|
Skylade Non-K overclock issue |
Post Reply 
|
Page <12 |
| Author | |
Xaltar 
Moderator Group 
Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 25028 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 13 Jan 2016 at 1:56am |
|
That is odd, are you using the UEFI to set the overclock or XTU?
|
|
 |
|
|
wardog
Moderator Group
Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2016 at 2:00am |
|
00? Lower your OC a step at a time and post what happens and when.
|
|
|
|
|
tkcltoh
Newbie 
Joined: 11 Jan 2016 Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2016 at 8:00am |
|
Yes. I am using UEFI to do overclocking
|
|
|
|
|
tkcltoh
Newbie
Joined: 11 Jan 2016 Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2016 at 8:04am |
|
Hi, I have tried even with bclk set to 120 which is even lower than default 3.3GHz when turbo boast. For the first time after changing the setting in UEFI, there is no issue to boot into windows 10 and use it. When I perform restart from Windows 10 power button, there is also no issue. However, once I power down the system and power up again, I will end up with error code 00 and had to perform BIOS reset. |
|
|
|
|
tkcltoh
Newbie
Joined: 11 Jan 2016 Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jan 2016 at 1:55am |
|
After flashing to ver 2.6, i managed to overclock with bclk set 145, RAM frequency 2172 and vcolt at 1.35V. However, I will get code 04 and I need to press the reset button then the system will be able to boot into the system.... It seems like 145 is the maximum I can reach at this point of time.
|
|
|
|
|
Xaltar
Moderator Group
Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 25028 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jan 2016 at 2:24am |
|
That is at least an improvement. You have to understand that non-K overclocking is a very new feature and not one officially supported by intel so there are bound to be some issues with it. Many of these will likely be fixed but likely not all.
|
|
|
|
|
tkcltoh
Newbie
Joined: 11 Jan 2016 Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 3:15am |
|
with the latest ver2.70, it seems to fix some of the stability issue. Now, I am able to OC to 4320 MHz with bclk set to 160 with no error code issue. however, wins 10 crash when bclk set to 167. Shall monitor for a while before further tuning.
|
|
|
|
|
peroni
Newbie
Joined: 27 Dec 2015 Status: Offline Points: 65 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 3:49am |
|
Your CPU has a 33x multiplier
With a BLCK of 160 you would get over 5 GHz. Are you using the non turbo multiplier of 27x? UEFI does not allow you to force the 33x multiplier but you can get around that by using Asrock A-Tuning tool in windows. You could lower BCLK to 130 with 33x and still get ~ 4300MHz Edited by peroni - 24 Jan 2016 at 3:50am |
|
|
Z170 PRO4
i5 6600 2x8GB Corsair DDR3000 SSD 950 Pro (OS) 850 Evo (data) GTX 960 4GB 2x LCD |
|
|
|
|
wardog
Moderator Group
Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 6447 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 Jan 2016 at 5:03am |
|
Yea. It's a teeter-totter effect.
BCLK or RAM MHz Somewhere between the two in there is ideal. |
|
|
|
|
tkcltoh
Newbie
Joined: 11 Jan 2016 Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Feb 2016 at 4:21pm |
|
My multiplier has set at 27x when i choose non-turbo
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options