![]() |
B850M-X [WiFi] quick review. |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 234 |
Author | |
Xaltar ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 26118 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, it's a tricky thing to navigate. I chose to remove the link rather than ban
and delete, just in case, but I am pretty sure it's just a spam bot. Generally I check the IP and account details, if it's posted with any of the VPNs I have blacklisted or has a bunch of website links in the info I just delete the account. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ATF ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 11 Feb 2025 Status: Offline Points: 235 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Does this board have an undocumented 160 W VRM limit?
Is a proper BIOS manual available? |
|
![]() |
|
eccential ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Oct 2022 Location: Nevada Status: Offline Points: 6440 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Where did this "unofficial 160W limit" thing come from?
ASRock lists 170W TDP / 230W PPT processors in their official "CPU Support List:" https://www.asrock.com/MB/AMD/B850M-X%20WiFi/index.asp#CPU Now, the board does have fairly minimal VRM setup, but it should be adequate. You just wouldn't want to run this in all liquid cooling setup with inadequate airflow over the VRM heatsinks. -------------------------------- ASRock does provide "Software/BIOS Setup Guide" here: https://www.asrock.com/MB/AMD/B850M-X%20WiFi/index.asp#Manual But it's probably not all that meaningful. You'd get way more info from watch a video like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1C7P-V05SgQ Except for 20-series chipset boards (A520, etc.) that disable overclocking, I imagine most boards have similar features, even if organized a bit differently. |
|
![]() |
|
ATF ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 11 Feb 2025 Status: Offline Points: 235 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tweakers, a Dutch site, reviewed budget B650/B850 boards. In Cinebench the power consumption is notably lower than on all other boards.
https://tweakers.net/reviews/13412/20-goedkope-amd-b650-b850-moederborden-een-oudere-chipset-is-de-betere-keuze.html#anchor_energiegebruik |
|
![]() |
|
eccential ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Oct 2022 Location: Nevada Status: Offline Points: 6440 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So it is possible that putting 170W TDP CPUs on these things will get you lower performance than can be obtained on a more premium motherboard.
That is good to know. It's not useful to me, because even if I had a 9950X3D or something, I'd run it with all BOOST disabled and TDP set to 105W or at most 120W. I'm just weird that way. I mean, how many people do you know who runs their 9800X3D at 65W TDP (88W PPT) mode? In fact, after experimenting with DRAM settings, I settled on 5200MT/s, even though I have 5600MT/s DIMMs. The IOD's voltage (and therefore its power consumption) is closely tied to UCLK (memory controller clock). Running it as 2800MHz (1:1 for 5600MT/s) requires close to 1.2V for SOC, at least for the chip I have. Running it at 1:2 (1400MHz) dropped that to under 0.9V. SOC power consumption dropped by like half! For someone running it at 65W TDP, that's a lot of power that can be given to the Cores instead. But I didn't want to run 1:2 mode, so settled on 2600MHz UCLK (1:1 for 5200MT/s), which set the VSOC at just over 1.1V. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 234 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |