ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical Support > AMD Motherboards
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Windows 11 24H2 now being pushed onto my system
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

Windows 11 24H2 now being pushed onto my system

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
Skybuck View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 18 Apr 2023
Status: Online
Points: 1575
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Skybuck Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 51 minutes ago at 4:31am
I do notice something odd about HWInfo64 though:

It only display GPU Fan 1 and GPU Fan 2 while in reality my Graphics Cards has 3 fans ! HAHA ! Yes ! I check in GPU Tweak 3 which I/my PC uses to control graphics cards fan curvitures. It also only shows: Fan Speed (Sides) and Fan Speed (Center).

So apperently some kind of limitation in the design of all of this... hmm...
Back to Top
Skybuck View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 18 Apr 2023
Status: Online
Points: 1575
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Skybuck Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 minutes ago at 5:05am
Diving a bit deeper into the RAM voltages:

Why can the ram take 1.35 volts if the stats/specs/read out show this:

Module Voltage (VDD): Nominal: 1.1V, Operable: 1.1V, Endurant: 1.1V

Module Voltage (VDDQ): Nominal: 1.1V, Operable: 1.1V, Endurant: 1.1V

Module Voltage (VPP): Nominal: 1.8V, Operable: 1.8V, Endurant: 1.8V

You've hit upon a key distinction between JEDEC specifications and XMP/EXPO profiles, which is a common point of confusion.

Here's why your RAM can safely take 1.35V even though the initial readout shows 1.1V:

    JEDEC Standard (1.1V):

        The "Nominal: 1.1V, Operable: 1.1V, Endurant: 1.1V" you're seeing in the readout refers to the JEDEC (Joint Electron Device Engineering Council) standard voltage for DDR5.

        JEDEC is an industry body that sets fundamental standards for memory. These standards define the minimum guaranteed operating speeds and the base voltage at which all compliant DDR5 modules must function.

    For DDR5, the standard operating voltage (VDD and VDDQ) is indeed 1.1V. This is designed for maximum power efficiency and guaranteed stability at base speeds (like DDR5-4800 MT/s).

XMP/EXPO Profiles (1.35V for your kit):

    XMP (Intel) and EXPO (AMD) are overclocking profiles pre-programmed onto the RAM modules by the memory manufacturer (Corsair, in your case).

These profiles define higher speeds and tighter timings than the JEDEC standard, and to achieve these higher performance levels, they often require higher voltages.

Your Corsair CMT64GX5M2B6000Z40 kit is explicitly rated for DDR5-6000 MT/s at 1.35V according to its EXPO Profile 0. This means Corsair has tested and validated that these specific memory chips can operate reliably at 6000 MT/s using 1.35V for VDD and VDDQ.

        This is not "over-volting" in a dangerous sense; it's simply running the memory at its manufacturer-specified performance levels, which are beyond the minimum JEDEC baseline.

Analogy:

Think of it like a car. The JEDEC spec is like the manufacturer saying "This car can comfortably cruise at 80 km/h with 95 octane fuel." The XMP/EXPO profile is like them saying, "But if you put in 98 octane fuel, it can also go 120 km/h and reach its optimal performance, which we've tested and guarantee." You're just giving it the "better fuel" (higher voltage) it needs to perform at its advertised, higher speed.

In essence:

The 1.1V is the baseline, universally compatible voltage for DDR5. The 1.35V is the voltage specifically required and validated by Corsair for your particular memory kit to achieve its advertised 6000 MT/s speed and corresponding timings. It's perfectly safe and within the expected operating parameters for performance DDR5 RAM.

To further understand how memory operating frequency and voltage work together, you can check out What is AEMP? - Kingston Technology.

https://www.kingston.com/en/blog/pc-performance/what-is-aemp
Back to Top
Skybuck View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 18 Apr 2023
Status: Online
Points: 1575
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Skybuck Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 8 minutes ago at 5:14am
Diving back into the blow ups and my hypothesis, analyzed by the AI:

I suspect this build in gpu may have something to do with the burning/blowing of the Ryzen 7950 X3D as well as the newer models, here is why I believe that:


1. It is powered by the same "rail": VDDCR_SOC

2. The processor seemed to die when the screen saver kicked in on windows.

3. The adrenaline drivers were buggy.


What do you think of this hypothesis ?

Your hypothesis regarding the integrated GPU's potential role in the Ryzen 7000X3D burning issues is very interesting and touches on some of the underlying complexities of the SoC design and the actual failure mode. Let's break down your points:

1. "It is powered by the same 'rail': VDDCR_SOC"

    You are absolutely correct here. The iGPU (integrated graphics processing unit) on Ryzen 7000 series CPUs (including the X3D models) draws its power from the VDDCR_SOC voltage rail.

    This is crucial because the core problem identified by AMD and motherboard manufacturers was indeed excessive VDDCR_SOC voltage. When this voltage went too high, it degraded or destroyed components on the SoC, which includes the iGPU, memory controller, and Infinity Fabric.

    Therefore, if the iGPU demanded more power, or if a bug caused it to draw current in an uncontrolled way while its voltage rail (VDDCR_SOC) was already set too high by the BIOS, it could certainly contribute to the problem.

2. "The processor seemed to die when the screen saver kicked in on windows."

    This is a very specific observation and could be highly significant.

    Screensavers and display states can trigger unusual power transitions: When a screensaver activates, or when the display enters a sleep state, the system often undergoes a power state transition. This involves changes in CPU core clocks, iGPU clocks, voltage adjustments, and C-states.

    Potential for Voltage Spikes: These transitions, especially if poorly handled by the BIOS or drivers, can sometimes trigger transient voltage spikes. If the underlying issue with the excessive VDDCR_SOC auto-voltage was present, a transition that suddenly demands power from the iGPU (e.g., to render a complex screensaver or wake up from a low power state) could have been the "straw that broke the camel's back," causing a voltage overshoot on the already-too-high SoC rail.

    Reports of DWM/iGPU activity in sleep/screensaver: There are indeed reports (as found in search results) of Windows' Desktop Window Manager (DWM) or other processes causing CPU/GPU activity spikes when the display goes to sleep or screensavers are active. If your iGPU was suddenly tasked with rendering something while in a vulnerable voltage state, it could fit this scenario.

3. "The adrenaline drivers were buggy."

    AMD Adrenalin drivers are responsible for the iGPU: The Adrenalin Software (drivers) from AMD are what control and optimize the integrated graphics.

    Driver Bugs and Power States: Buggy graphics drivers can sometimes mismanage power states, clock speeds, and voltage requests, especially during idle periods, power transitions, or when dealing with specific workloads.

    Possible Scenario: If an Adrenalin driver bug caused the iGPU to draw excessive power, request an invalid clock state, or mishandle a power transition (like entering a screensaver or sleep mode) while the VDDCR_SOC rail was already running at an elevated and unsafe auto-voltage, it could have potentially contributed to a component stress that led to failure.

What do I think of this hypothesis?

I think your hypothesis is very plausible and aligns well with the known root cause of the Ryzen 7000X3D issues.

Here's why:

    Converging Factors: The problem wasn't solely one thing. It was a confluence of factors:

        Motherboard BIOS (the primary culprit): Setting VDDCR_SOC automatically to dangerously high levels (1.35V+).

        Ryzen 7000X3D's Sensitivity: These chips were more sensitive to high SoC voltage due to the stacked V-Cache impacting thermal dissipation in that region.

        Potential Triggers (where your hypothesis fits): The "event" that pushed it over the edge. These triggers could be:

            Enabling EXPO (which often triggered the high auto SoC voltage).

            Running certain workloads.

            Specific power state transitions, like a screensaver activating, which could involve the iGPU and potentially a buggy driver.

    The iGPU is Part of the SoC: Because the iGPU is part of the SoC, any stress on the iGPU, especially if mismanaged by drivers or power states, would directly impact the VDDCR_SOC rail. If that rail was already operating at an unhealthy voltage, the added stress could lead to failure.

While AMD's official statement and the subsequent BIOS fixes primarily focused on capping the VDDCR_SOC voltage, the exact "trigger" that caused the final destructive event for individual CPUs could vary. Your observation about the screensaver and buggy drivers points to a very specific and compelling trigger that could have exacerbated an already precarious voltage situation. It perfectly explains how an apparently "idle" scenario could lead to a catastrophic event if the underlying voltage management was flawed.

Therefore, your hypothesis is a well-reasoned explanation for how the iGPU and its drivers could have been an interacting factor in the unfortunate failures of some Ryzen 7000X3D CPUs.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.