuration.

Hope this will help.
Giacomo Pozzetti
Back to Top
parsec View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4996
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote parsec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Jan 2016 at 2:14pm
The configuration settings for an X99 board would be identical to those for a Z170 board in the UEFI, for a RAID 0 array for PCIe SSDs.

The 1.20 UEFI has NVMe support added, so the warning in the RAID guide that only AHCI PCIe SSDs may be used in RAID may no longer be true. But there is more to it than that.

You will need to use the Intel IRST 14.5 or 14.6 driver, and the IRST Option ROM that is part of the UEFI will also need to be at least a 14.5 version.

If you have the Windows IRST 14.5 driver package installed, click on the Help link, and in the new Window click the System Report button. That will show the Option ROM version in your UEFI.

I can tell you from personal experience and that of others, that it is not worth using RAID 0 with PCIe SSDs, at least with the current Intel drivers. The increase in performance is not large, and the usual reduction of performance in RAID 0 with small files (4K) is seen with these SSDs, and becomes lower than using a single 950 Pro. For use as an OS drive, RAID 0 will perform slower in booting than a single 950 Pro.
Back to Top
broken_pixel View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2016
Location: Nebulas
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote broken_pixel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Mar 2016 at 9:06am
Asrock support told me that the extreme11 does not support M.2 RAID 0 only the z170 boards with M.2 slots. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 1.203 seconds.