|
taichi bios v2.40 (agesa 1006) is out, feedback |
Post Reply 
|
Page <123> |
| Author | |
datonyb 
Senior Member 
Joined: 11 Apr 2017 Location: London U.K. Status: Offline Points: 3139 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 10 Jun 2017 at 1:48am |
|
try manually entering the exact timings from the ram sticker (this may be different to what the bios is auto setting)
next set the SOC volts to 1,1 enable 2t and try that |
|
|
[url=https://valid.x86.fr/jpg250]
 [/url]3800X, powercolor reddevil vega64, gskill tridentz3866, taichix370, evga750watt gold |
|
 |
|
|
GenesisDoes
Newbie 
Joined: 10 Apr 2017 Status: Offline Points: 54 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jun 2017 at 7:37am |
|
I'm getting the same results as with the Beta Bios (2.34/2.36). My 2x16GB G.skill TridentZ F4-3200C16D-32GTZKW ram rated for 16-18-18-38 can reach 3066 (16-16-16-37). Will not post at 3200 no matter what I try. Keep in mind that for AGESA 1.0.0.4a and before, the max it would go was 2400. Command Rate 1 or 2 doesn't help matters for me so I just leave it at 1.
 |
|
|
Taichi X370, Ryzen 1700 @ 4ghz, 32GB G.Skill TridentZ Ram, Samsung 960 EVO nvme, Intel 600P nvme, 2TB Seagate HDD, 2TB Hitachi HDD, 1TB Mushkin SSD, GTX 1080
|
|
|
|
|
Optik
Newbie
Joined: 23 Apr 2017 Status: Offline Points: 35 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jun 2017 at 9:17am |
|
be happy that u can run with 3000 , u have 16gb rams.
what u can try give your cpu 1,85-1,20 vcore with 3,8 ghz ( 3,6-3,8ghz sweetspot of ryzen )with 1.1 soc voltage less OC more dram speed. 3,8ghz 110W 3,9ghz 155W that is 45W more 4 only 100mhz and that is with a liquid cooler if u running with air u reach 180W because u need more vcore
Edited by Optik - 10 Jun 2017 at 9:31am |
|
|
Taichi X370
AMD R7 1700X Arctic Liquid FreeZer 240 G.Skill Flare X 3200 cl 14@2933 PowerColer RX480 Phanteks EnTHoo Luxe BeQuiet Dark Power Pro 11 550W |
|
|
|
|
D7omepro
Newbie
Joined: 10 Jun 2017 Location: Saudi Arabia Status: Offline Points: 15 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jun 2017 at 9:34am |
|
|
|
MrMajestyk
Newbie
Joined: 05 May 2017 Status: Offline Points: 9 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jun 2017 at 11:21am |
|
cool stuff  with beta one I knew I can run 3333 with my 2x16GB RAM so this time after enabling XMP I went straight 3333Mhz setting, 1.385v for dram, Soc 1.0, 60 Ohm, gear and power down disabled, command rate 1. I may do some memtest later   Edited by MrMajestyk - 10 Jun 2017 at 11:40am |
|
|
|
|
MrMajestyk
Newbie
Joined: 05 May 2017 Status: Offline Points: 9 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jun 2017 at 4:14pm |
|
quick update 3333 for ram wasn't stable, it would even freeze the bios and forced me to reset. Also 3200 with 12-12-12 or 14-12-12-12 was a no go, so have it "standart" at 3200 14-14-14-34 which is what we wanted right but a pitty that further overclocking doesn't work
still finally we got pretty much sorted
|
|
|
|
|
Velajan
Newbie
Joined: 28 May 2017 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jun 2017 at 5:07pm |
|
Well, since it looks like my other posts was purged I'm just going to post the same thing.
My ram, Corsair Vengeance LED CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 (SK Hynix), went from being able to do 2666Mhz at 18-18-18-36 to being unable to do anything over 2133mhz 15-15-15-36. It doesn't matter what timings I choose, it will not boot past 2133mhz with the AGESA 1006 update, and responds even worse when I switch the command rate from 1T to 2T where it won't boot at 2133mhz. Voltage is at 1.35, which I have played with up to 1.45, SoC is at 1.1, which I have played with up to 1.2. Nothing. Works. Did I just manage to pick the absolute worst ram available?
Edited by Velajan - 10 Jun 2017 at 5:08pm |
|
|
|
|
datonyb
Senior Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2017 Location: London U.K. Status: Offline Points: 3139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jun 2017 at 9:09pm |
|
another update here
after 12 hrs switched off/total off the cold boot issue returned with /14/14/14/14 timings (its a bit better than earlier bios which wouldnt cold boot anytime even 30 secs after switching off) trying again with a few more tweaks to bios e.g. ram up from 1.35 to 1.375 soc up from 1.0 v to 1.1 volt procODT now 60 ohms from auto command rate 2T geardown disabled lets see if it lets it cold boot now |
|
|
[url=https://valid.x86.fr/jpg250]
[/url]3800X, powercolor reddevil vega64, gskill tridentz3866, taichix370, evga750watt gold |
|
|
|
|
datonyb
Senior Member
Joined: 11 Apr 2017 Location: London U.K. Status: Offline Points: 3139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Jun 2017 at 10:27pm |
|
well i didnt even get that far
i got a crash just opening up a removable data disk to copy some files over so back to stock ram settings then............... not much advancement in my case it seems for latest bios |
|
|
[url=https://valid.x86.fr/jpg250]
[/url]3800X, powercolor reddevil vega64, gskill tridentz3866, taichix370, evga750watt gold |
|
|
|
|
oile
Newbie
Joined: 01 Jun 2017 Status: Offline Points: 10 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Jun 2017 at 5:33pm |
|
Bad experience on this 2.40 with my Hynix LPX 3000 C15 5.30 . 3200 was not stable in anyway at any setting I've tried (and trust me, I've tried EVERY setting I could). Weird and anti scientific behaviour changing ram settings. Had to clear cmos to start clean everytime and still getting strange Debug Codes especially in cold boots. 3066 stable but not only I didn't get any noticeble improvements, with all the agesa 1.0.0.6 betas and this stable release I get a stuttering experience on Battlefield 1. Seems like data flaw to the cpu is not as smooth as 2.30 agesa 1004 in any way, and I already reported this for the previous betas. Benchmarks and numbers seems not to show this actual drop in smoothness showing a little bit higher values, wich however do not correspond in any way to actual performance in games. I invite you guys to test your rig not only in stress tests but also in you real world usage, with real software you use every day. Higher numbers in FPS counters do not mean anything if the experience they give is disappointing. Back to 2.30, exact same settings, everything smooth. What a disappoint. So, summarizing, no improvements over agesa 1004 2.30, only hiccups and negative effects for my system and my Hynix ram. Also, BankGroupSwap setting not applying at all with this "stable" release. Could @wardog or @Xaltar please report to asrock engineers?
Thank you for sharing your experience and help each other |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <123> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options