AGESA 1.0.0.6b

MisterJ wrote: Sorry, Ricky.  It looks like the forum really messed up my post in your quote.  See my original post here: Ricky, what do you asking?   All the thread posters need to make sure they have read the first post.  Apparently there is no memory support changes, just a few bug fixes.  AMD also updated the microcode, but I have seen no explanation of what changed.  AMD and ASRock need to have their collective you-know-what kicked for very poor communication.  Enjoy, John. I have no enumeration of the bug fixes, just a few rare bugs.  What is the segfault issue?  If this is the Linux KVM/NPT issue, the answer is no.  Enjoy, John.

MisterJ wrote: [URL=][/URL]Ricky, what do you asking? ? All the thread posters need to make sure they have read the first post.? Apparently there is no memory support changes, just a few bug fixes.? AMD also updated the microcode, but I have seen no explanation of what changed.? AMD and ASRock need to have their collective you-know-what kicked for very poor communication.? Enjoy, John.

John, I mean what kind of bug fixed is included in new agesa. Especially the segfault issue, is it fixed by new microcode?

Edited by Ricky - 03 Sep 2017 at 11:19pm

soleil14 wrote: Bios 3.0 is perfect for my X370 Taichi. So I don't reaaly want to update to 3.1 My only concern: does it lower the post time? I want to run high bus ram with AM4 training boot off to lower the post time? Is it possible with bios 3.1?

Nop, 3.10 rather increases the cold boot times. It cycles the fans one more time compared to 3.0.

With 'quality' of most UEFI versions, I think it's way better to give any new version at least a couple of months, before you update. As the vendors themselves say, if you currently have no issues - better don't install new versions of UEFI. ~230 EUR is not a small amount of money to just burn it.

Guys like me, with nothing to lose, or simply wanting to try the latest features and fixes, can always hop on the beta testing wagon and do the dirty work for everyone.

Ricky, what do you asking?
 
All the thread posters need to make sure they have read the first post.  Apparently there is no memory support changes, just a few bug fixes.  AMD also updated the microcode, but I have seen no explanation of what changed.  AMD and ASRock need to have their collective you-know-what kicked for very poor communication.  Enjoy, John.

datonyb wrote: agreed marc i did mine shortly after my post above didnt really look around at changes (if any to see) i did notice also the microcode change ram and cpu settings are as stable as they were in all previous bios for myself v1.6/v2/v2.3/v3 and running 3.9ghz @1.3 volts now (pstate voltage selection 28) EDIT maybe the microcode address the linux issue that i read about in the last week cant remember exactly what but it was supposed to be cured on later manufacture of ryzen or something myabe this code was to cure the early ones ?