ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical Support > AMD Motherboards
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Asrock fatal1ty x370 gaming x - Bios updates
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

Asrock fatal1ty x370 gaming x - Bios updates

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
jarankomsiluk View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 2018
Status: Offline
Points: 22
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jarankomsiluk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Asrock fatal1ty x370 gaming x - Bios updates
    Posted: 02 Feb 2019 at 3:43pm
Hello, can anyone tell me how important are the new bios updates for my motherboard.. do i really need to sacrifice my old update (3.60v) for newest (5.20v) will that anyhow increase any performance for my pc or something? (Is it worth doing and why?! )Tnxx..
Back to Top
kerberos_20 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Dec 2017
Location: czech republic
Status: Offline
Points: 3687
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kerberos_20 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Feb 2019 at 5:14pm
theres no performance improvment from bios side, if u got no issues with your current setup then u dont need new bios, u may need it later on when u will be switching your cpu to ryzen 2xxx or better
Back to Top
jarankomsiluk View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 2018
Status: Offline
Points: 22
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jarankomsiluk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 10:04pm
Wow yea not thinking about changing cpu anytime soon, I am very satisfied right now.. the question, If I may ask,
will the new radeon navi gpu bottleneck my Ryzen 5 1600x cpu? (ofc you cant 100% know this but if you can give me your opinon would be great )
Back to Top
xhue View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 17 Aug 2018
Status: Offline
Points: 634
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote xhue Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Feb 2019 at 11:20pm
I don't think so, personally.

New Navi (or VII) is not an extremely powerful card. 1440p and below you should easily max out everything, while @ 4K your FPS will drop because of the GPU.

VR & 4K still need insane GPU if you want good FPS and all the bling. Realtime ray-tracing is still far from the mainstream games.
Back to Top
Xaltar View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 16 May 2015
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 27413
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Xaltar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Feb 2019 at 12:28am
I agree with Xhue, speculation puts the new Radeon VII at around 2080 performance but without Real Time Ray Tracing. A 1600x should still be more than up to the task, especially at resolutions higher than 1080p. A lot of people see reviews and see intel CPUs (for example) scoring higher FPS with the GPUs being tested and assume that anything less is a bottleneck on the part of the CPU. This is not true, all too often it is simply better optimization for intel's architecture in a given title's game engine. Ryzen, from a software optimization standpoint, is still very new. This year and next we will start seeing the gap close between comparable intel and AMD CPUs in gaming scenarios.

In short, the Ryzen 1600x is a 6 core 12 thread CPU, more than up to the task with any currently and soon to be available GPU.
Back to Top
jarankomsiluk View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 2018
Status: Offline
Points: 22
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jarankomsiluk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Feb 2019 at 6:00pm
Just the answer i was looking for ,very straight foward i like it ! :D Thanks !
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.