ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Overclocking(OC) Zone > Achievement & Record
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 960 Pro specs released
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

960 Pro specs released

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
parsec View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4996
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote parsec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Sep 2016 at 11:27pm
Originally posted by DooRules DooRules wrote:

Still around, yes. Although running two systems now. Threw a 6950x in an R5V10 mobo with a Titan XP gpu. Monster combo Big smile

Samsung just keeps pushing the envelope for sure don't they.


No surprise there at all!

Since I've been in Broadwell-E land myself lately, I'll ask you about yours. I don't think you have a Haswell-E CPU to compare it to, so my questions may be hard to answer.

Given what I've experienced, and read about, Broadwell-E is not a great over clocking processor. It is common to hit a 4.3GHz limit for a core OC. The Cache runs slower than Haswell-E, 2.8GHz stock speed, and is maxed out at about 3.8GHz OC, if you are lucky.

I've read in the OCN Broadwell-E thread, which is almost 100% about Asus boards, about dead processors from over clocking. How often do we hear about that? I'm not blaming the boards, although there is talk about OC socket issues.

Then there is Intel's "Turbo Boost Max 3.0", which is not really a new type of Turbo boost. It selects the best cores to Turbo boost. Also, the BIOS option to limit clock speed when AVX instructions are running. Plus an Asus utility to protect the CPU or cores from high temperatures, I forget the name.

This all seems to be things to protect these processors, not features that enhance performance.

What are your general thoughts about these things, and your 6950X?
Back to Top
Xaltar View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 16 May 2015
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 36128
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Xaltar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Sep 2016 at 11:03pm
Nice to see you again Doo, I am sure you will be providing us with performance results of your own soon enough Cool
Back to Top
DooRules View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Location: Newfoundland
Status: Offline
Points: 122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DooRules Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Sep 2016 at 10:59pm
Still around, yes. Although running two systems now. Threw a 6950x in an R5V10 mobo with a Titan XP gpu. Monster combo Big smile

Samsung just keeps pushing the envelope for sure don't they.
Back to Top
parsec View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4996
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote parsec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Sep 2016 at 9:27pm
Originally posted by DooRules DooRules wrote:

not sure where I should post this guys so I put it here Tongue

960 is a beast of a drive

http://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/minisite/ssd/product/consumer/960pro.html?CID=AFL-hq-mul-0813-11000279


Well look who is still around, I thought you might have moved on to another Z170 board, made by someone else... Good to see you here again. Thumbs Up

Just reading about the 960 Pro, and a 960 EVO M.2 model too. Can you imagine, a 2TB 960 Pro model, with a rated endurance of 1.2PetaBytes! Shocked

Still nothing to cool the controller, we'll see how it is compared to the 950 Pro. Not that most reviews ever mention that.

Can you believe that Intel's new 600p M.2 SSD was meant to compete with or surpass the 950 Pro? The 600p cannot surpass the Samsung SM951 AHCI model's basic performance. Crucial (who is Intel's partner in their NAND fab business) had their version of the 600p planned for release, but won't bother doing so, they cancelled it. It uses TLC NAND. The 600p is a nice budget M.2 SSD, but that's it.

I really wonder about Intel's SSD business, they continue to either be outdone by Samsung, or make design mistakes over and over. Confused
Back to Top
DooRules View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Location: Newfoundland
Status: Offline
Points: 122
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DooRules Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Sep 2016 at 5:13pm
not sure where I should post this guys so I put it here Tongue

960 is a beast of a drive

http://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/minisite/ssd/product/consumer/960pro.html?CID=AFL-hq-mul-0813-11000279
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.