M2 SSD Compatability |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |
parsec
Moderator Group Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 4996 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I forgot to say, if you bought an M.2 to PCIe slot adapter card like this one:
http://www.amazon.com/Lycom-DT-120-PCIe-Adapter-Support/dp/B00MYCQP38 You could put it in the PCIE5 slot, and get PCIe 2.0 x4. That would put your video card down to x8, of course. Not sure if you could boot an OS from a PCIe slot with your board, but I don't know that it won't work either. Hopefully someone who has tried that and sees this will let us know. |
|
xPorta
Newbie Joined: 25 Aug 2016 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
HI Crazynex, parsec, Xalter and Phillium.
So, I appreciate the stuff I read on this thread.. good advice and info. I got the Samsung 950 Pro running with only one or two hiccups that were dealt with. Rig: ASRock Fatal1ty 990FX Killer, BIOS P1.60 01/06/2016 First, installing Ubuntu 16.04 to the 950 Pro in the mobo M.2 connector went with one hiccup. NO MBR on the device.. but no messages to indicate that. So, briefly, I did the install there (X2), but later got the ASUS PCIe to M.2 adapter card and redid the whole install there. So following the advice I found on the web:
So, benchmarks show that I'm using PCIe version 2 in the results... but I still like them and I can move the 950 Pro to my new machine when I upgrade.. like ASRock ZEN FX mobos this Christmas?. I'm dreaming.. so Benchmarks.. as they are, are here: http://imgur.com/a/NjGKb PCIe 3.0 would be faster. So I'm also running an Nvidia GX 750 Ti mid level graphics card. I noticed that if I run 4 HD 1080p movies at once in different VLC windows, , when I load a 4K movie on top of that, it gets choppy. Hard times! So that's when the SSD competes with the graphics card for bandwidth on the PCIe 2.0 bus, doing these tasks. Comments on the state of Ubuntu w.r.t. the device: it works.. but I notice that that benchmark pic doesn't show the device manufacturer nor the model. So, NVME works.. but some of the fluff software that exists for SATA isn't aware or can't use the NVME interface to get that info... today.. August 25, 2016. : ) |
|
parsec
Moderator Group Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 4996 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'm sure the 950 does not compete for bandwidth with the video card. The PCIe lane allocation depends on which PCIe slots are being used, since an x16 physical slot does not necessarily mean that it will be connected to 16 PCIe lanes. The 990FX chipset provides 38 PCIe 2.0 lanes, so on your board you do have two true PCIe 2.0 x16 slots, each with x16 PCIe 2.0 lanes. The PCIE3 slot is x16 physically, but x4 electrically, since it is only connected to 4 PCIe lanes. That is stated in the specs, and you can see the difference between the PCIE3 slot and the other two if you look carefully at the top down picture of your board. IMO, your 750 is simply choking on the load of that many 4K videos. You are lucky it does as well as it does now. You aren't using all of your PCIe 2.0 lanes now, and each device has its maximum lane connection now, you can't change that. Were you able to install the Samsung NMVe driver in Ubuntu? If not, Ubuntu must have its own NVMe driver. Strange that your 950 as the OS drive is MBR partitioned. In Windows, NVMe SSDs are GPT partitioned. No idea what's going on there. NVMe and SATA are two different interfaces, using different drivers and controllers. If the software used with SATA drives works with NVMe, that's just luck. |
|
xPorta
Newbie Joined: 25 Aug 2016 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi parsec,
Thanks for clearing up my misconception about the lane allocations. ++ Re: MBR I manually specified MBR using GParted to sidestep any UEFI and GTP friction with the OS installer. The UEFI is set in compatibility mode, so it was smooth. Re: 750 Ti I also have a bootable OCZ Vertex 4 on the system.. in running OS in that device with the vids stored on the NVMe 950 Pro... there was no stuttering. Re: NVMe driver It's been a native Linux kernel driver since kernel version 3.3 (18 March 2012) |
|
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |