NEW AM4 BIOSes as of March 6 2018 |
Post Reply | Page <12345 8> |
Author | ||
wardog
Moderator Group Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Welcome Christoph https://community.amd.com/community/gaming/blog/2017/05/25/community-update-4-lets-talk-dram |
||
Handrox
Newbie Joined: 06 Feb 2018 Status: Offline Points: 20 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I would like to say that it is stable in 90% of applications, I can for example install the system with RAM at 3600MHz without problems, play some games for hours, and some games like BF1, PUBG, TW3 for example do not stay stable and have random closures without time or even reset the machine. Already 3466MHz CL14 with all tight timmings work 100% solid rock. |
||
Asrock X370 Taichi + Ryzen 1700X@3.8GHz + 2x8GB GSkill TridentZ 3600MHz@3466MHz CL14 + MSi GTX 1070 Armor 2 OC
|
||
Christoph
Newbie Joined: 09 Mar 2018 Status: Offline Points: 10 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Christoph
Newbie Joined: 09 Mar 2018 Status: Offline Points: 10 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
same with me, ram at 3466, is not stable at 3600, but with bios 3.30 was more stable than with the 4.40 now, with 3.30 bios I could post to windows even surf the net but with 4.40 it doesn't even post, that is why I haven't flash to 4.60 even more since there since to be a RAM performance drop
|
||
wardog
Moderator Group Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Whatever you do, don't go below the BIOS rev that first accommodates whatever proc you Sig should be informing us of. |
||
wardog
Moderator Group Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Wut? |
||
Jm62383
Newbie Joined: 03 Apr 2017 Location: White Cloud, MI Status: Offline Points: 87 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Jm62383
Newbie Joined: 03 Apr 2017 Location: White Cloud, MI Status: Offline Points: 87 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I just ran aida64 and got 41700 read scores...I want to say I was in the 50+ with 3.00...something is def not right.
|
||
PetrolHead
Groupie Joined: 07 Oct 2015 Status: Offline Points: 403 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
By the way, 3466MHz sounds about as good a memory speed as you can get with Ryzen 1. Even 3200MHz is a good result and may be tough to achieve without Samsung B-Die memory.
|
||
Ryzen 5 1500X, ASRock AB350M Pro4, 2x8 GB G.Skill Trident Z 3466CL16, Sapphire Pulse RX Vega56 8G HBM2, Corsair RM550x, Samsung 960 EVO SSD (NVMe) 250GB, Samsung 850 EVO SSD 500 GB, Windows 10 64-bit
|
||
PetrolHead
Groupie Joined: 07 Oct 2015 Status: Offline Points: 403 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Maybe it's some sort of a stability issue then. In any case, I had a chance to check my numbers and on my system (at its current settings) the benchmark results were actually very stable. Five benchmark runs and memory read was always 46xxx, memory write 45xxx, and memory copy varied around 400 points. The latency mostly varied between 77.7 and 77.6 nanoseconds, but one result was 76.8ns, so even more notable outliers are possible. The latencies of L1-L3 were rock solid on these settings and generally the variance was very small, except for the L3 results, where transfer rates for L3 read, for example, could vary between 257.xx and 325.xx. In short, something really weird is going on if 4.60 drops your figures by that much. I assume you double checked that the timings and everything that were set in the BIOS also showed up with other programs like CPU-Z or Ryzen Timing Checker? |
||
Ryzen 5 1500X, ASRock AB350M Pro4, 2x8 GB G.Skill Trident Z 3466CL16, Sapphire Pulse RX Vega56 8G HBM2, Corsair RM550x, Samsung 960 EVO SSD (NVMe) 250GB, Samsung 850 EVO SSD 500 GB, Windows 10 64-bit
|
||
Post Reply | Page <12345 8> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |