ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical Support > AMD Motherboards
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - AB350 GAMING-ITX/AC and Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

AB350 GAMING-ITX/AC and Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
JohnM View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2018
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 267
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JohnM Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: AB350 GAMING-ITX/AC and Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15
    Posted: 24 Feb 2018 at 12:58am
Sounds like you're in a much happier place than when you started. Glad you got there.

Edited by JohnM - 24 Feb 2018 at 12:58am
ASRock Fatal1ty AB350 ITX P4.90, AMD Ryzen 5 2400G, 2x8GB Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16, 250GB Samsung 960EVO, 500GB Samsung 850EVO, 4TB WD Blue, Windows 10 Pro 64, Corsair SF450, Cooler Master Elite 110
Back to Top
Burnhill View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2018
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Burnhill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Feb 2018 at 3:33pm
Just to let people know, ran MemTest86 with 4 passes of full test with multithreading without a single error. Also ran IntelBurnTest with multiple stress levels and no issues.

Thanks again to everyone for the help! Handshake
Back to Top
Burnhill View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2018
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Burnhill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Feb 2018 at 8:47am
Originally posted by JohnM JohnM wrote:

AIDA64 is a pretty thorough test and produces an extensive report. It's not free but you can evaluate it for 30 days, which causes some of the information in the report to be redacted.

I would avoid BIOS 4.40 as it is broken in many places. The beta 4.43 is much better, but as you're not using a Raven Ridge APU you might be better sticking with 3.60 for the time being.

Thanks JohnM, will stick to 3.60 for now.
Back to Top
JohnM View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2018
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 267
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JohnM Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Feb 2018 at 7:47am
AIDA64 is a pretty thorough test and produces an extensive report. It's not free but you can evaluate it for 30 days, which causes some of the information in the report to be redacted.

I would avoid BIOS 4.40 as it is broken in many places. The beta 4.43 is much better, but as you're not using a Raven Ridge APU you might be better sticking with 3.60 for the time being.
ASRock Fatal1ty AB350 ITX P4.90, AMD Ryzen 5 2400G, 2x8GB Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16, 250GB Samsung 960EVO, 500GB Samsung 850EVO, 4TB WD Blue, Windows 10 Pro 64, Corsair SF450, Cooler Master Elite 110
Back to Top
Burnhill View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2018
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Burnhill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Feb 2018 at 7:36am
Right, after setting the speed to 2933 MHz as I mentioned earlier, I've now run single CPU and multithreading (1 pass each) successfully without any errors. (Yay!)

I'd like to make sure all is well with the CPU too, what's the best tool to test that? How about an overall hardware test (I'm running Win 10)?

Also, are there any potential issues updating BIOS to 4.40 at this stage? I noticed there was update available.

Oh, and why does MemTest86 report my memory so wrong? 2933 MHz at 15-17-17-35 vs 2133 MHz at 15-15-15-36.

Will prob still run a full 4 passes overnight to make sure it's all kosher. Thank you all for the help, feel more relieved now.


Edited by Burnhill - 23 Feb 2018 at 7:40am
Back to Top
kerberos_20 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Dec 2017
Location: czech republic
Status: Offline
Points: 3657
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kerberos_20 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Feb 2018 at 5:46am
as i can see from your memtest results, u dont have random errors, it seems u get errors at exact same bit (2nd bit from right)
this could be resolved with subtimings (tfaw, twrt, tref...etc)

but before that, try to reduce freqency a bit to see if there will be any change.
if there wont be any changes, then signal between cpu n ram is unstable which could be resolved with voltages/resistances


Edited by kerberos_20 - 23 Feb 2018 at 5:49am
Back to Top
JohnM View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2018
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 267
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JohnM Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Feb 2018 at 5:39am
Yes, I believe so. By choosing 2933 MHz you're "overclocking" the Ryzen's memory controller and a lot of other stuff too, including the Infinity Fabric. The only reason I can think of why you would want to revert to "stock" though is to set a baseline for some benchmarking you plan to do. Since you've bought the faster memory and you can run it at 2933, then why wouldn't you?
ASRock Fatal1ty AB350 ITX P4.90, AMD Ryzen 5 2400G, 2x8GB Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16, 250GB Samsung 960EVO, 500GB Samsung 850EVO, 4TB WD Blue, Windows 10 Pro 64, Corsair SF450, Cooler Master Elite 110
Back to Top
Burnhill View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2018
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Burnhill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Feb 2018 at 5:26am
Originally posted by JohnM JohnM wrote:

I think that there are two memory QVLs because the default maximum speed has been raised from 2667 MHz to 2933 MHz for Raven Ridge. Strictly speaking, anything over 2667 MHz for your 1000-series Ryzen is an overclock, while anything over 2933 MHz for Raven Ridge is an overclock.

Does that mean I should run it at 2667 MHz if I wanted to run it at 'stock' speeds on my CPU? Only go 2933 if I wanted to push it?
Back to Top
Burnhill View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2018
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Burnhill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Feb 2018 at 5:25am
Thanks for the replies guys. I've set the RAM to 2933 which is apparently the supported speed for these sticks on this MOBO. The BIOS shows the new speed correctly but MemTest86 still shows them as 2134MHz and 15-15-15-36 rather than the 15-17-17-35 I set them to in BIOS.

Just running single thread to see what happens.
Back to Top
JohnM View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2018
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 267
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JohnM Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Feb 2018 at 5:00am
Have you tried running MemTest in single thread mode?

I think that there are two memory QVLs because the default maximum speed has been raised from 2667 MHz to 2933 MHz for Raven Ridge. Strictly speaking, anything over 2667 MHz for your 1000-series Ryzen is an overclock, while anything over 2933 MHz for Raven Ridge is an overclock.
ASRock Fatal1ty AB350 ITX P4.90, AMD Ryzen 5 2400G, 2x8GB Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16, 250GB Samsung 960EVO, 500GB Samsung 850EVO, 4TB WD Blue, Windows 10 Pro 64, Corsair SF450, Cooler Master Elite 110
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.