![]() |
X870E Nova D4 on restart/cold boot |
Post Reply
|
Page <123 |
| Author | |
dom0xDee4
Newbie
Joined: 23 Apr 2026 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 240 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 May 2026 at 9:06pm |
|
I can't edit the post, but last two shots in BIOS what is different from default:
- default settings shown on the right (arrow pointing to those) - settings used in y-cruncher session on the left of arrow. |
|
![]() |
|
Xaltar
Moderator Group
Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37333 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 May 2026 at 11:49pm |
|
Not a bad way to go really, so long as you are still within your warranty just
use it. If something dies you can get it replaced (for certain) under warranty. If the symptoms worsen just RMA the CPU and/or motherboard. Odds are pretty high that a BIOS update might resolve the issue sometime soon. Thanks again for all your detailed info. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
dom0xDee4
Newbie
Joined: 23 Apr 2026 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 240 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2026 at 4:52am |
|
Yeah, all components bought in December 2025 (case is old model), Samsung NVME Gen5 bought in April 2026 - which is when i took other components out of their boxes and assembled everything - basically i'm fighting 4d ever since one of first cold boots this mobo / cpu / memory combo had in it's electronic life :)
I'm just unsure, given how it goes thru stress test - that nothing really is "broken". Think i should've chose better when i ordered memory. Something i don't think i mentioned too often before: it wakes up from standby happily, not even once has that failed fwiw. But evidence on different BIOS versions behaving differently kinda defeats "defect hardware" theory - i'd bet my money it's something in memory training subroutine - stress tests so far prove once it's over that hurdle, it....runs without hiccups. Except the "hurdle" seems to be a moving target on occasion. I did have it in various ambient temps, ranges it had seen is 18°C to 25°C - it made no difference, 4d pops-up when it feels like so :D |
|
![]() |
|
dom0xDee4
Newbie
Joined: 23 Apr 2026 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 240 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 4 hours 27 minutes ago at 6:04am |
|
Hello, i have some actual news.
So yesterday had a very dedicated debug session (7hr+, well into early morning hours...) Memory speed, voltages, etc perhaps play some role, but it ain't down to that. Sometime in last 3rd of that long session, i have OC'ed the memory to 6000 MT/s @1.32V - same timings as XMP-1 profile from it. (kit is rated for 5600 MT/s, 1.25V). Also, i have noticed sometime tRDWR ends up different (1 clock cycle) between A2 and B2 (not always). Memory is still @6000, currently little under one hour in y-cruncher Zen5 stress test. Most of those 7+ hours yesterday where spent doing the following: 1) restart from windows 2) restart to UEFI (from windows) using ASRock utility 3) Save and exit from UEFI (restart from UEFI after a change) 4) Shutdown from Windows (S5 state, plugged in, 5VSB) -> Power on (boot) 5) Shutdown from Windows (S5 state) -> Flip switch on PSU (G3 state) -> Toggle switch on PSU -> Power on (boot) state 6) Press RESET key whenever 4d error occurred 7) Flip switch on PSU (G3 state) whenever 4d error occurred That is what i have been testing and noting down if there is a pattern when 4d occurs. Right towards the end i realized something which i actually managed to prove, but more on that later. So: 1) restart from windows: 4d occurred 0 (ZERO) times. 2) restart to UEFI (from windows) using ASRock utility: 4d occured 0 (ZERO) times. 3) Save and exit from UEFI (restart from UEFI after a change: 4d occured 0 (ZERO) times. 4) Shutdown from Windows (S5 state, plugged in, 5VSB) -> Power on (boot)- MOST of the time unsuccessful, 4d occurred in over 80% of cycles carried. 5) Shutdown from Windows (S5 state) -> Flip switch on PSU (G3 state) -> Toggle switch on PSU -> Power on (boot) state: MOST of the time successful, 4d occurred in about 30% of these type of cycles 6) Press RESET key whenever 4d error occurred - works sometimes. 7) Flip switch on PSU (G3 state) whenever 4d error occurred: Almost total success, 4d re-appeared less then 5% of these cycles carried (these i was forced into). For all of the tests, all timings were set manually - but taking "healthy" XMP-1 or values known good training had produced (readout by ZenTimings tool). 2 3rds of the time memory was in XMP-1 mode, rest OCe'd (still running same OC - made no observable difference to 4d randomness). Final notes. While testing, i got to learn when training will fail / 4d appear - VRM and CPU fans raise their RPM (not to max, but enough to be noticable). Most important and somewhat confusing note. I re-used one of 120mm fans i had lying around. Non-PWM fan, spins very fast. I didn't measure it's current draw, but it was plugged into AIO_Pump header, set to DC mode. Once i unplugged it, 4d occurence became way less. I have measured 12V, and it's bang on startup, 12.05 rock stable (probed somewhere). Enabling Deep sleep mode also dropped occurence of 4d error a bit more so - 4d occured in about 40% of cycles carried with this ACPI setting. If i have external 3.5'' USB HDD plugged in, i see code 99 persisting for a bit longer, and 4d again trips more often. I have plugged Corsair PSU USB cable (terminated in the form of USB 2.0 header) - into USB 2.0 header of xHCI Prom #1. This seems to also decrease occurence, otherwise this Prom21 chip is in power down mode until something is plugged to it. I can't draw any conclusion, but empirically as if some power-hiccup or current limit occurs after cold-start and training, and 4d gets tripped - this really looks like it has nothing with voltages set in BIOS, speed options, timings... A question. How much does mobo rely on grounding via standoffs? Case i have was painted inside and is no longer conductive - only partially where standoffs screw in (due to threads chewing thru paint and clear coat). 3A fan header specification is per-header? Following BIOS settings were used, but for all i know - it doesn't seem like there is defacto settings that would completely remove this oddity. PS. Wheter "Fast boot=Disabled"; "DF CStates=Disabled"; "PCIE Devices Power On=Disabled" have any influence on 4d occurence - i doubt and can't tell - my test data ain't granular as much. BIOS Settings list part 1 - on the left are settings used, on the right default BIOS values. ![]() BIOS Settings list part 2 - on the left are settings used, on the right default BIOS values. ![]() BIOS Settings list part 3 - on the left are settings used, on the right default BIOS values. (memory OC mode, Active memroy timing settings, ignore since timings used were ones from OC Tweaker) ![]() BIOS Home page..Note 6000 MT/s for this kit.. Very relaxed timings - basically whatever was in XMP-1. ![]() DF Cstates ![]() OC Tweaker ![]() Y-Cruncher, Dimm A2 and B2 temps: [img]https://i.postimg.cc/XqSZ7SfM/09-memory-temps-ycrunch-test.png[/img Y-cruncher, CPU temps ![]() Spec from HWinfo ![]()
|
|
![]() |
|
dom0xDee4
Newbie
Joined: 23 Apr 2026 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 240 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 4 hours 24 minutes ago at 6:07am |
|
EDIT: Forgotten one thing. I installed ASRBGLED utility (ASRock), and it updated "firmware" of something, didn't manage to capture screen of that sadly.
|
|
![]() |
|
Xaltar
Moderator Group
Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37333 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 4 hours 9 minutes ago at 6:22am |
|
This is brilliant info, thanks dom0xDee4. Hopefully ASRock will see this and get
something useful from it. To answer your questions: Yes, 3A is per header as far as I know. Grounding isn't critical but certainly doesn't hurt, particularly if you are experiencing electrical interference for some reason. Adding a grounding wire on a spade connector between the board and the case (being careful not to short anything around the mounting hole/ground plane) might be worth giving a shot. I would also ground the PSU casing to the PC case, that one is easy and safe to do. I am not sure if it will help but given your suspicion of some kind of power issue it's worth a shot. It may also be worth trying another PSU, just incase you have some ripple happening that isn't easy to measure with a regular multimeter. You typically need an oscilloscope to measure the ripple on power rails. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <123 |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |