ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical Support > Intel Motherboards
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Samsun 960 on an older fatal1ty x99?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

Samsun 960 on an older fatal1ty x99?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
wardog View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group


Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6447
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wardog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Dec 2016 at 4:47pm
Originally posted by wardog wardog wrote:


An 850 EVO would perform at speed in a standard M.2 slot w/o loss.


Thus they get their lanes from the PCH, as they are shared with the normal SATA ports

Originally posted by wardog wardog wrote:


An 850 Pro would need the Ultra M.2 slot to perform at speed.


The Ultra M.2 gets it's lanes directly from the PCIe bus and as such is much faster. But, again, it does consume resources. 4 PCIe lanes of whatever your CPU is capable of providing
Back to Top
l4nce0 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 25 Nov 2016
Status: Offline
Points: 15
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote l4nce0 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Dec 2016 at 7:19am
Alas I had already tried changing everything to UEFI Only. 

Though I am looking at the specs. The 960 evo is rated at 3.2 GBps. The m.2 normal is rated at 6 Gbps. Notice that little B vs big B. This is a big issue if the 960 runs at 25.6 Gbps (little b) and I can only read it at 6 Gbps. 

Seriously. What is wrong with this board, there is no reason it shouldn't be reading this chip!

Interesting. Though as you say the 850 is not the same, at this is the 960.


Edited by l4nce0 - 25 Dec 2016 at 7:20am
Back to Top
l4nce0 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 25 Nov 2016
Status: Offline
Points: 15
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote l4nce0 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Dec 2016 at 7:41am
Know what. I am not 14 any more. I just do not have the time to tweak settings. I have been at this for 5 or so hours. I think it is clear m.2 is just too immature, and no one should be recommending this chip on unproven boards. To my internet counterparts trying to decide if you should but this or something else. Save your money. I am going back to PC microcenter and getting a 1080 instead.

I will note I say this as a senior engineer that builds 3d printers for fun. This isn't a matter of me not googling and trying 20 different solutions. If I had to guess Samsung lied about it being a PCIe varient of M.2 Or the slot on my board just doesn't work. 

Rant over.. Thanks for the help guys. But this just isn't worth 1, the 500 bucks on a flipping SSD. or 2 my time.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.110 seconds.