AGESA 1.0.0.6 |
Post Reply | Page <12345 21> |
Author | |
Xaltar
Moderator Group Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 24653 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The UEFI on all AM4 boards is still under development, both by AMD and manufacturers. Rest assured, whatever issues AGESA 1.0.0.6 has will likely be ironed out, either by AMD or by manufacturers. We will either see a 1.0.0.7 or a vendor level fix. I don't have any details other than it is being worked on by ASRock and AMD both. It will, like all things, take time. Bare in mind however that AMD is not like intel, the AM4 platform will likely be compatible with several processor generations. This means that your board will serve you for quite some time to come
|
|
|
|
oile
Newbie Joined: 01 Jun 2017 Status: Offline Points: 10 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
That's why I ditched Intel after so many years in favour of AMD. And that's also why I've been spending time writing about my feedback :)
Thank you |
|
Xaltar
Moderator Group Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 24653 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have always loved that about AMD too. Finally there is a competitive architecture from AMD again
I am looking forward to Zen APUs, that should be interesting.
|
|
|
|
Heuvanek
Newbie Joined: 10 Apr 2017 Status: Offline Points: 19 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I was not really loving AMD, I was only buying some APU for my family.
I was only with intel for my PCs. But Motherboard troubles (I get 4 motherboard for my 2600K, at the end, i was tired), and the joke by intel on the consummers to not do nothing during 6 years convince me to try AMD. (whearas price were explosing) Else, thanks you for your answer Xaltar. PS : sry for my bad english not native, i do what i can ^^ Edited by Heuvanek - 04 Jun 2017 at 5:52pm |
|
wardog
Moderator Group Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You don't verify what they'll do on an Intel system. Why would you???????? It is painstakingly done on the system they are to run on. Verify on the Ryzen system you have. It's slow arduous and tedius. With you becoming very VERY familiar with reaching for the Reset switch, and clearing the CMOS |
|
eldragon0
Newbie Joined: 05 Jun 2017 Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
EDIT:
Looks like 2.34 and 2.36 are floating around the Forums here with 1.0.0.6 for Taichi. Guess I have some fun to do tonight :D Edited by eldragon0 - 06 Jun 2017 at 12:29am |
|
Xaltar
Moderator Group Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 24653 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I will be testing L2.34 on my Taichi once I have my system built. I will backup and upload it if anyone wants it. It will be a few days though, I am waiting on a few parts still.
|
|
|
|
Spawne32
Newbie Joined: 11 May 2017 Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I assume no beta bios for the AB350M Pro4? My only other beef with that board is the fact that you cannot edit LLC (load line control) assuming it has it, which it seems like it does. And SOC voltage cannot be changed and it appears that the second system fan header has no control as well. I assume it defaults to the settings system fan 1 uses but I cannot verify.
|
|
PinetreeRoad
Newbie Joined: 06 Jun 2017 Status: Offline Points: 32 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
Can someone tell me where I can report BIOS bugs? I have been testing the beta BIOS for the x370 Pro Gaming L2.36, and it still has the exact same RAM OC bug that the latest stable BIOS has L2.30.
It would be nice if I can report this now before Asrock finalizes the BIOS, because this bug makes memory overclocking a real pain. I almost RMA'd my board because I though it was broken until this bug was pointed out to me in an overclocking video somewhere. IIRC that guy was on a 1.xx version of the Taichi BIOS so this bug has been around for a while. I'm also going to post the bug here so that people on the forum and googling around can find this and be aware of this issue. This bug is present on the latest stable BIOS and the latest beta BIOS. This bug effects the X370 Pro Gaming and the x370 Taichi IIRC. When memory overclocking, if you choose any speed or setting that is unstable and will not pass post. You MUST clear CMOS to apply ANY memory settings or it will never pass post outside of the default memory speeds (in my case DDR4 2400). Even if you apply memory settings that you know for a fact are stable, and have passed post before. It will never pass post until you clear CMOS after failing post during the retries. For example: You set 3600MHz as your memory speed, it doesn't pass post. After the retries it resets back to default. Go right into the BIOS when it boots up after the retries. You enable the XMP profile, you will still not pass post ever. Even if you have booted with the XMP profile before. The board just gets stuck in this loop until you clear CMOS or reset to default settings in the BIOS and reboot without changing anything. If requested I can record a short video showing this, incase this doesn't make sense. It was a bit difficult for me to articulate this issue. As you can imagine this makes memory overclocking a serious pain in the ass. As I found out last night. Hopefully we can get this fixed soon. |
|
Denroth
Newbie Joined: 02 Apr 2017 Status: Offline Points: 46 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
@wardog a question
Your platform (I have the same motherboard + r7 1700 and ram gskill ripjaws b-die 3200mhz cl15) X370 Killer SLI / AC, 1500X, H115i, CMK16GX4M2B3600C18 which frequency keep your ram? you manage to bring them to 3200mhz? On my platform are unstable even with 1.4v 16-16-16-36 Edited by Denroth - 06 Jun 2017 at 6:10pm |
|
Post Reply | Page <12345 21> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |