ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical Support > AMD Motherboards
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - RAID 0 NVME Read Performance Same as Non-RAID
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

RAID 0 NVME Read Performance Same as Non-RAID

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
M440 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 Jul 2023
Status: Offline
Points: 4445
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote M440 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Apr 2025 at 2:25pm
Originally posted by Caxton Caxton wrote:

Thank you all for helping debug this issue.

It appears the initial suggestion was AI-generated, based on the style and format in the original post that referenced "Can I use a Fedora Live CD to mount...". While it was helpful to some extent, the proposed solution ultimately did not work as expected due to several limitations. Fedora LiveCD/USB environments come in various versions, and commands can behave differently depending on the specific combination of version and environment used.

For example, the following command failed when executed in the Fedora 42 Live environment (booted via USB media):

sudo dnf install dmraid

The failure message was:
"failed to resolve the transaction" and "no match for argument dmraind:"

To provide additional context: Fedora 42's Live CD/USB environment does not include `dmraid` by default, nor does it allow installation via the above command. A subsequent search within the booted environment, executed as follows:

sudo dnf search dmraid
...returned:
"no matches found."

The search was performed after the install command failed, simply to confirm whether the `dmraid` package might already exist in the environment?�but it does not.

So, since this approach appears to be a dead end (at least thus far), are there any alternative methods to non-destructively test RAID 0 read performance?

For reference, when testing in the native environment (Windows 11), the issues are consistently related to read commands, irrespective of hardware connection configurations. However, write commands only produce at RAID 0 performance thresholds when one SSD is connected directly to the CPU bus and the other is on the chipset bus. These findings have been consistent across all tested configurations.


im really am sorry, i literally asked the chatbot that in next prompts and it assured me that fedora should be the most straight forward to do that and wont need internet connection. Personally i just use arch



below are the results i get on a single kc3000,nv2 drives:


> sudo hdparm -Tt /dev/nvme0n1p4

/dev/nvme0n1p4:
Timing cached reads:   57590 MB in 1.99 seconds = 28908.02 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 7560 MB in 3.00 seconds = 2519.50 MB/sec
mm@desktop ~
> sudo hdparm -Tt /dev/nvme1n1p5

/dev/nvme1n1p5:
Timing cached reads:   58770 MB in 1.99 seconds = 29503.06 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 8126 MB in 3.00 seconds = 2708.63 MB/sec


Edited by M440 - 30 Apr 2025 at 2:25pm
asrock b650m-hdv/m.2, ryzen 7700x@85watt, arch/kde
Back to Top
Caxton View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2025
Status: Offline
Points: 110
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Caxton Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 4 hours 4 minutes ago at 3:03am
Thank you for explaining. I feel less neurotic (than normal). The additional context is helpful.

It appears RAID 0 read scaling remains an issue.

ASRock has separately confirmed that RAID 0 read performance on this system board is seemingly impaired, failing to function as expected. Even with two identical Gen 4 NVMe SSDs in a RAID 0 array, read operations exhibit performance equivalent to that of a single drive.

I have yet to find any discussions reporting successful RAID 0 read and write scaling on this platform. Specifically, two Gen 4 NVMe SSDs performing as expected in a typical RAID 0 setup. This includes comparisons with other chipset-based RAID implementations that do not require add-in RAID controllers. If this limitation is inherent to the board, it suggests misleading marketing of its RAID 0 NVMe support. The absence of read scaling effectively negates the core advantage of RAID 0, where performance should scale proportionally with the number of drives (e.g., at two times for two SSDs, three times for three, etc.).
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.