Firestrike scores

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   I figured I would make a thread here for 3d mark Firestrike scores seeing as it is a popular benchmark and will give forum goers something to stack up against.
Please formulate as follows:

System Specs:

CPU: Pentium G3258 @ 4.6ghz
Motherboard: ASRock Z97 Extreme3
RAM: ADATA XPG 1600, 4gb x2
GPU: Gigabyte GTX 960 G1 Gaming 2gb
(optional)
HDD: PNY optima 256gb
PSU: OCZ Camp1on Series 1000w
Cooling: Thermaltake Frio OCK
Case: Deepcool Tesseract

Firestrike score: 6803
Validation: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5403158

This is mine, currently number 1 for a GTX 960 and G3258 combo on futuremark 

Post up yours and see how you stand among your ASRock peers 

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
Xaltar Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Moderator Group Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 24623	Post Options Post Reply Quote Xaltar Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: Firestrike scores Posted: 11 Sep 2015 at 1:50pm
	I figured I would make a thread here for 3d mark Firestrike scores seeing as it is a popular benchmark and will give forum goers something to stack up against. Please formulate as follows: System Specs: CPU: Pentium G3258 @ 4.6ghz Motherboard: ASRock Z97 Extreme3 RAM: ADATA XPG 1600, 4gb x2 GPU: Gigabyte GTX 960 G1 Gaming 2gb (optional) HDD: PNY optima 256gb PSU: OCZ Camp1on Series 1000w Cooling: Thermaltake Frio OCK Case: Deepcool Tesseract Firestrike score: 6803 Validation: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5403158 This is mine, currently number 1 for a GTX 960 and G3258 combo on futuremark Post up yours and see how you stand among your ASRock peers

DooRules Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Newbie Joined: 05 Nov 2015 Location: Newfoundland Status: Offline Points: 122	Post Options Post Reply Quote DooRules Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 09 Dec 2015 at 4:25am
	Little play time with gpu this afternoon... http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6746058

Xaltar Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Moderator Group Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 24623	Post Options Post Reply Quote Xaltar Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 09 Dec 2015 at 5:39am
	Damn that is a nice score! My poor GTX 960 and G3258 combo can't even break 7k. Gotta love Maxwell

DooRules Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Newbie Joined: 05 Nov 2015 Location: Newfoundland Status: Offline Points: 122	Post Options Post Reply Quote DooRules Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 11 Dec 2015 at 6:24pm
	A little better. Got the core up +100 and the memory up +425, just had to up the voltage on memory and it scales very nicely to V increases... http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6766242

Xaltar Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Moderator Group Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 24623	Post Options Post Reply Quote Xaltar Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 11 Dec 2015 at 6:56pm
	Very nice, it's good to see you get what you pay for. My 960 performs almost exactly half as well as a 980 and your 980 Ti cranks out an additional 4000 points or so over the 980 which is well ahead of what I have seen overclocked 980s score. The Maxwell 2 line is about the most impressive step forward in GPUs I have seen since the Radeon HD 5000 series came out. I can't wait to see what comes next with Pascal and what it will bring to the table on the 16nm process with HBM. Edited by Xaltar - 11 Dec 2015 at 6:57pm

DooRules Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Newbie Joined: 05 Nov 2015 Location: Newfoundland Status: Offline Points: 122	Post Options Post Reply Quote DooRules Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 12 Dec 2015 at 8:07pm
	Moved chip from 4.8 to 4.9, all else same, fraction slower on gpu mem... http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6783199

Xaltar Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Moderator Group Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 24623	Post Options Post Reply Quote Xaltar Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 12 Dec 2015 at 9:55pm
	What kind of voltage are you running to get 4.9 benchable on your 6700k? By the looks of it you have a good chip on your hands

DooRules Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Newbie Joined: 05 Nov 2015 Location: Newfoundland Status: Offline Points: 122	Post Options Post Reply Quote DooRules Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 12 Dec 2015 at 10:00pm
	I can run pretty much anything at 4.9 with Vc of 1.465, fixed, llc 2. Temps during runs never hit above 71 on any core, actually two cores hit 70 and 71, with the other two topping out at 68. For short periods of time, I don't see too much of a chance of this presenting any problems. Short time being about an hour at a time. Will try seeing if there is a difference using bclk to achieve higher clocks as opposed to just upping the multi. Never know till ya try, right.

Xaltar Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Moderator Group Joined: 16 May 2015 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 24623	Post Options Post Reply Quote Xaltar Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 12 Dec 2015 at 10:18pm
	Haha, I was planning on trying the same as soon as I get my hands on a 6600k, BCLK vs multi and see what benches best Looking forward to seeing your results.

DooRules Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Newbie Joined: 05 Nov 2015 Location: Newfoundland Status: Offline Points: 122	Post Options Post Reply Quote DooRules Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 20 Dec 2015 at 9:25pm
	New high... http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6868072 Edited by DooRules - 20 Dec 2015 at 10:22pm