ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical Support > AMD Motherboards
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - NEW AM4 BIOSes as of March 6 2018
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

NEW AM4 BIOSes as of March 6 2018

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 8>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Zwu View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 12 Jun 2017
Status: Offline
Points: 63
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Zwu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Mar 2018 at 11:33pm
i'm not impressed by this bios, ram stability seems even worse than before. with this update 3200mhz is pretty unstable on my gflaresX.

plus side bios boots with 3444ish mhz but instant crashes in win

i'm not content until i have my 3200mhz rated rams at their designed speed
Back to Top
Handrox View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Feb 2018
Status: Offline
Points: 20
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Handrox Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Mar 2018 at 11:06pm
Originally posted by PetrolHead PetrolHead wrote:

Hmm. Interesting. I'll have to test that scenario on my system, since I haven't noticed any major issues in PUBG. These are the averages of five AIDA benchmark runs I've done on my current setup:

Memory Read: 46849.6 MB/s
Memory Write: 45354.4 MB/s
Memory Copy: 40837.8 MB/s
Memory Latency: 77.48 ns

L1 Cache Read: 459.156 GB/s
L1 Cache Write: 230.184 GB/s
L1 Cache Copy: 459.12 GB/s
L1 Cache Latency: 1.1 ns

L2 Cache Read: 433.8 GB/s
L2 Cache Write: 225.972 GB/s
L2 Cache Copy: 388.276 GB/s
L2 Cache Latency: 4.7 ns

L3 Cache Read: 306.972 GB/s
L3 Cache Write: 218.552 GB/s
L3 Cache Copy: 292.34 GB/s
L3 Cache Latency: 12.2 ns

Just based on these numbers, I should be experiencing similar or worse performance issues. It may be that I'm just not paying attention to occasional stutters or that I've just never used the map while looking through a scope. I'll take your word for the change in performance and transfer rate numbers, but the whole thing just seems odd and it would be interesting to know what the root cause is.


As you can follow the link I left in an earlier post, everyone who tested accused the same problem I reported, a dizzying drop in RAM transfer rates. One thing, they accentuate more when overclocking the CPU ...

Asrock X370 Taichi + Ryzen 1700X@3.8GHz + 2x8GB GSkill TridentZ 3600MHz@3466MHz CL14 + MSi GTX 1070 Armor 2 OC
Back to Top
PetrolHead View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 07 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 403
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PetrolHead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Mar 2018 at 10:51pm
Hmm. Interesting. I'll have to test that scenario on my system, since I haven't noticed any major issues in PUBG. These are the averages of five AIDA benchmark runs I've done on my current setup:

Memory Read: 46849.6 MB/s
Memory Write: 45354.4 MB/s
Memory Copy: 40837.8 MB/s
Memory Latency: 77.48 ns

L1 Cache Read: 459.156 GB/s
L1 Cache Write: 230.184 GB/s
L1 Cache Copy: 459.12 GB/s
L1 Cache Latency: 1.1 ns

L2 Cache Read: 433.8 GB/s
L2 Cache Write: 225.972 GB/s
L2 Cache Copy: 388.276 GB/s
L2 Cache Latency: 4.7 ns

L3 Cache Read: 306.972 GB/s
L3 Cache Write: 218.552 GB/s
L3 Cache Copy: 292.34 GB/s
L3 Cache Latency: 12.2 ns

Just based on these numbers, I should be experiencing similar or worse performance issues. It may be that I'm just not paying attention to occasional stutters or that I've just never used the map while looking through a scope. I'll take your word for the change in performance and transfer rate numbers, but the whole thing just seems odd and it would be interesting to know what the root cause is.


Edited by PetrolHead - 08 Mar 2018 at 10:52pm
Ryzen 5 1500X, ASRock AB350M Pro4, 2x8 GB G.Skill Trident Z 3466CL16, Sapphire Pulse RX Vega56 8G HBM2, Corsair RM550x, Samsung 960 EVO SSD (NVMe) 250GB, Samsung 850 EVO SSD 500 GB, Windows 10 64-bit
Back to Top
Handrox View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Feb 2018
Status: Offline
Points: 20
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Handrox Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Mar 2018 at 10:37pm
Originally posted by PetrolHead PetrolHead wrote:

Okay, so one test after each update. Every benchmark (Aida, 3DMark, Geekbench etc.) fluctuates by some amount between runs, so you should run the benchmark at least three times for each BIOS version to get some idea on how much the results differ between each run. You should also probably wait some time before running the benchmark after booting up, since there can be all sorts of stuff going on in the background even after you have access to your desktop.

Also, I didn't say the differences in speeds are marginal, but they may be explained by other things than the BIOS. The latency differences on the other hand look marginal, but you won't know for sure until you do several runs with the same exact setup. For example, back when I was experimenting with RAM timings, the L3 cache results could vary quite a bit (over 20% for transfer rates and even jumps from 12.2ns to 20ns for the latency).

I'm not on my personal computer right now, but I'll see if I can post some of my AIDA results later today, just to show more accurately what I mean. The results of course only apply to my system, but they might illustrate my point better.

Yes, a lot of tests were done, even because I did not believe in what I saw, wondering why this variation down so sharply in the numbers of transfer rates. If you notice a worse performance for example when playing some games, the game that is most noticeable is the PUBG, does not change the framerate much, but if you notice gagging during the game even more when you need a zoom of the map when using a telescope sight . I spent about 2 days with this 4.60 BIOS testing things and if you notice a lower system performance than I have with 4.40, this 4.40 BIOS is phenomenal, my system is very good with it, I updated to 4.60 more out of curiosity and see if the new Agesa allowed me to reach the 3600MHz in a 100% stable way and to be able to use my RAM in its due XMP
Asrock X370 Taichi + Ryzen 1700X@3.8GHz + 2x8GB GSkill TridentZ 3600MHz@3466MHz CL14 + MSi GTX 1070 Armor 2 OC
Back to Top
PetrolHead View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 07 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 403
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PetrolHead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Mar 2018 at 10:20pm
Okay, so one test after each update. Every benchmark (Aida, 3DMark, Geekbench etc.) fluctuates by some amount between runs, so you should run the benchmark at least three times for each BIOS version to get some idea on how much the results differ between each run. You should also probably wait some time before running the benchmark after booting up, since there can be all sorts of stuff going on in the background even after you have access to your desktop.

Also, I didn't say the differences in speeds are marginal, but they may be explained by other things than the BIOS. The latency differences on the other hand look marginal, but you won't know for sure until you do several runs with the same exact setup. For example, back when I was experimenting with RAM timings, the L3 cache results could vary quite a bit (over 20% for transfer rates and even jumps from 12.2ns to 20ns for the latency).

I'm not on my personal computer right now, but I'll see if I can post some of my AIDA results later today, just to show more accurately what I mean. The results of course only apply to my system, but they might illustrate my point better.


Edited by PetrolHead - 08 Mar 2018 at 10:20pm
Ryzen 5 1500X, ASRock AB350M Pro4, 2x8 GB G.Skill Trident Z 3466CL16, Sapphire Pulse RX Vega56 8G HBM2, Corsair RM550x, Samsung 960 EVO SSD (NVMe) 250GB, Samsung 850 EVO SSD 500 GB, Windows 10 64-bit
Back to Top
Handrox View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Feb 2018
Status: Offline
Points: 20
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Handrox Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Mar 2018 at 9:56pm
Originally posted by PetrolHead PetrolHead wrote:

Handrox, the latency differences are more or less margin of error stuff. The benchmarked speeds can also vary from run to run depending on what the OS may or may not do in the background. Are these only samples from a larger set of test runs or did you just test once with each BIOS version?

They are tests done after each BIOS update, when I will check if the modifications made effective, functional and stable.

The differences are not marginal, with BIOS 4.60 the rates are locked around 47500 in the read, 47500 in the write and 43500 in the data copy. (approximate numbers) Do not go beyond that, then fell from 56,000 approximate to 47,000 approximate between BIOS 4.40 and 4.60, it's a lot ...

Greetings


Edited by Handrox - 08 Mar 2018 at 9:59pm
Asrock X370 Taichi + Ryzen 1700X@3.8GHz + 2x8GB GSkill TridentZ 3600MHz@3466MHz CL14 + MSi GTX 1070 Armor 2 OC
Back to Top
PetrolHead View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 07 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 403
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PetrolHead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Mar 2018 at 9:46pm
Handrox, the latency differences are more or less margin of error stuff. The benchmarked speeds can also vary from run to run depending on what the OS may or may not do in the background. Are these only samples from a larger set of test runs or did you just test once with each BIOS version?
Ryzen 5 1500X, ASRock AB350M Pro4, 2x8 GB G.Skill Trident Z 3466CL16, Sapphire Pulse RX Vega56 8G HBM2, Corsair RM550x, Samsung 960 EVO SSD (NVMe) 250GB, Samsung 850 EVO SSD 500 GB, Windows 10 64-bit
Back to Top
Handrox View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 06 Feb 2018
Status: Offline
Points: 20
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Handrox Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Mar 2018 at 9:28pm
Originally posted by JohnM JohnM wrote:

Originally posted by Handrox Handrox wrote:

I just upgraded the system to the new P4.60 BIOS, again the transfer rates are far below normal, almost 5000MB less than in version 4.40 of the Taichi X370 BIOS. The latencies are also slightly higher, appreciably higher .. Is there any explanation?

Transfer rates and latencies of what? Can you please give more detail about what you are doing and how you are measuring these differences. Your use of the word "again" suggests there is an ongoing discussion about this - can you provide a link to it, please?

Good morning, yes, RAM transfer rates. They fall a lot when upgrading to BIOS 4.41 and 4.60, testing things that discovered that this is accentuated when overclocking the CPU, with the same in stock not seen this problem in this dimension.


* The discussion can be found at this link: http://www.overclock.net/forum/11-amd-motherboards/1627407-asrock-x370-taichi-overclocking-thread-314.html

There you can find more reports on other problems we are encountering

Thank you for your attention, have a good day.

Allí puede encontrar más informes sobre otros problemas que estamos encontrando 

Gracias por su atención, tenga un buen día.


Update: 

These tests were done with BIOS 4.41, so does BIOS 4.60 and with transfer rate losses in the same ratio compared to BIOS 4.40 or 3.20






Edited by Handrox - 08 Mar 2018 at 9:33pm
Asrock X370 Taichi + Ryzen 1700X@3.8GHz + 2x8GB GSkill TridentZ 3600MHz@3466MHz CL14 + MSi GTX 1070 Armor 2 OC
Back to Top
MikeBE View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 04 Mar 2018
Location: New jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MikeBE Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Mar 2018 at 9:15pm
I successfully flashed my AB350-ITX to P4.60 from 4.43 (beta).

This has a Ryzen 5 2400G. I found that the CPU is running measurably better with this BIOS, particularly in gaming, which is how this box is being used.



-Mike Elek
http://photographytoday.net
Back to Top
PetrolHead View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 07 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 403
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote PetrolHead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Mar 2018 at 9:00pm
Originally posted by donalgodon donalgodon wrote:

Which BIOS is recommended for the 1st Generation Ryzen on the AsRock AB350M Pro4?

Should 1st Generation Ryzen users upgrade to these latest BIOS or should we stick with the Bridge BIOS (3.40 in my case)


To expand on what datonyb said, any version that is stable and provides the functionalities you need, is recommended. Even if it's an older version. If 3.40 has served you well, there's no real reason to take the risks involved with updating the BIOS. My AB350M Pro4 is running on 3.30 at the moment and I haven't had any major issues. I'm interested in finding out what the newest version brings, though. Since there are no proper release notes, the only option is to install it and see. Decisions, decisions...

P.S. Remember to also keep an eye on the AMD all in 1 driver and possibly other drivers as well. It's often worth keeping these as up to date as possible.
Ryzen 5 1500X, ASRock AB350M Pro4, 2x8 GB G.Skill Trident Z 3466CL16, Sapphire Pulse RX Vega56 8G HBM2, Corsair RM550x, Samsung 960 EVO SSD (NVMe) 250GB, Samsung 850 EVO SSD 500 GB, Windows 10 64-bit
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 8>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.