![]() |
960 Pro specs released |
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
| Author | |
parsec
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 4996 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Sep 2016 at 11:27pm |
No surprise there at all! Since I've been in Broadwell-E land myself lately, I'll ask you about yours. I don't think you have a Haswell-E CPU to compare it to, so my questions may be hard to answer. Given what I've experienced, and read about, Broadwell-E is not a great over clocking processor. It is common to hit a 4.3GHz limit for a core OC. The Cache runs slower than Haswell-E, 2.8GHz stock speed, and is maxed out at about 3.8GHz OC, if you are lucky. I've read in the OCN Broadwell-E thread, which is almost 100% about Asus boards, about dead processors from over clocking. How often do we hear about that? I'm not blaming the boards, although there is talk about OC socket issues. Then there is Intel's "Turbo Boost Max 3.0", which is not really a new type of Turbo boost. It selects the best cores to Turbo boost. Also, the BIOS option to limit clock speed when AVX instructions are running. Plus an Asus utility to protect the CPU or cores from high temperatures, I forget the name. This all seems to be things to protect these processors, not features that enhance performance. What are your general thoughts about these things, and your 6950X? |
|
![]() |
|
Xaltar
Moderator Group
Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 36128 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Sep 2016 at 11:03pm |
|
Nice to see you again Doo, I am sure you will be providing us with performance results of your own soon enough
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
DooRules
Newbie
Joined: 05 Nov 2015 Location: Newfoundland Status: Offline Points: 122 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Sep 2016 at 10:59pm |
|
Still around, yes. Although running two systems now. Threw a 6950x in an R5V10 mobo with a Titan XP gpu. Monster combo
![]() Samsung just keeps pushing the envelope for sure don't they.
|
|
![]() |
|
parsec
Moderator Group
Joined: 04 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 4996 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Sep 2016 at 9:27pm |
Well look who is still around, I thought you might have moved on to another Z170 board, made by someone else... Good to see you here again. ![]() Just reading about the 960 Pro, and a 960 EVO M.2 model too. Can you imagine, a 2TB 960 Pro model, with a rated endurance of 1.2PetaBytes! ![]() Still nothing to cool the controller, we'll see how it is compared to the 950 Pro. Not that most reviews ever mention that. Can you believe that Intel's new 600p M.2 SSD was meant to compete with or surpass the 950 Pro? The 600p cannot surpass the Samsung SM951 AHCI model's basic performance. Crucial (who is Intel's partner in their NAND fab business) had their version of the 600p planned for release, but won't bother doing so, they cancelled it. It uses TLC NAND. The 600p is a nice budget M.2 SSD, but that's it. I really wonder about Intel's SSD business, they continue to either be outdone by Samsung, or make design mistakes over and over. ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
DooRules
Newbie
Joined: 05 Nov 2015 Location: Newfoundland Status: Offline Points: 122 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Sep 2016 at 5:13pm |
|
not sure where I should post this guys so I put it here
![]() 960 is a beast of a drive http://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/minisite/ssd/product/consumer/960pro.html?CID=AFL-hq-mul-0813-11000279
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |