ASRock.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > OverClocking(OC) Zone > Achivement&Record
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Two 950's in R0
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search Search  Events   Register Register  Login Login

Two 950's in R0
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
parsec View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4996 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote parsec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Two 950's in R0
    Posted: 11 Mar 2016 at 2:19pm
WOW, 5GHz and 1.504V... OW!  Wink

CPU-Z must show the VID, which is not always the same as the true VCore. HWiNFO64 shows the Skylake VCore on ASRock boards. Any idea what the VCore really is? The max Skylake VID is 1.52V I think.

How about Skylake surviving that VCore? That on a 14nm chip. Shocked

Did you know that the same Intel design team (in Israel) that designed the Sandy Bridge processors also did the Skylake design?
Back to Top
Xaltar View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 16 May 2015
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 22748 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Xaltar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Dec 2015 at 9:17pm
5ghz well done Thumbs Up
Back to Top
DooRules View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Location: Newfoundland
Status: Offline
Points: 122 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DooRules Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Dec 2015 at 9:02pm
New high for my little 6700K Smile
Back to Top
DooRules View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Location: Newfoundland
Status: Offline
Points: 122 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DooRules Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Dec 2015 at 12:07am
Hehe, only 3200 yup. Smile never been one to play with ram much. All I ever want ram to do is not screw up. Embarrassed  Of course if you were to hand out some tips on how to get to 3600 I might be convinced to try. Big smile

Playing with chip again, 4.960 , chip multi on 49, cache multi on 48, and little tiny bump to bclk




Edited by DooRules - 18 Dec 2015 at 12:09am
Back to Top
DooRules View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Location: Newfoundland
Status: Offline
Points: 122 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DooRules Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Dec 2015 at 11:35pm
Cinebench at 4.9
Back to Top
parsec View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2015
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4996 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote parsec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Dec 2015 at 11:30pm
Huh? What bent CPU socket pin? Shocked  Nice, but no surprise from you... Thumbs Up

Wait... what's that? Your DDR4 memory at only 3200?




At least I can match an i7-6700K with my i5-6600K at 4.4GHz. Cool

Plus ya gotta use the right version of CPU-Z man! I gots the ASRock OC Formula version of CPU-Z.
Back to Top
Xaltar View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 16 May 2015
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 22748 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Xaltar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Dec 2015 at 2:51am
I kinda like it as it is very simple and quick to run. Not really a brilliant benchmark but it was a nice addition to the CPUZ feature set.
Back to Top
DooRules View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Location: Newfoundland
Status: Offline
Points: 122 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DooRules Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Dec 2015 at 2:37am
First time I have run that bench...
Back to Top
Xaltar View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 16 May 2015
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 22748 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Xaltar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Dec 2015 at 1:43am
Those are some great scores DooRules. Makes me wish I had the budget to pick up a pair of 950s myself. Just out of curiosity, what scores are you getting on your 6700K with the CPUZ bench tool? Since the latest update it seems to be scaling better on multi core tests.

Originally posted by parsec parsec wrote:

IMO, we are lucky that we (still) have what we have now, and that it works well, if not optimally. Not that I disagree with you Xaltar at all, I don't. I just hope we don't lose it soon.

I doubt we will have to worry about it for a long time yet, not with so many people still utilizing mechanical drives for storage. It would be nice to see a new NAND specific file system that takes better advantage of the technology as an option. I know next to nothing about programming and development but I would imagine it would probably be a nightmare to make it play nice with NTFS and FAT32. 

That said, given how fast my system feels using a regular SSD and with so much faster available now it may just be a moot point by the time it were actually ready to roll out. The nerd in me just wants another excuse to geek out. Geek Tongue 
Back to Top
DooRules View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Location: Newfoundland
Status: Offline
Points: 122 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DooRules Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Dec 2015 at 11:41pm

single 950 with OS installed





Throw in a cinebench run




Edited by DooRules - 16 Dec 2015 at 12:23am
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.