AB350 Cool & Quiet breaks overclock |
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Author | |
potyec
Newbie Joined: 21 Mar 2017 Location: Budapest Status: Offline Points: 28 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have the same issue .. ASRock Fatal1ty Gaming K4 AB350 When I use stock nothing problem but -> when I OC to 3.7 Ghz +1.25v ( I have updated bios 1.43) after when I run Cinebench it shows me 3.7Ghz but meanwhile CPU-Z showing me 2694 Mhz +0.51v ( OCCT same ) Edited by potyec - 21 Mar 2017 at 1:50am |
|
mkmcgregor
Newbie Joined: 12 Jul 2016 Location: Alabama Status: Offline Points: 219 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes. It is set to the High Power mode. That is the only change of the various web setting modifications made; did NOT change the high speed interrupt setting nor the SMT to 0.
|
|
wardog
Moderator Group Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
AMD highly suggests that the Windows Power Plan you are running be set in Performance mode.
Check what yours is and post back please. |
|
mkmcgregor
Newbie Joined: 12 Jul 2016 Location: Alabama Status: Offline Points: 219 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
When a manual overclock is set in BIOS, e.g. 3.8GHz on all cores and 1.35v, and Cool & Quiet option is disabled, the system boots and runs as expected an all utilities show 3.8GHz or just below; 3.795 or the like. Benchmarks return results as expected; CPU-Z Bench Stress multi-core runs around 19500. If the only change made is to enable Cool & Quiet, the system now boots and Ryzen Master shows 2.7GHz in the speed "dial". Windows Task Manager on the Performance tab shows Max CPU speed 3.8GHz, and when under stress Actual Speed just under 2.7; again around 2.695. CPU-Z Bench Stress shows just over 14000 which implies that the numbers are not being reported wrong and the CPU is actually running slower; a lot slower. AIDA64, when stressing, shows 100% utilization, yet task manager shows all CPU threads running only exactly at 80%. This is just bizarre. I would prefer if when idle the CPU would clock down to save CPU life, power, and heat. The same testing with C & Q enabled works fine when core clock is set to auto; 3.0 and 3.2 on all cores max. Everything shows and works normally then; other than running a little slower. It seems to be the combination of C & Q and manual overclock; same 2.7GHz when I tried 3.5 GHz manual overclock.
Anyone else seen this? Is this common behavior of C & Q when manually overclocked? Is it assumed that if you push the CPU you never want it to down clock when idle? My I5-6600K speed steps down find from 4.5GHz OC and appears to go much lower in clock down than Ryzen will; lowest I saw was around 2.3Ghz when I used the successful Auto core clock with C & Q option. Any info would be appreciated!
|
|
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |